NCT Number: NCT03019744
Efficacy Study of FES Controlled by Electromyographic Signal for the Treatment of Upper Limb in Post-stroke Patients
Goal of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of Myoelectrically-controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation (MeCFES) for the rehabilitation of upper limb in post-stroke patients. MeCFES-assisted rehabilitation will be compared with usual care rehabilitation of upper limb. It is hypothesized that that applying MeCFES in rehabilitation to assist normal arm movements during rehabilitation of the upper limb in persons with stroke will improve the movement quality and success and thus induce recovery at the body functions level (impairment) and the activity level (disability) of the International Classification of Function (ICF) superior to that induced by usual care rehabilitation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Hemiplegia/hemiparesis due to a first ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke
- at least 1 month post-stroke
- willingness to participate the project
- minimum voluntary muscle activation of shoulder flexors (>1 Manual Muscle Test)
- passive Range of Motion (ROM) of the shoulder and elbow of more than 90°
Exclusion criteria
- epilepsy
- severe spasticity at upper limb (>= 3 Ashworth scale)
- implanted electronic device
- respiratory insufficiency
- pregnancy
- peripheral neuropathies
- cutaneous ulcers at the stimulation zone
- other use of FES on the upper limb
Treatment and study plan
Usual Care task-oriented upper limb rehabilitation
OtherPrimary outcomes
-
Change Score of ARAT Scale Between Two Time Points: Post-treatment vs Pre-treatment
Time frame: 5 weeks (post-treatment vs pre-treatment)
ARAT: Action Research Arm Test scale (15 item) (see in References section: Van der Lee JH et al 2002).
ARAT minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 45. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
-
Change Score of FMA-UE Scale Between Two Time Points: Post-treatment vs Pre-treatment
Time frame: 5 weeks (post-treatment vs pre-treatment)
FMA-UE: Upper Extremities section of Fugl Meyer Assessment scale (see in References section: Fugl-Meyer AR et al 1975).
FMA-UE minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 66. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Secondary outcomes
-
Change Score of IPPA Between Two Time Points: Post-treatment vs Pre-treatment
Time frame: 5 weeks (post-treatment vs pre-treatment)
IPPA: Individually Prioritized Problem Assessment (see in References section: Wessels R et al. 2000).
IPPA minimum value is 1 and maximum value is 25. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
-
Change Score of DASH Between Two Time Points: Post-treatment vs Pre-treatment
Time frame: 5 weeks (post-treatment vs pre-treatment)
DASH: Quick version of the Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (see in References section: Kennedy et al. 2011) DASH minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 100. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
-
Change Score of VAS for Perceived Pain Between Two Time Points: Post-treatment vs Pre-treatment
Time frame: 5 weeks (post-treatment vs pre-treatment)
VAS: Visual Analogic Scale for perceived pain on a 10-level scale. VAS minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 10. Higher scores mean worse outcome (more severe pain).
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
Other
Collaborators
- Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri
Registry information
Official study title
Studio Clinico di Efficacia Della Stimolazione Elettrica Funzionale Controllata da Segnale Elettromiografico Nel Trattamento Dell'Arto Superiore in Pazienti Con Esiti di Ictus Cerebrovascolare (Progetto Rises)
Acronym: RiSES
Important dates
- Study start
- 2011
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2015
- First posted
- Jan 13, 2017
- Registry last updated
- Oct 26, 2018
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Women's Health Initiative Strong and Healthy Study
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsTemporary Inactivation of Strong Muscle Sensation to Improve Rehabilitation Interventions in SCI
NCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsComparison of the Effects of Mirror Therapy,rTMS and Robotic-assisted Hand Therapy in Stroke Patients
NCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsImpact of COVID-19 Vaccines on Cerebrovascular Health
NCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details