solifenacin
DrugAccording to randomization.
NCT Number: NCT06551246
The primary objective is to evaluate if (1) combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses is superior to monotherapy of solifenacin in high dose and if (2) combination therapy of mirabegron and solifenacin in low doses is superior to monotherapy of mirabegron in high dose in treatment of daytime urinary incontinence among children aged 5 to 14 years who are none complete responders to respectively monotherapy of solifenacin in low dose or monotherapy of mirabegron in low dose.
In total, 236 children diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four treatment groups. Total pharmacological treatment period will be 18 weeks.
Interested in participating?
Request Info5 year–14 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
Background: According to International Children's Continence Society, first-line treatment of children with daytime urinary incontinence is standard urotherapy, eventually followed by pharmacotherapy of anticholinergics. The effect of medical treatment is sparsely investigated and primarily in non-randomized trials.
Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate if (1) combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses is superior to monotherapy of solifenacin in high dose and if (2) combination therapy of mirabegron and solifenacin in low doses is superior to monotherapy of mirabegron in high dose in treatment of daytime urinary incontinence among children aged 5 to 14 years who are none complete responders to respectively monotherapy of solifenacin in low dose or monotherapy of mirabegron in low dose.
The secondary objective is to evaluate the treatment response of combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses, monotherapy in high dose and monotherapy in low doses as supplementary comparisons. Additionally, the secondary objective is to evaluate side effects, safety, and tolerability of the medical treatment as well as the effect of treatment on well-being and quality of life.
Study design: The BeDry study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Included children will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four treatment groups. Children aged 5-14 years diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence refractory to standard urotherapy will be randomized. Initially two groups will receive solifenacin 5 mg and two groups will receive mirabegron 25 mg. After 6 weeks, non-complete respondsers will receive add-on treatment according to their primary randomization group; group 1A will reviece solifenacin 5 mg and add-on solifenacin 5 mg, group 1B will receive solifenacin 5 mg and add-on mirabegron 25 mg, group 2A will receive mirabegron 25 mg and add-on mirabegron 25 mg, group 2B will receive mirabegron 25 mg and add-on solifenacin 5 mg. Total treatment period will be 18 weeks. The primary endpoint measure is treatment response assessed by change from visit 2 to end of study, according to number of wet days pr. 7 days by DryPie.
Perspectives: The trial has the potential to optimize medical treatment of children with daytime urinary incontinence, to shorten the treatment period, diminish side effects and minimized unnecessary medical expenses.
Ethics: All pharmacological side effects will be handled in accordance with the Danish legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to urotherapy, medical treatment or withdrawal. No risks are expected by the clinical examination and paraclinical measurements. The therapeutic potential for future patients justifies the project to be carried out. Participation in this study will not lead to any disadvantages for the patient in their treatment. The study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol, applicable regulatory requirements according to Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study is approved by the authorities. Significant additions or changes to the protocol may be conducted after the application for amendment is approved by the Regulatory Authority and the Ethics Committee. Information regarding the participants is protected according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the actual law. The study is registered at the research inventory of the Regions of Denmark (1-16-02-210-24) and at Aarhus University (ARG-2024-731-23829). The study is registered and authorized at CTIS (EU CT 2023-510187-13-00).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
According to randomization.
According to randomization.
Time frame: From study week 6 and through study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
Assesed by change in number of wetdays pr. 7 days by DryPie
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
Assesed by change in number of wetdays pr. 7 days by DryPie
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
Assesed by DryPie (scoring from 0 to 21, in which the higher score means severe incontinence)
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
Quantified by Bower VAS Urgency Scheme (scoring from 0 to 10, in which the higher score means servere urge)
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
48-hour frequency-volume chart
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
Maximum voided volume as a percent of expected bladder capacity
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
48-hour frequency-volume chart
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
48-hour frequency-volume chart
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
20-item questionnaire (scoring from 0 to 4 on a Likert scale, with a total of 80 points in which the higher score, the greater impact of urinary incontinence of quality of life)
Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total
5-item questionnaire (scoring from 0 to 5 on a Likert scale, with a total of 30 points in which the higher score, the greater impact of urinary incontinence of quality of life)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD
CONTACT
Luise Borch, MD, PhD
CONTACT
University of Aarhus
Other
Efficacy of Solifenacin, Mirabegron and Combination Therapy in Children With Overactive Bladder and Daytime Urinary Incontinence (BeDry)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06465576
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Aalborg, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT05299827
Lower Extremity Problem, Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05878951
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06336304
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Hanover, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details