Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00596817

Efficacy of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in the Prevention of Relapse of Major Depressive Episodes

This study will evaluate the efficacy of Vortioxetine in the prevention of relapse of major depressive episodes in patients who responded to open-label treatment with Vortioxetine.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Major Depressive Episode (MDE) as the primary diagnosis according to DSM-IV TR criteria
  • At least one other MDE before the current one
  • Moderate to severe depression

Exclusion criteria

  • Any current psychiatric disorder other than Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as defined in the DSM-IV TR
  • Any substance disorder within the previous 6 months
  • Female patients of childbearing potential who are not using effective contraception
  • Use of any psychoactive medication 2 weeks prior to screening and during the study

Randomisation Criteria: Patients in remission (MADRS total score <=10) at both Week 10 and Week 12

Other protocol-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Placebo

Drug

capsules, daily, orally

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004)

Drug

encapsulated tablets, daily, orally

Other names: Brintellix

Primary outcomes

  1. Relapse Within First 24 Weeks of the Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator

    Time frame: Within first 24 weeks of the double-blind period

    The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The rating should be based on a clinical interview with the patient, moving from broadly phrased questions about symptoms to more detailed ones, which allow a precise rating of severity, covering the last 7 days. Total score from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relapse During the Entire Double-blind Period Based on a MADRS Total Score >=22 or an Unsatisfactory Treatment Effect (Lack of Efficacy) as Judged by the Investigator

    Time frame: Within 64 weeks of the double-blind period

  2. Change From Double-blind Baseline in MADRS Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment

    Time frame: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period

  3. Change From Double-blind Baseline in HAM-D-17 Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment

    Time frame: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period

    The Hamilton Depression Scale - 17 items (HAM-D-17) measures depression severity. Items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptoms not present) to a maximum of 2 to 4 (symptom extremely severe) for a total score range of 0 to 52. The higher the score, the more severe.

  4. Change From Double-blind Baseline in HAM-A Total Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment

    Time frame: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period

    The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) consists of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behaviour at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic, and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total score from 0 to 56. The higher the score, the more severe.

  5. Change From Double-blind Baseline in CGI-S Score After 24 Weeks of Double-blind Treatment

    Time frame: Double-blind Baseline and Week 24 of the double-blind period

    The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). The investigator should use his/her total clinical experience with this patient population to judge how mentally ill the patient is at the time of rating.

  6. Proportion of Responders at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period (Response Defined as a >=50% Reduction in MADRS Total Score From Open-label Baseline)

    Time frame: Week 24 of the double-blind period (Counted From Open-label Baseline)

  7. Proportion of Remitters at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period (Remission Defined as a MADRS Total Score <=10)

    Time frame: Week 24 of the double-blind period

  8. Change From Double-blind Baseline in SDS Total Score at Week 24 of the Double-blind Period

    Time frame: Week 24 of the double-blind period (Counted From Double-blind Baseline)

    The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) comprises self-rated items designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and (3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scales, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. The three items may be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). The higher the score, the more severe.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

H. Lundbeck A/S

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre, Relapse-prevention Study With Two Doses of [Vortioxetine] Lu AA21004 in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jan 17, 2008
Registry last updated
Mar 31, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.