Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01063517

Efficacy Study of Olaparib With Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Gastric Cancer Patients

To assess the efficacy of olaparib when given in combination with paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel alone as defined by progression-free survival (PFS), in all patients with recurrent and metastatic gastric cancer who progress following first-line therapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–130 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Research Site, Goyang-si, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer that has progressed following first line-therapy
  • Confirmed ATM protein status by IHC archival tumour sample
  • At least one lesion (measurable and/or non-measurable) that can be accurately assessed by imaging (CT/MRI) at baseline and follow up visits

Exclusion criteria

  • More than one prior chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of gastric cancer in the metastatic or recurrent setting
  • Any previous treatment with a PARP inhibitor, including olaparib
  • Patients with second primary cancer, except; adequately treated non melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in situ cancer of the cervix, or other solid tumours curatively treated with no evidence of disease for >5 years

Treatment and study plan

Olaparib

Drug

100mg BID oral tablet continuous

paclitaxel

Drug

iv infusion 80mg/m2 on Day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle

Other names: Taxol

Placebo

Drug

100mg BID oral tablet to match olaparib tablet

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Tumour assessments were carried out at baseline and then follow up assessments taken every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and then every 16 weeks until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    PFS is defined as the time from randomisation till objective progression or death. In absence of progression or death, the time is calculated from randomisation till last evaluable scanning visit.

  2. Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Patients With Tumours Defined as Homologous Recombination Deficient by Loss of Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutation (ATM) Protein [ATM Negative Patients]

    Time frame: Tumour assessments are carried out at baseline and then follow up assessments taken every 8 weeks up to Week 40 and then every 16 weeks until objective disease progression as defined by RECIST 1.1, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    PFS is defined as the time from randomisation till objective progression or death. In absence of progression or death, the time is calculated from randomisation till last evaluable scanning visit.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS) in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Survival follow up from randomisation till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Overall survival is defined as the duration from randomisation till death. In absence of death, the time is calculated from randomisation till the date subject last known to be alive.

  2. Overall Survival (OS) in ATM Negative Patients

    Time frame: Survival follow up from randomisation till death of the patient or till end of study in absence of death, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Overall survival is defined as the duration from randomisation till death. In absence of death, the time is calculated from randomisation till the date subject last known to be alive.

  3. Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Tumour assessments carried out at baseline, 28 days before randomisation then every 8 weeks until week 40, after week 40 assessments will be carried out every 16 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Objective response rate is the proportion of patients with at least one measurable lesion at baseline, who experienced complete or partial response at least once during the assessment period, according to the definitions of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1).

  4. Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the ATM Negative Patients

    Time frame: Tumour assessments carried out at baseline, 28 days before randomisation then every 8 weeks until week 40, after week 40 assessments will be carried out every 16 weeks until objective disease progression, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Objective response rate is the proportion of ATM negative patients with at least one measurable lesion at baseline, who experienced complete or partial response at least once during the assessment period, according to the definitions of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1).

  5. Percentage Change in Tumour Size at Week 8 in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Tumour scans done at Baseline and week 8

    Percentage change in tumour size from baseline to Week 8 calculated as 100 X (week 8 tumour size - baseline tumour size) / (baseline tumour size)

  6. Percentage Change in Tumour Size at Week 8 in the ATM Negative Patients

    Time frame: Tumour scans done at Baseline and week 8

    Percentage change in tumour size from baseline to Week 8 calculated as 100 X (week 8 tumour size - baseline tumour size) / (baseline tumour size)

  7. Time to Deterioration in Global Quality of Life (QoL) Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of Global QoL score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

  8. Time to Deterioration in QoL Fatigue Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of fatigue score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

  9. Time to Deterioration in QoL Nausea & Vomiting Domain Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of nausea & vomiting domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

  10. Time to Deterioration in QoL Pain Domain Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of pain domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

  11. Time to Deterioration in QoL Dysphagia Domain Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of dysphagia domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

  12. Time to Deterioration in QoL Eating Restriction Domain Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of eating restriction domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

  13. Time to Deterioration in QoL Stomach Pain Domain Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of stomach pain domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

  14. Time to Deterioration in QoL Reflux Domain Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of reflux domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

  15. Time to Deterioration in QoL Anxiety Domain Score in the Overall Study Population

    Time frame: Questionnaire data collected at Baseline ie on or before date of randomisation, every 4 weeks post baseline, assessed maximum up to 27 months

    Time calculated from randomisation till worsening of anxiety domain score based on European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire data

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised, Double Blinded, Multicentre Phase II Study to Assess the Efficacy of Olaparib (AZD2281, KU-0059436) in Combination With Paclitaxel Versus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer Who Progress Following First-line Therapy

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2023
First posted
Feb 5, 2010
Registry last updated
Jul 20, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.