Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02613507

Efficacy Study of Nivolumab Compared to Docetaxel in Subjects Previously Treated With Advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Nivolumab improves life expectancy compared to Docetaxel in Subjects with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer who have failed prior platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Local Institution - 0007, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com

Inclusion criteria

  • Disease progression experienced during or after one prior platinum containing doublet chemotherapy
  • Stage IIIb/IV or recurrent disease
  • Male and Female ≥ 18 years of age
  • Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1
  • Performance Status ≤ 1

Exclusion criteria

  • History of Carcinomatous meningitis
  • Active Central nervous system (CNS) metastases
  • History of auto immune diseases
  • Prior treatment with Docetaxel
  • Prior treatment with ipilimumab or any drug targeting T-Cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways

Treatment and study plan

Nivolumab

Drug

docetaxel

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Overall Survival

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)

    OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For subjects without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the subject was known to be alive

  2. Overall Survival Rate

    Time frame: From first dose to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (assessed from December 2015 to Oct 2017 approximately 22 months)

    OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For subjects without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the subject was known to be alive. Rates provided are Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    Time frame: From date of first dose up to partial or complete response (up to approximately 90 months)

    Investigator assessed ORR was defined as the number of participants whose best objective response (BOR) was a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR), as determined by the investigator, divided by the number of randomized participants.

    CR= Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

  2. Overall Survival (OS) in Subpopulations

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of death or date participant was last known to be alive (up to approximately 90 months)

    OS was defined as the time between the date of randomization and the date of death. For participants without documentation of death, OS was censored on the last date the participant was known to be alive. Test stratified by histology (SQ vs NSQ), PD-L1 status at 1% expression level (positive vs negative/unevaluable).

  3. Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression or death due to any cause (up to approximately 90 months)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by investigators per RECIST 1.1, or death due to any cause. Clinical deterioration in the absence of unequivocal evidence of progression was not considered progression for purposes of determining PFS. Participants who died without a reported prior progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not have disease progression or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die were censored at the randomization date. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy (including on-treatment palliative RT of non-target bone lesions, skin lesions or CNS lesions) without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy.

  4. Progression Free Survival Rate

    Time frame: From the time of randomization up to 6 months

    Clinical deterioration in the absence of unequivocal evidence of progression (per RECIST 1.1) is not considered progression for purposes of determining PFS. Participants who die without a reported prior progression will be considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not have disease progression or die will be censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on study tumor assessments and did not die will be censored at the randomization date. Participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression will be censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Six month progression-free survival rate as estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method

  5. Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)

    Time frame: From randomization up to disease progression, death, or last dose (up to approximately 17 months)

    TTF was defined as the minimum of the time from randomization to disease progression (per RECIST 1.1 or clinical), death or last dose date if a participant discontinued from treatment for any reasons other than "maximum clinical benefit" and "administrative reasons by sponsor". TTF was considered as event at the randomization date for participants who were randomized but not treated. TTF was censored at the last dose date for participants who discontinued treatment due to "maximum clinical benefit" or "administrative reasons by sponsor". TTF was censored at the last dose date for participants who continued on treatment without progression or death.

    This outcome measure was prespecified in the protocol to only be evaluated through the first Interim Analysis, which occurred in June 2017.

  6. Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: From first dose up to 100 days after last dose (up to 93 months)

    A treatment-related Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition in a clinical investigation participant administered study treatment and is determined to be associated with the study treatment. Adverse events are graded on a scale from 1 to 5, with Grade 1 being mild and asymptomatic; Grade 2 is moderate requiring minimal, local or noninvasive intervention; Grade 3 is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 events are usually severe enough to require hospitalization; Grade 5 events are fatal.

  7. Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: From first dose up to 100 days after last dose (up to 93 months)

    A treatment-related Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening (defined as an event in which the participant was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe), requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization and is determined to be associated with the study treatment.

  8. Disease Related Symptom Deterioration Rate by Week 12 and Week 24

    Time frame: At Week 12 and Week 24

    Disease-Related Symptom Deterioration Rate is the percentage of participants with >=10 points increase from baseline in Average Symptom Burden Index (ASBI) score at any time between randomization and the timepoints. The Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) measures 6 items (loss of appetite, fatigue, coughing, shortness of breath, hemoptysis, pain) and 3 symptom burden items (disease-related functional limitations, quality of life) with responses captured using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 (highest quality of life) to 100 (worst quality of life) and is derived by dividing the length of the line drawn from the lowest possible response to the patient's response by the length of the VAS and multiplying the result by 100. An ASBI score can be derived as the mean of scores for the 6 symptom-related items with a clinically meaningful change in ASBI score being 10 points and a meaningful deterioration in symptoms is a mean post-baseline score change >= 10 points.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Open-label Randomized Multinational Phase 3 Trial of Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (CheckMate 078: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 078)

Acronym: CheckMate 078

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2023
First posted
Nov 24, 2015
Registry last updated
Nov 19, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.