Secukinumab
BiologicalEligible subjects are randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio
Other names: AIN457
NCT Number: NCT04632927
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of secukinumab and ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who showed failure to previous TNFα-inhibitor treatment
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–99 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Novartis Investigative Site, Rendsburg, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Eligible subjects are randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio
Other names: AIN457
Eligible subjects are randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The disability assessment component of the HAQ evaluated a subject's level of functional ability through 20 questions grouped into 8 categories: dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. Each item began with the prompt "Over the past week, are you able to…" and is scored on a 4-point scale: 0 (no difficulty), 1 (some difficulty), 2 (much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do). The overall score was calculated by averaging the scores across all answered domains, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (severe disability).
A HAQ-DI response was defined as an improvement of ≥0.35 points from baseline at Week 28. Missing values were imputed as non-responders
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was a composite measure that evaluates the average severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation of psoriatic lesions-each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (severe)-across four body regions: head, upper limbs, trunk (including groin), and lower limbs (to the top of the buttocks). These scores were weighted by the area of skin involvement in each region to generate a total PASI score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity.
The number of participants who achieved at least a 90% reduction in PASI score from baseline at Week 28 was assessed. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The patient's level of pain was evaluated using a horizontal Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), on which individuals marked their pain intensity with a vertical tick. The scale ranged from 0 mm (indicating "no pain") to 100 mm (indicating "unbearable pain").
The change in the patient's pain assessment on the VAS from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Tender joint count (TJC) 68 was a method of assessing joint inflammation. Number of tender joints was determined by examining 68 joints and identifying the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The 68 joints assessed for tenderness included the 2 temporomandibular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 acromioclavicular joints, 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal, 8 distal interphalangeal joints of the hands, 2 hips, 2 knees, 2 talo¬tibial, 2 mid-tarsal, 10 metatarsophalangeal, and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet.
The change from baseline in TJC68 at Week 28 was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
Swollen Joint Count (SJC) 66 was a method of assessing joint inflammation. The number of swollen joints was determined by examining 66 joints and identifying those with visible or palpable swelling suggestive of synovitis. The 66 joints assessed for swelling included the 2 sternoclavicular, 2 acromioclavicular joints, 2 shoulders, 2 elbows, 2 wrists, 10 metacarpophalangeal, 10 proximal interphalangeal, 8 distal interphalangeal joints of the hands, 2 knees, 2 talotibial, 2 mid-tarsal, 10 metatarsophalangeal, and 10 proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet.
The change from baseline in SJC66 at Week 28 was assessed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Bseline, Week 28
The PASI was a composite measure that evaluates the average severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation of psoriatic lesions-each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (severe)-across four body regions: head, upper limbs, trunk (including groin), and lower limbs (to the top of the buttocks). These scores were weighted by the area of skin involvement in each region to generate a total PASI score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity.
The number of participants who achieved 100% reduction in PASI score from baseline at Week 28 was assessed. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was a composite measure that evaluates the average severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation of psoriatic lesions-each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (severe)-across four body regions: head, upper limbs, trunk (including groin), and lower limbs (to the top of the buttocks). These scores were weighted by the area of skin involvement in each region to generate a total PASI score ranging from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe disease activity.
The number of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction in PASI score from baseline at Week 28 was assessed. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was performed using a 100 mm (VAS) ranging from 0 (='very good') to 100 (='very poor') after the question 'Considering all the ways Psoriatic Arthritis affects you, please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line how well you are today'.
The change in the patient's global assessment on the VAS from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The patient's assessment of psoriasis and arthritis was performed using a 100 mm VAS ranging from 0 (='Excellent') to 100 (='Poor') after the question 'Considering all the ways PSORIASIS and ARTHRITIS affects you, please indicate with a vertical mark through the horizontal line how well you are doing over the past week'
The change in the patient's global assessment of psoriasis and arthritis disease activity on the VAS from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 28
MDA was a composite endpoint used to assess low disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis. A patient was considered to have achieved MDA if they met at least 5 of the following 7 criteria:
The number of participants achieving MDA at Week 28 was assessed. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The LEI was a validated enthesitis index that used six sites to evaluate enthesitis: the left and right lateral epicondyles of the humerus, the left and right proximal Achilles tendon insertions, and the left and right medial femoral condyles.Each site was scored as 0 (non-tender) or 1 (tender), resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 6. A higher score reflected a greater burden of enthesitis.
The change in the LEI score from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in enthesitis severity
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The LDI was used to quantitatively assess dactylitis by measuring the circumference of affected digits and their corresponding control digits, along with the tenderness of each affected digit. Digits were classified as dactylitic if there was a ≥10% difference in circumference compared to the contralateral digit. When both digits were affected or a contralateral control was unavailable, a standardized reference range was applied.
For each dactylitic digit, the ratio of the affected to control circumference was multiplied by a binary tenderness score (1 = tender, 0 = non-tender). The resulting values were summed across all affected digits to calculate the total LDI score. Scores ranged from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more severe or widespread dactylitis.
The change in the LDI score from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in dactylitis severity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The PsAQoL questionnaire was used to assess the impact of psoriatic arthritis on patients' quality of life. The PsAQoL is a validated, disease-specific, self-administered instrument consisting of 20 items with binary response options ("true" or "not true"). Items covered physical, emotional, and social domains, including fatigue, independence, and interpersonal relationships. The total score ranged from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life.
The change in the PsAQoL score from baseline to Week 28 was analyzed. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in health-related quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 28
The FACIT-Fatigue Scale was used to assess fatigue and its impact on daily functioning over the previous 7 days. The instrument consisted of 13 self-administered items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"). The total score ranged from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue and better functioning.
Response was achieved if the score had improved by at least 4 points from baseline. Missing values were imputed as non-responders
Time frame: Week 28
The DLQI was used to evaluate the impact of dermatological conditions on patients' quality of life over the previous 7 days. It consisted of 10 self-administered items covering symptoms, daily activities, leisure, work/school, personal relationships, and treatment burden. Each item was scored from 0 ("Not at all") to 3 ("Very much"), with a total score ranging from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicated greater impairment.
Response was achieved if the absolute score was either 0 or 1. Missing values were imputed as non-responders.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Industry
A 28-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Subcutaneously Administered Secukinumab Compared to Ustekinumab in Adult Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Failure of TNFα- Inhibitor Treatment (AgAIN)
Acronym: AgAIN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05616871
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03895203
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03896581
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04009499
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details