Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02543619

Efficacy of Two Injection Techniques on Success Rate of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Anesthesia

Forty healthy patients with including criteria who failed to infra alveolar nerve block injection (without lip numbness) have been randomly divided into two groups on a random basis and have received Gow-Gates or another inferior alveolar nerve block injection. Endodontic access cavity preparation has been initiated after complete anesthesia. If patients felt any pain during the steps of caries or dentin removal, Endodontic access cavity preparation or canal working length determination, treatment has been stopped and their pain has been measured by Heft Parker 170 mm Visual Analog Scale (Zero as no pain and 170 as maximum pain ).The data has been analyzed by Mann-U-Whitney and CHI- SQUARE tests.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Dental Branch, AZad UMS

Tehran, Tehran Province, Iran

About this study

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of Gow-Gates and inferior alveolar nerve block on success rate of anesthesia in patients with irreversible pulpitis. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study , forty healthy patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and including criteria who failed to infra alveolar nerve block injection (without lip numbness) have been randomly divided into two groups on a random basis and have received Gow-Gates or another inferior alveolar nerve block injection. Their pain has been evaluated by electric pulp tester every 5 minutes for two times. Endodontic access cavity preparation has been initiated after complete anesthesia. If patients felt any pain during the steps of caries or dentin removal, Endodontic access cavity preparation or canal working length determination, treatment has been stopped and their pain has been measured by Heft Parker 170 mm Visual Analog Scale (Zero as no pain and 170 as maximum pain ). The patients have been instructed to rate any pain during each of the mentioned steps. The data have been analyzed by Mann-U-Whitney and CHI- SQUARE tests.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis ( Visual Analog Scale ≥ 54) in one mandibular molar who need root canal treatment
  • without systemic diseases
  • non smoking
  • non analgesic/sedative or any medicine consumption
  • non pregnant
  • non breast feeding
  • the patients who received one conventional inferior alveolar nerve block and their block was failed ( without lip numbness)

Exclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Injection technique

Other

One group received Gow-Gates technique and the other group received Infra Alveolar Nerve Block technique for their failed first one anesthesia

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Score

    Time frame: 4 Hours

    Heft Parker 170 mm Analog Visual Scale

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Azad University of Medical Sciences

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Efficacy of Gow-Gates and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection Techniques on Success Rate of Anesthesia in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Sep 7, 2015
Registry last updated
Sep 7, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.