Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01432834

Efficacy of the Wavefront Optimized (WFO) Profile in Non-anterior Astigmatisms

The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy of the Allegretto Wave excimer laser and the wavefront optimized ablation profile in correcting primarily non-anterior astigmatism faults, following laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Eye Institute of Thrace (EIT)

Alexandroupoli, 68100, Greece

About this study

Different optical components of the eye contribute to the total astigmatism error.In specific, the anterior corneal surface is responsible for the anterior component of astigmatism fault (anterior astigmatism), while the posterior corneal surface and the lens are responsible for the posterior one (posterior astigmatism).

Regarding our study, 74 refractive surgery candidates were recruited. Only one eye from each candidate was randomly enrolled in the study. Of them, 40 eyes underwent LASIK treatment (LG group), while 34 eyes underwent PRK treatment (PG group). The Allegretto Wave excimer laser (software version: 2.020 / WaveLight AG, Erlangen, Germany) was used for the ablation in all groups. Preoperatively, the ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) was calculated for each eye, according to which each astigmatism fault was characterized as primarily anterior or non-anterior.ORA is the vectorial value of astigmatism arising from non-anterior sources. Its amount on total astigmatism (R) is determined by the magnitude ratio ORA/R. Ratios below 1 indicate primarily anterior astigmatism, while ratios above 1 indicate primarily non-anterior astigmatism. 20 LG eyes and 16 PG eyes presented primarily anterior astigmatism (LG-A and PG-A subgroups, respectively), while 20 LG eyes and 18 PG eyes demonstrated primarily non-anterior astigmatism (LG-NA and PG-NA subgroups, respectively). Postoperatively, vector analysis of astigmatism correction was conducted; The following indexes were calculated: a) Correction index (CI), b) Difference vector (DV) and c) Index of Success (IOS).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • astigmatism fault

Exclusion criteria

  • previous incisional eye surgery
  • evidence of any type of corneal pathology
  • evidence of any type of optic neuropathy
  • history of optic neuropathy
  • diabetes mellitus

Treatment and study plan

Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)

Other

During LASIK treatments the Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH & Co.KG, Kleinostheim, Germany) with 130μm cutting head was used for the creation of the flap. The normal value of the negative pressure of the suction ring was between 600-620 mmHg and the velocity of the head movement was constant (3mm/sec). The hinge was created at the 12 o'clock position. The Allegretto Wave excimer laser (software version: 2.020 / WaveLight AG, Erlangen, Germany) was used for all ablations. Attempted ablations were modified according to the "S001 Wellington" nomogram for the "wavefront optimised" protocol.

Other names: Allegretto Wave excimer laser (software version: 2.020 / WaveLight AG, Erlangen, Germany), Carriazo-Pendular microkeratome (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH & Co.KG, Kleinostheim, Germany)

Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)

Other

The same surgical procedure was applied to all PG participants that included: Instillation of proparacaine hydrochloride 0.5% drops for topical anaesthesia, application of a sponge saturated with 10% alcohol to the central cornea for 20-30 seconds and subsequent de-epithelialization by means of a hockey knife.The Allegretto Wave excimer laser (software version: 2.020 / WaveLight AG, Erlangen, Germany) was used for all ablations. Attempted ablations were modified according to the "S001 Wellington" nomogram for the "wavefront optimised" protocol. A soft therapeutic lens was applied until complete re-epithelialization of the cornea was detected.

Other names: Allegretto Wave excimer laser (software version: 2.020 / WaveLight AG, Erlangen, Germany)

Primary outcomes

  1. vector analysis of astigmatism correction, following laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) & photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) treatments.

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

    Vector analysis of astigmatism correction was conducted using preoperative and 6-month postoperative data. The following indexes were calculated: a) Correction index (CI) which is determined by the ratio of the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) to the target induced astigmatism (TIA), b) Difference vector (DV) as an absolute measure of success, and, c) Index of Success (IOS) which is determined by the relationship of the DV to the TIA, as a relative measure of success.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Democritus University of Thrace

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Allegretto Wave and the Wavefront Optimized Ablation Profile in Non-anterior Astigmatisms

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2011
First posted
Sep 13, 2011
Registry last updated
Jan 18, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.