Imprime PGG Injection
Biological4 mg/kg i.v. over 2 hrs, weekly, in three week cycles
NCT Number: NCT00874848
The Phase 2 study described in this protocol will serve to evaluate the antitumor activity, safety and pharmacokinetic profile of Imprime PGG when combined with cetuximab and concomitant paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy in patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC. Additionally, this study will provide guidance for the design of more definitive efficacy studies of Imprime PGG in NSCLC patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Helios Clinic Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
4 mg/kg i.v. over 2 hrs, weekly, in three week cycles
initial loading dose of 400 mg/m^2 over 120 min and subsequent doses at 250 mg/m^2 over 60 min, weekly on Days 1, 8 and 15 of each 3-week treatment cycle
Other names: Erbitux
200 mg/m^2 i.v. over 3 hr on Day 2 of each 3-week treatment cycle for the first 4 to 6 treatment cycles
Other names: Abraxane, Taxol, Onxol, Nov-Onxol
dose equal to an AUC of 6 mg/mL · min based on the Calvert formula; i.v. over 30 min on Day 2 of each 3-week treatment cycle for the first 4 to 6 treatment cycles
Other names: Paraplatin
Time frame: From first dose to disease progression or last tumor assessment before treatment discontinuation due to any reason, up to 15 months
Overall objective response rate was defined as the number of participants experiencing a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on the modified RECIST v1.0 criteria.
The analysis performed for this study utilized a modified RECIST v1.0 in which a confirmed response after the initial response assessment was not required by repeat assessment. With the use of centrally read, blinded radiological assessments performed by independent radiologists, and the use of randomization between study arms, the criterion requiring a 'confirmation' response was removed. All other RECIST v1.0 criteria remained unmodified and implemented as stated in the guidelines.
Time frame: From the time of randomization to death, subject being lost to follow-up or study completion
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of documented death of the subject due to any cause, including death due to relapses that were successfully retreated. Subjects who were lost to follow-up or who were still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the last contact dates.
Time frame: From first dose to disease progression or last tumor assessment before treatment discontinuation due to any reason, up to 15 months
The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the number of participants experiencing a best overall tumor response of either CR, PR or SD. For stable disease (SD), follow-up measurements must have met the SD criteria at least once after study entry at a minimum interval of 6 weeks.
The analysis performed for this study utilized a modified RECIST v1.0 in which a confirmed response after the initial response assessment was not required by repeat assessment. With the use of centrally read, blinded radiological assessments performed by independent radiologists, and the use of randomization between study arms, the criterion requiring a 'confirmation' response was removed. All other RECIST v1.0 criteria remained unmodified and implemented as stated in the guidelines.
Time frame: From the first dose to disease progression or last tumor assessment before treatment discontinuation due to any reason, up to 15 months
The best observed overall response rates were defined as the number of participants experiencing a best overall response of either complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) based on the modified RECIST v1.0 criteria. For stable disease (SD), follow-up measurements must have met the SD criteria at least once after study entry at a minimum interval of 6 weeks.
The analysis performed for this study utilized a modified RECIST v1.0 in which a confirmed response after the initial response assessment was not required by repeat assessment. With the use of centrally read, blinded radiological assessments performed by independent radiologists, and the use of randomization between study arms, the criterion requiring a 'confirmation' response was removed. All other RECIST v1.0 criteria remained unmodified and implemented as stated in the guidelines.
Time frame: From the first dose to disease progression or last tumor assessment before treatment discontinuation due to any reason, up to 15 months
The duration of objective tumor response was measured from the time at which criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever status is recorded first) until the first date on which recurrence or progressive disease is objectively documented per modified RECIST v1.0. Subjects who did not progress as of the data cutoff date were censored at their last tumor assessment date.
The analysis performed for this study utilized a modified RECIST v1.0 in which a confirmed response after the initial response assessment was not required by repeat assessment. With the use of centrally read, blinded radiological assessments performed by independent radiologists, and the use of randomization between study arms, the criterion requiring a 'confirmation' response was removed. All other RECIST v1.0 criteria remained unmodified and implemented as stated in the guidelines.
Time frame: From time of randomization to first date of documented progression, or last tumor assessment date, up to 15 months
Time-to-progression (TTP) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first date of documented progressive disease. Progressive disease was identified by radiologic progressive disease according to modified RECIST v1.0, or in the case of the Investigator Radiologic Review, it may also be defined by clinical progression as determined by the investigator.
If a subject received any further anti-cancer therapy without prior documentation of disease progression, the subject was censored at the date of last tumor assessment before starting anti-cancer treatment. Subjects who died on study from other causes (not related to study disease) and subjects who were lost to follow-up or who were alive without documented progressive disease as of the data cut-off date for analysis were censored at the last tumor assessment date.
HiberCell, Inc.
Industry
Efficacy and Safety Study of Imprime PGG® Injection in Combination With Cetuximab and Concomitant Paclitaxel and Carboplatin Therapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced (Stage IIIB or IV) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06403436
Adult Disease, Adult Solid Tumor
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04318938
NSCLC
Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05165160
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Montpellier, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02856893
NSCLC
Brussels, Bruxelles Région, Belgium
View Trial Details