Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00258986

Efficacy Study Comparing Hand-assisted Laparoscopic and Mini-incision Muscle Splitting Incision Living Donor Nephrectomy

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of hand-assisted laparoscopic and mini-incision muscle-splitting donornephrectomy on living kidney donors. The hypothesis is that the mini-incision is not inferior to the laparoscopic technique.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

University Medical Center Groningen

Groningen, 9700 RB, Netherlands

About this study

Living kidney donation has become an important source for kidney transplantation because of insufficient numbers of post mortem kidney donations. To reduce the surgical trauma of the donor operation and improve postoperative recovery minimal invasive techniques have developed. Especially the laparoscopic and the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique gained wide popularity. Minimal invasive open techniques have had less publicity. One of those open techniques is to perform the open donornephrectomy by means of an anterolateral approach. A transverse subcostal incision of 10 cm or less is made. The abdominal wall is opened by splitting the muscles and sparing the nerves. Staying in the retroperitoneal space the kidney is freed and taken out. Laparoscopic approaches have especially become more popular after the hand-assisted technique had developed. By means of an 8 cm transverse suprapubic skin incision and a vertical midline fascia incision the abdominal cavity is opened and a hand is inserted in the abdomen through an air tight sleeve. Three more trocarts are needed for the insufflation, the video camera and surgical instruments to perform a transperitoneal donornephrectomy. The hand in the abdomen assisting in the procedure has especially increased the sense of safety compared to the full laparoscopic technique without compromising the advantages of the laparoscopic technique.

So far no prospective or retrospective study has been done comparing the hand-assisted laparoscopic with the mini-incision muscle-splitting technique. Most studies that have been done comparing the (hand-assisted) laparoscopic technique with more invasive open techniques resulted in favour of the former technique.

Comparison(s): The study compares the effects of hand-assisted laparoscopic and mini-incision muscle-splitting donornephrectomy on living kidney donors.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Accepted as living kidney donor by local protocol
  • 18 years or older
  • Excellent understanding of Dutch language
  • Able to be operated on by both surgical techniques
  • Having read patient information and signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous surgery using subcostal incision(s)
  • Not meeting the inclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Living donornephrectomy

Procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Triple pain measurement using linear Visual Analogue Scale (at rest, at coughing and in supine position lifting of straight legs)

Secondary outcomes

  1. - CRP levels in first three days after the donor operation (indicative of the magnitude of the surgical trauma)

  2. - Abdominal wall muscle function (testing the functional integrity of the abdominal muscles)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Groningen

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2004
Study completion
2006
First posted
Nov 28, 2005
Registry last updated
Mar 4, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.