Cabotegravir Tablets
DrugCAB tablets are white to almost white oval shaped film coated 30 mg tablets for oral administration. CAB tablets are to be stored up to 30 degree Celsius and protected from moisture.
NCT Number: NCT03299049
This Antiretroviral Therapy as Long Acting Suppression every 2 Months (ATLAS-2M) study is designed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity and safety of CAB LA + RPV LA administered every 8 weeks (Q8W) compared to CAB LA + RPV LA administered every 4 weeks (Q4W) over a 48-week treatment period in approximately 1020 adult HIV-1 infected subjects. Subjects will be divided in 2 groups; Group 1 will include subjects receiving current anti-retroviral (ART) standard of care (SOC) therapy whereas group 2 will include subjects currently receiving CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W in ATLAS study. Subjects in both groups will be randomized to receive CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W or Q8W. The study will be carried out in 3 phases including screening phase, maintenance phase and extension phase. Subjects choosing not to enter the Extension phase can complete their study participation at the Week 100 visit and enter into the 52-week Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Phase as required. A sub-study in the ATLAS-2M study will evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and efficacy of CAB and RPV long acting injections following intramuscular administration in the Vastus Lateralis Muscle (thigh) in HIV-infected Adult Participants who have received at least three years of Gluteal Injections in this ATLAS-2M Study.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
GSK Investigational Site, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Non-reproductive potential defined as: pre-menopausal females with one of the following: documented tubal ligation; documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion; hysterectomy; Documented Bilateral Oophorectomy.
Postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea [in questionable cases a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol levels consistent with menopause (refer to laboratory reference ranges for confirmatory levels)]. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrollment.
Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed in the Modified List of Highly Effective Methods for Avoiding Pregnancy in Females of Reproductive Potential (FRP) from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication, throughout the study, for at least 30 days after discontinuation of all oral study medications, and for at least 52 weeks after discontinuation of CAB LA and RPV LA. The investigator is responsible for ensuring that participants understand how to properly use these methods of contraception.
Exclusion criteria
For subjects not transitioning from 201585 (ATLAS):
For Subjects transitioning from 201585 (ATLAS):
For all subjects:
Subjects positive for HBsAg are excluded; Subjects negative for anti-HBs but positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for HBV DNA are excluded. Note: Participants positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for anti-HBs (past and/or current evidence) are immune to HBV and are not excluded.
(Age x AST ) / ( Platelets x ( square [ ALT ])
Sub-study exclusion criteria
CAB tablets are white to almost white oval shaped film coated 30 mg tablets for oral administration. CAB tablets are to be stored up to 30 degree Celsius and protected from moisture.
RPV tablets are 25 mg tablets that are off-white, round, biconvex, film-coated and debossed on one side with "TMC" and the other side with "25". RPV tablets should be stored at 25 degree Celsius (excursions permitted to 15 degree-30 degree Celsius) and protected from light.
CAB LA injectable suspension is a sterile white to slightly pink suspension containing 200 mg/mL of GSK1265744 as free acid for administration by IM injection. CAB LA injectable suspension is to be stored at up to 30 degree Celsius and should not be frozen.
RPV LA injectable suspension is a sterile white suspension containing 300 mg/mL of RPV as the free base for administration by IM injection. RPV LA injectable suspension should be kept in the outer package and stored at 2-8 degree Celsius and should not be frozen. RPV LA should also be protected from light.
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA >=50 c/mL as per FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 48 was assessed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W regimen over 48 weeks in HIV-1 infected ART experienced participants. The HIV-1 RNA >=50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the Week 48 analysis visit window. Intent-to-treat-Exposed (ITT-E) Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were assessed according to their randomized treatment, regardless of the treatment they received.
Time frame: Week 48
Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI)
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL at Week 48 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI)
Time frame: Weeks 24 and 48
CVF was defined as rebound as indicated by two consecutive plasma HIV-1-RNA levels >=200 c/mL after prior suppression to <200 c/mL. Cumulative percentage of participants with protocol defined CVF up to Weeks 24 and 48 has been presented.
Time frame: Weeks 24
Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA >=50 c/mL at Week 24 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA >=50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI).
Time frame: Weeks 48
Plasma samples were collected for quantitative analysis of HIV-1 RNA. Logarithm to base 10 (log10) values for plasma HIV-1 RNA has been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
Plasma samples were collected for quantitative analysis of HIV-1 RNA. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Logarithm to base 10 values for plasma HIV-1 RNA has been presented.
