Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05243888

Efficacy of Strategies Involving Self-sampling to Reach Women Not Participating in Regular Cervical Cancer Screening

The cervical cancer screening coverage remains moderate (60%) in France. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of two experimental invitation strategies (offer of urine or vaginal self-sampling kits) to reach under-screened populations and compare them with the current invitation strategy in rural departments (low medical density and low participation rate) in France.

The study is a randomised controlled trial with three arms: a control arm (conventional invitation letter) and two experimental arms (mailing of a urine or vaginal self-sampling kit). The target population includes women aged 30-65 years, who had no screening test recorded since more than four years and who did not respond to an invitation letter within twelve months before. The primary outcome measure is the participation rate in each arm.

A team of psychologists will also investigate attitudes and experiences by semi-structured/focus-group interviews with voluntary CapU4 participants and with health professionals.

CapU4 will identify effective strategies to reach women not responding to current screening invitations and will generate information about acceptance of self-sampling among women and health professionals.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Research question: does the offer of self-sampling kits result in higher attendance to cervical cancer screening compared to sending invitation letters which recommend women to contact a health professional for taking a cervical specimen?

Systematic reviews indicate that Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing on vaginal specimens taken by the woman her-self is as accurate to detect cervical precancer as HPV testing of cervical specimens collected by a clinician, under the condition that a validated polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based HPV assay is used. Similar results are shown from recent studies where HPV testing was performed on first-void urine collected with an appropriate device and transport medium. A recent meta-analysis of randomised trials showed higher response rates when under-screened women receive a self-sampling kit at home compared to traditional invitation or reminder letters. However, the absolute participation rates are highly variable among studies. Whereas qualitative research indicates that women prefer collection of urine rather than a vaginal self-sample, no data are available that the offer of urine kits would result in higher participation among women who do not participate regularly in cervical cancer screening.

Objectives:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of two experimental invitation strategies (urine or vaginal self-sampling) to reach under-screened populations and compare them to the current invitation strategy in rural departments in France.
  • To improve the response rate among women aged 30 to 65 years (not screened over a period longer than the recommended screening interval) who did not respond to a conventional prior invitation.

Trial design:

1:1:1 randomised population-based participation trial, with 2 experimental and 1 control arm, with in each arm a 1:1 sub-randomisation with subgroup A receiving a questionnaire and subgroup B receiving no questionnaire.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • women aged between 30 and 65 years
  • living in the Departments of Mayenne, Vendée and Sarthe (Pays de la Loire, France)
  • who have not carried out a screening test (cytology of smear or HPV test) following a letter sent 12 months previously (in 2020 or 2021).

Exclusion criteria

  • recent cervical sampling (less than three years old)
  • women younger than 30 or older than 65 years
  • women who have had a hysterectomy
  • women with ongoing follow-up for a cervical lesion
  • women who are not members or beneficiaries of a social security system.

Treatment and study plan

self-sampling

Diagnostic Test

eligible women receive at their home address a self-sampling kit in addition to the conventional invitation letter

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of participation in each arm (%)

    Time frame: 6 months

    (number of responding / number of invited)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rate of participation (%)

    Time frame: 6 months

    (number of responding / number of invited). Contrast in participation between the 2 experimental arms

  2. Rate of participation (%) with questionnaire or not

    Time frame: 6 months

    (number of responding / number of invited). Contrast in participation between women that received a questionnaire or not

  3. Rate of screen test positivity (%)

    Time frame: 24 months

    Virological result. presence of high-risk HPV

  4. Percentage of women screened positive with adherence to gynecological follow-up

    Time frame: 24 months

    gynecological follow-up (cytological results)

  5. Impact of age on the participation (rate of participation %)

    Time frame: 6 months

    age

  6. Impact of age on the adherence to gynecological follow-up (% of women)

    Time frame: 24 months

    age

  7. Impact of reimbursement status on the participation (rate of participation %)

    Time frame: 6 months

    reimbursement status (benefit or not from supplementary universal health care coverage)

  8. Impact of reimbursement status on the adherence to gynecological follow-up (% of women)

    Time frame: 24 months

    reimbursement status (benefit or not from supplementary universal health care coverage)

  9. Impact of geographical area on the participation (rate of participation %)

    Time frame: 6 months

    geographical area (including the deprivation index corresponding with the statistical sector where the woman is domiciled)

  10. Impact of geographical area on the adherence to gynecological follow-up (% of women)

    Time frame: 24 months

    geographical area (geographical area (including the deprivation index corresponding with the statistical sector where the woman is domiciled)

  11. Obstacles and levers emerging from the speech of the women participating in the research (thematic analysis)

    Time frame: 24 months

    thematic analysis integrating a specific focus on the indicators identified in previous studies (e.g. lack of time, discomfort with regard to the location or bad experience encountered during another type of examination, etc.).

  12. Obstacles and levers emerging from the speech of the women participating in the research (categorical analysis)

    Time frame: 24 months

    categorical analysis based on Linguistic Inquiry and Word count which allows, among other things, to automatically categorise positive or negative emotions related to themes for example associated with the disease or beliefs

  13. Obstacles and levers emerging from the speech of the health professionals participating in the research (thematic analysis)

    Time frame: 24 months

    thematic analysis integrating a specific focus on the indicators identified in previous studies (e.g. lack of time, discomfort with regard to the location or bad experience encountered during another type of examination, etc.).

  14. Obstacles and levers emerging from the speech of the health professionals participating in the research (categorical analysis)

    Time frame: 24 months

    categorical analysis based on Linguistic Inquiry and Word count which allows, among other things, to automatically categorise positive or negative emotions related to themes for example associated with the disease or beliefs

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Regional de Coordination des Depistages des Cancer - Pays de la Loire

Other

Collaborators

  • Angers University
  • National Cancer Institute, France
  • Sciensano
  • University Hospital, Angers

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Efficacy of Strategies Involving Self-sampling to Reach Women Not Participating in Regular Cervical Cancer Screening

Acronym: CapU4

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 17, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 5, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.