Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01382537

Efficacy of the InterX 5000 in the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain

This study will focus on the efficacy of treating 80 patients who have functional limitations in activity because of chronic/recurrent neck or shoulder pain.

Hypothesis 1: InterX therapy alone will have a moderate effect to reduce pain during weeks 1-2.

Hypothesis 2: Functional gains will be greater in patients receiving InterX therapy compared to those who received placebo treatment.

Hypothesis 3: Chronic neck and shoulder pain is more prevalent in patients who exhibit radiographic evidence of degenerative spondylosis/arthrosis of the cervical spine.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Evaluation of subjects will be conducted at baseline (interval 0) and at 2, 4, 6 and 12 week time periods. At 26 weeks, the patient will be contacted to obtain follow-up questionnaires on pain and function. After informed consent, participants will be randomly assigned to a treatment group and a sham group using the InterX5002, hand held electrical stimulation unit. Treatment will be administered three times per week for six weeks.

During the interval of weeks 1-2 patients will have either the InterX treatment/sham alone. Weeks 3-4 will advance the patient adding a standardized rehabilitation exercise program typical for chronic neck patients. During weeks 5-6, the patient will be scheduled for treatment and will use a self-administered InterX treatment ("home" Flex) unit mimicking home care but accounting for compliance issues through attendance being monitored.

Baseline and follow-up assessments will consist of pain scores, NDI, neck fatigue testing, shoulder and arm reach tasks and walking on a treadmill at 2 MPH for 5 minutes (Neck-walk Index, NWI). Neck fatigue testing will consist of prone positioning and extensor muscle exertion against resistance to tolerance at 60% MVC. Myoelectric sensors will be taped to the skin to record muscle activity during fatigue and reach task testing. Electromagnetic sensors will be taped to a swimmers cap worn by the patient and on the skin at T1 over the spine at the shoulder level and S1 at the pelvis during the walk on the treadmill and on the shoulder and arm during reach testing.

Venipuncture will be performed at the evaluation intervals to collect blood samples for quantifying circulating inflammatory cytokines.

Analysis will focus on change in pain scores and inflammatory cytokines over the first two weeks for Hypothesis H1. Primary functional outcomes including neck fatigue and progression through neck rehabilitation exercise will be tested for Hypothesis2. The third hypothesis will be tested in two ways. First, quantification of degenerative changes (e.g.disc narrowing & osteophyte formation) on x-ray (AP & Lat screening views) will be contrasted to incidence in the published literature. Second, pain levels at baseline will be stratified into quartiles and compared to quantitative tally of degenerative changes. This data will serve as a basis for determining whether future studies using degenerative change criteria are warranted. Myoelectric activity, fatigue and head-pelvic position data will be used descriptively to assess functional differences from baseline to completion of treatment.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • males or females
  • ages 18-65
  • chronic or recurrent neck or shoulder pain
  • pain of at least 3 months duration
  • willing to sign consent form
  • able/willing to comply with treatment schedule

Exclusion criteria

  • age over 65 years
  • clinically significant herniated disc
  • spinal fracture
  • previous electrical stimulation treatment for this episode
  • recent cervical spine or shoulder surgery
  • implanted instrumentation/prostheses
  • epilepsy
  • pregnancy
  • recent (3 months) chemotherapy/radiotherapy
  • phlebitis
  • cortisone use (30 days)
  • hypersensitivity to tape used with EMG

Treatment and study plan

InterX 5000

Device

A computer driven electrical stimulation unit that contains a cutaneous impedance sensor.

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 10 minutes

    Pain scores on the Visual Analog Scale.

  2. Neck Disability Index

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Neck Disability Index pain scores.

  3. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index

    Time frame: 60 minutes

    Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores.

  4. Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form (SF-36)

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Change in Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form (SF-36) score.

  5. Neck Walk Index

    Time frame: 20 minutes

    Change in Neck Walk Index score.

  6. Upper Limb Coordination During and Overhead Reach

    Time frame: 20 minutes

    Change in range of motion.

  7. Task Limitation (TL)/Upper Limb Function - FIT-HaNSA Protocol

    Time frame: 20 min

    Change in FIT-HaNSA score.

  8. EMG testing

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    Mean frequency shifts. Change in percentage of maximum voluntary contraction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blood and serum biomarkers

    Time frame: 20 minutes

    Change in cytokine counts.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Other

Collaborators

  • McMaster University

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Efficacy of the InterX 5000 in the Treatment of Chronic Neck and Shoulder Pain

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Jun 27, 2011
Registry last updated
Jul 25, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.