Time frame: Week 48
Blood samples were collected and CD4+ cell count assessment by flow cytometry was carried out to evaluate the immunologic activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
Blood samples were collected and CD4+ cell count assessment by flow cytometry was carried out to evaluate the immunologic activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+RPV LA Q4W. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Up to Week 48
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other situations as per medical or scientific judgement. Safety Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were assessed according to actual treatment received.
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Severity of adverse events were defined as per The Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS adverse events Grading Table). Severity grades for adverse events were as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe), Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening) and Grade 5 (all deaths related to an AE).
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Clinical chemistry toxicities were graded as per the DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphate (ALP), aspartate aminotranferase (AST), bilirubin, carbon dioxide (CO2), cholesterol, creatinine kinase, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine adjusted for bovine serum albumin (BSA), glucose, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) calculation, lipase, phosphate, potassium, sodium and triglycerides. Severity grades were: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening).
Time frame: Up to Week 48
The hematology toxicities were graded as per the DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table). Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Severity grades were as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening).
Time frame: Up to Week 48
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Percentage of participants with adverse events leading to withdrawal has been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemical parameters including ALT, ALP, AST and creatinine kinase. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: albumin. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: bilirubin and creatinine. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: CO2, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium and urea. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: cholesterol, glucose, direct HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol calculation and triglycerides. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: Lipase. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: erythrocyte MCV. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Up to Week 48 analysis
Phenotypic resistance (PR) was analyzed in participants who met CVF criteria. PR for following Baseline third agent drugs: Integrase inhibitors(INI): bictegravir (BIC), CAB, dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir (EVG), raltegravir(RAL); non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors(NNRTI): delavirdine(DLV), efavirenz(EFV), etravirine(ETR), nevirapine(NVP), RPV; nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI): lamivudine(3TC), abacavir(ABC), emtricitabine(FTC), tenofovir(TDF), zidovudine(ZDV), stavudine(d4T), didanosine(ddI) and protease inhibitors(PI): atazanavir(ATV), darunavir(DRV), fosamprenavir(FPV), indinavir(IDV), lopinavir(LPV), nelfinavir(NFV), ritonavir(RTV), saquinavir(SQV) and tipranavir (TPV) is presented. Phenotypic susceptibility was defined based on the fold change (FC) value: resistant (FC>clinical higher cutoff or biological cutoff), partially sensitive (FC<=clinical higher cutoff and > clinical lower cutoff), sensitive(FC<=clinical lower cutoff or biological cutoff)
Time frame: Up to Week 48 analysis
Genotypic resistance was analyzed in participants who met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria. Genotypic Resistance data for the following Baseline third agent drugs, INI: BIC, DTG, EVG, RAL; NNRTI: DLV, EFV, ETR, NVP, RPV; NRTI: 3TC, ABC, FTC, TDF, ZDV, d4T, ddI and PI: ATV, ATV/ritonavir (r), DRV/r, FPV/r, IDV/r, LPV/r, NFV, RTV, SQV/r and TPV/r in participants meeting CVF criteria has been presented.
Time frame: Week 48
Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated "Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer". The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV subjects received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants without prior exposure to CAB+RPV who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented.
Time frame: Week 48
Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated "Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer". The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV subjects received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants with >=1 weeks of prior exposure to CAB+RPV who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented.
Time frame: Week 48
Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated "Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer". The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV participants received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the health related QoL (HRQoL). It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, medication worries (MEDWO) and disclosure worries (DISWO). Total imputed value score for LISAT is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: LISAT 100=[100 divided by (20 minus 4)]*(LISAT minus 4). A response of 5 in LISAT score shows satisfaction all of the time and 1 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used as primary method of analysis. Data for participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks [without exposure] and >=1 Weeks [with exposure]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the HRQoL. It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, MEDWO and DISWO. The total imputed value score for MEDWO is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: MEDWO 100=[100 divided by (25 minus 5)]*(MEDWO minus 5). A response of 1 in MEDWO score shows medication worries all of the time and 5 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks [without exposure] and >=1 Weeks [with exposure]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the HRQoL. It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, MEDWO and DISWO. The total imputed value score for DISWO is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: DISWO 100=[100 divided by (25 minus 5)]*(DISWO minus 5). A response of 1 in DISWO score shows disclosure worries all of the time and 5 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks [without exposure] and >=1 Weeks [with exposure]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The HIVTSQs treatment satisfaction questionnaire comprises of 1-12 questions and the total treatment satisfaction score is computed with items 1-11 and summed to produce a score with a possible range of 0 to 66. Higher scores represent greater treatment satisfaction as compared to the past few weeks. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks [without exposure] and >=1 Weeks [with exposure]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
HIVTSQs is a 12 item questionnaire. The individual item scores on HIVTSQs scale are rated as 6 (very satisfied, convenient, flexible, etc.) to 0 (very dissatisfied, inconvenient, inflexible, etc.). Higher scores represent greater satisfaction with each aspect of treatment. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks [without exposure] and >=1 Weeks [with exposure]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Week 48
The HIVTSQc is a 1-12 items questionnaire. Each item is scored -3 to 3. Total treatment satisfaction change score is computed using items 1 to 11 and are summed to produce a score with a possible range of -33 to 33. Higher the score, greater the improvement in satisfaction with treatment; the lower the score, the greater the deterioration in satisfaction with treatment. A score of 0 represented no change. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Total treatment satisfaction change score for participants who entered the current study from Q4W arm of ATLAS (NCT number: NCT02951052) and from either standard of care (SOC) arms of ATLAS or the new SOC participants) has been presented.
