Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03704610

Efficacy of Remission-induction Regimen With Infliximab for Severe Extrathoracic Sarcoidosis (EFIRTES)

The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of infliximab in a 2-period study :

* An initial period with comparison of infliximab versus placebo and allowing the determination of the primary criteria * Then an extension period in which the 2 arms will receive infliximab (in the placebo group : 5 perfusions and in the experimental group 3 supplemental perfusions). Finally, the 2 groups will receive 5 injections of infliximab There is little evidence in the literature of when and how infliximab should be administered in sarcoidosis. We hypothesized, from our personal experience in 30 cases (18 of which were reported in a retrospective trial (14), that infliximab would have a very quick activity. So it appeared reasonable to evaluate the primary criterion at 6 weeks after initiation of the treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Hopital Avicenne - service de pnaumologie, Bobigny, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause . Sarcoidosis is chronic and progressive in 25 % of the patients. Although mediastinal lymph nodes and lung are the most frequently sites affected, extrathoracic localizations may occur. In particular, cardiac or neurological localizations are frequently associated with a chronic disease, with subsequent morbidity and mortality. Such patients require long term therapy to avoid organ dysfunction which may occur with fibrosis.

If cyclophosphamide remains the "historical" treatment to treat resistant sarcoidosis, it can present serious adverse effects such as infections and gonadic toxicity which may be a problem in young people. As infliximab has demonstrated a real efficacy in resistant sarcoidosis, we challenged that it could be a valuable option for resistant extra-thoracic sarcoidosis.

The population studied will be the patients with clinical and radiological presentation concordant with sarcoidosis

This study is a phase 3, randomized, controlled, parallel group trial, designed to assess the efficacy of infliximab in a 2-period study :

In the first part, patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either infliximab or placebo. Both patients and investigators will be blind regarding study treatment. Concomitantly, patients will be treated with usual care (i.e. steroids at the dose of 0.5 mg/kg/d with a program of tapering dose).

In the second open-labelled part, all the patients will receive infliximab treatment, steroids tapering regimen and low-dose methotrexate left to the investigator choice or, in case of contra-indication, azathioprine.

Finally, the 2 groups will receive 5 injections of infliximab

Infliximab will be used at a dose of 5 mg/kg at D1,D15 then every 4 weeks because in our experience, extrathoracic severe localization require such dosage and may be resistant to the low dosage (3 mg/kg). This dosage is also the dose usually recommended for extra-thoracic localizations.

Disease activity and ePOST score will be evaluated at the inclusion, W6 and after 5 injections (2 weeks after W20 for placebo group or W14 for experimental group). Severity assessment score (ePOST score) will be assessed by the physician in charge of the patient. This score reflects the sarcoidosis activity in 17 organs and has been validated in previous studies.

Remission at week 6 will be defined as: Percentage of patients who have a severity assessment score (ePOST score) inferior to 1 in all organs and absence of hypercalcemia at W6, whatever the corticosteroid dosage received.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical and radiological presentation confirming sarcoidosis
  • Presence of non caseating granuloma in at least one organ
  • Presence of at least one extrathoracic localization, including hypercalcemia
  • Exclusion of other causes of granuloma
  • Presence of serious organ involvement or relapse/apparition of a new localization despite a first-line immunosuppressive drug
  • Age superior or equal to 18 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy or breast feeding or women in age of pregnancy without efficient contraception
  • Patients with multiple sclerosis
  • Patients with prior history of any cancer in the 5 years before inclusion (except for cutaneous basocellular cancers),
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to infliximab to other murine proteins, or to any of the excipients
  • Patients with untreated tuberculosis or current other severe infections such as sepsis, abscesses, and opportunistic infections• Patients with moderate or severe heart failure (NYHA class III/IV)
  • Concurrent vaccination with live vaccines during therapy
  • Inability to understand information about the protocol
  • Adult subject under legal protection or unable to consent.
  • No informed consent
  • Absence of affiliation to National French social security system
  • Patients with severe renal failure, severe hepatic impairment, hepatocellular insufficiency, chronic respiratory insufficiency, risk of angle closure glaucoma, risk of urinary retention related to urethroprostatic disorders, certain evolving viral diseases (including hepatitis, herpes, varicella, zoster), psychotic states still not controlled by treatment

Treatment and study plan

Infliximab

Drug

An initial period with 2 injections with infliximab allowing the determination of the primary criteria Then an extension with infliximab with 3 supplementary perfusions

Placebo

Drug

An initial period with 2 injections with placebo allowing the determination of the primary criteria Then an extension with infliximab with 5 supplementary perfusions

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients

    Time frame: week 6

    who have a severity assessment score (ePOST score) inferior to 1 in all organs and absence of hypercalcemia at W6, whatever the corticosteroid dosage received

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of patients

    Time frame: week 16 for experimental arm ; week 22 for control arm

    who will have completed the steroid tapering regimen, will have a severity assessment score (ePOST score) < 1 in all organs, absence of hypercalcemia, had not have a relapse or any reason for treatment failure

