Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00598715

Efficacy Study of Two Different Strategies for Restenosis in Sirolimus-Eluting Stents

For lesions which develop restenosis after a drug-eluting stent, it is not known which the right strategy to use is, implantation of the same type of DES as the initial one or a DES with a different drug.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Treatment of in-stent restenosis after implantation of a DES has poorly been studied. Although there are no data, it may be assumed that certain lesions might be resistant to a given drug and in need of a different DES. Thus, for lesions which develop restenosis after a DES, it is not known which the right strategy to use is, implantation of the same type of DES as the initial one or a DES with a different drug. This prospective, randomized trial will compare the anti-restenotic efficacy of PES or SES in patients with restenosis after initial implantation of a SES

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients older than age 18 with ischemic symptoms or evidence of myocardial ischemia in the presence of > 50% re- stenosis after prior implantation of Sirolimus eluting stents in native coronary vessels
  • Written, informed consent by the patient or her/his legally-authorized representative for participation in the study
  • In women with childbearing potential a negative pregnancy test is mandatory

Exclusion criteria

  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Acute myocardial infarction within the first 48 hours from symptom onset.
  • Target lesion located in the left main trunk or bypass graft.
  • Malignancies or other comorbid conditions (for example severe liver, renal and pancreatic disease) with life expectancy less than 12 months or that may result in protocol non-compliance.
  • Allergy to antiplatelet therapy, sirolimus, paclitaxel, stainless steel.
  • Pregnancy (present, suspected or planned) or positive pregnancy test.
  • Previous enrollment in this trial.
  • Patient's inability to fully comply with the study protocol.

Treatment and study plan

Sirolimus eluting stent

Device

Sirolimus-eluting stent will be implanted

Other names: Cypher

Paclitaxel-eluting stent

Device

Paclitaxel-eluting stent will be implanted

Other names: Taxus

Primary outcomes

  1. Late luminal loss at follow-up angiography

    Time frame: 6-8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Need of target lesion revascularization.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Incidence of stent thrombosis.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Incidence of binary restenosis at follow-up angiography

    Time frame: 6-8 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel- vs Sirolimus-eluting Stents for Treatment of Coronary Restenosis in Sirolimus-eluting Stents

Acronym: DESIRE-2

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jan 22, 2008
Registry last updated
Dec 17, 2010

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.