Time frame: Week 8 and Weeks 24 and 48
The PIN questionnaire explores bother of pain at injection site and injection site reactions (ISR), anxiety before and after injection, willingness to receive an HIV injectable treatment the following visit and satisfaction with mode of treatment administration of individuals receiving injection and perceptions of individuals associated with receiving injections. This measure contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. Scores range from 1 to 5, and questions are phrased in such a way as to ensure that 1 always equated with the most favourable perception of vaccination, and 5 most unfavourable. Dimension scores include bother from ISR, leg movement, sleep and acceptability. Score of a domain is calculated as mean of all items within the domain. Higher scores represent worse perception of injection. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis.
Time frame: Week 8 and Weeks 24 and 48
The PIN questionnaire explores the bother of pain at the injection site and ISRs, anxiety before and after injection, willingness to receive an HIV injectable treatment the following visit and satisfaction with the mode of treatment administration of individuals receiving injection and perceptions of individuals associated with receiving injections. This measure contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. The items in the scale are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1(very dissatisfied, extremely, etc.) to 5 (very satisfied, not at all, etc.). Lower scores represent worse perception of injection. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
The ACCEPT questionnaire is a generic medication acceptance measure assessing how participants weigh advantages and disadvantages of long-term medication.The questionnaire consists of 25 items that capture six dimensions.3 questions that focus on general acceptance of study medication were analyzed.Items on the scale are rated as 1-5 scores:1:not at all acceptable,2:not very acceptable,3:somewhat acceptable, 4:totally acceptable and 5:I don't know.Total score of the dimension is calculated as the mean of recoded items of the dimension and then linearly transformed to be on a scale from 0 to 100:Total Score=(mean of the recoded items in the dimension minus1)divided by2*100. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Data for participants without or with prior exposure has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available value up to and including the Maintenance treatment. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of CAB LA. PK Population comprises of all participants who received CAB and / or RPV and underwent PK sampling during the study and provide at least 1 non-missing CAB and / or RPV plasma concentration value (Non-quantifiable [NQ] values will be considered as non-missing values).
Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of RPV LA.
Time frame: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze concentration in plasma for CAB LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure.
Time frame: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze concentration in plasma for RPV LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure.
Time frame: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze Cmax in plasma for CAB LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure.
Time frame: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze Cmax in plasma for RPV LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure.
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of CAB LA and RPV LA. Demographic parameters including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, body weight, body mass index, and relevant laboratory parameters were planned to be evaluated as potential predictors of inter participant variability for pharmacokinetic parameters.
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of CAB LA and RPV LA. Demographic parameters including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, body weight, body mass index, and relevant laboratory parameters were planned to be evaluated as potential predictors of intra participant variability for pharmacokinetic parameters.
ViiV Healthcare
Industry
A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Non-inferiority, Open-label Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Long-acting Cabotegravir Plus Long-acting Rilpivirine Administered Every 8 Weeks or Every 4 Weeks in HIV-1-infected Adults Who Are Virologically Suppressed
Acronym: ATLAS-2M
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02938520
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Long Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06134362
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Blood-Borne Infections
Almagro, Argentina
View Trial DetailsNCT06316739
Blood-Borne Infections, Chemically-Induced Disorders
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06317051
Blood-Borne Infections, Body Weight
Buenos Aires, Argentina
View Trial Details