  2. Mean variation in severity assessment score measured by extrapulmonary Physician Organ Severity Tool (ePOST)

    Time frame: Week 6

    ePOST score will be assessed by the physician in charge of the patient. This score reflects the sarcoidosis activity in 17 organs and has been validated in previous studies : Skin, Peripheral lymph nodes, Eyes, Liver, Spleen, Central nervous system, Peripheral nervous system, Parotid/salivary glands, Bone marrow, Ear, Nose, Throat, Cardiac, Renal, Bone/joint, Muscle, Gastrointestinal. For each organ, a score will : 0 as Not affected, 1 as Slight, 2 as Mild, 3 as Moderate, 4 as Moderate to severe, 5 as Severe and 6 as Very severe. Total score is the sum of score in each organ.

  3. Pulmonary sarcoidosis involvement

    Time frame: Week 6

    Pulmonary sarcoidosis involvement will be assessed by the physician in charge of the patient rated as: 0 as Not affected, 1 as Slight, 2 as Mild, 3 as Moderate, 4 as Moderate to severe, 5 as Severe and 6 as Very severe.

  4. Pulmonary sarcoidosis involvement 2 weeks after the 5th injection

    Time frame: week 16 for experimental arm ; week 22 for control arm

    Pulmonary sarcoidosis involvement will be assessed by the physician in charge of the patient rated as: 0 as Not affected, 1 as Slight, 2 as Mild, 3 as Moderate, 4 as Moderate to severe, 5 as Severe and 6 as Very severe.

  5. Severity assessment score measured by ePOST 2 weeks after the 5th injection

    Time frame: week 16 for experimental arm ; week 22 for control arm

    ePOST score will be assessed by the physician in charge of the patient. This score reflects the sarcoidosis activity in 17 organs and has been validated in previous studies : Skin, Peripheral lymph nodes, Eyes, Liver, Spleen, Central nervous system, Peripheral nervous system, Parotid/salivary glands, Bone marrow, Ear, Nose, Throat, Cardiac, Renal, Bone/joint, Muscle, Gastrointestinal. For each organ, a score will : 0 as Not affected, 1 as Slight, 2 as Mild, 3 as Moderate, 4 as Moderate to severe, 5 as Severe and 6 as Very severe. Total score is the sum of score in each organ

  6. Mean variation in the severity assessment score measured by ePOST from 1st injection (W0 or W6) to 2 weeks after the 5th injection

    Time frame: week 16 for experimental arm ; week 22 for control arm

    ePOST score will be assessed by the physician in charge of the patient. This score reflects the sarcoidosis activity in 17 organs and has been validated in previous studies : Skin, Peripheral lymph nodes, Eyes, Liver, Spleen, Central nervous system, Peripheral nervous system, Parotid/salivary glands, Bone marrow, Ear, Nose, Throat, Cardiac, Renal, Bone/joint, Muscle, Gastrointestinal. For each organ, a score will : 0 as Not affected, 1 as Slight, 2 as Mild, 3 as Moderate, 4 as Moderate to severe, 5 as Severe and 6 as Very severe. Total score is the sum of score in each organ.

  7. Mean variation of quality of life measured by SF-36

    Time frame: Week 6

    The SF-36 questionnaire is a quality of life questionnaire that includes 36 questions divided into 8 different categories (physical functioning, limitations due to physical condition, physical pain, perceived health, vitality, social functioning or well-being, limitations due to mental condition, mental health). It is self-administered and takes less than 10 minutes. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Score from 0 to 100.

  8. Mean variation of fatigue, measured by the Fatigue Scale (FAS)

    Time frame: Week 6

    The total score ranges from 10 to 50. A total FAS score < 22 indicates no fatigue, a score ≥ 22 indicates fatigue

  9. Mean variation of quality of life measured by SF-36

    Time frame: week 16 for experimental arm ; week 22 for control arm

    The SF-36 questionnaire is a quality of life questionnaire that includes 36 questions divided into 8 different categories (physical functioning, limitations due to physical condition, physical pain, perceived health, vitality, social functioning or well-being, limitations due to mental condition, mental health). It is self-administered and takes less than 10 minutes. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Score from 0 to 100.

  10. Mean variation of fatigue, measured by the Fatigue Scale (FAS)

    Time frame: week 16 for experimental arm ; week 22 for control arm

    The total score ranges from 10 to 50. A total FAS score < 22 indicates no fatigue, a score ≥ 22 indicates fatigue

  11. Rate of relapses

    Time frame: week 16 for experimental arm ; week 22 for control arm

    A relapse will be defined by the apparition of a new localization or a majoration of the severity assessment score from the previous assessment in at least one organ among the 17 studied in the ePOST score, after a previous 1 point or more decrease without hypercalcemia.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of Remission-induction Regimen With Infliximab for Severe Extrathoracic Sarcoidosis (EFIRTES STUDY)

Acronym: EFIRTES

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Oct 15, 2018
Registry last updated
Feb 7, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.