Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07336992

Efficacy of Prophylactic Levetiracetam for Improving Functional Outcome in the Acute Phase of Intracerebral Haemorrhage: a Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Trial

Epileptic seizures are a common complication at the acute phase of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). The incidence of seizures occurring within 7 days reaches 40% when subclinical seizures are diagnosed by continuous electroencephalogram (EEG).

Some studies have suggested that early seizures are associated with haematoma expansion (Vespa., Neurology 2003), worse neurological outcomes (Gilmore., Stroke 2016) or increased mortality. By contrast, other studies have shown no association of acute seizures with long-term mortality and outcome. However, the interpretation of these works is subject to bias because almost all studies were based on clinical detection of seizures only, while it has been shown that most early seizures after ICH are clinically unrecognised and can only be diagnosed with EEG monitoring.

The PEACH trial, a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, showed that clinical and/or electrographic seizures occur in more than 40% of patients with ICH and that Levetiracetam (LVT) is safe and effective in preventing these seizures. However, it remains unclear whether preventing acute seizures might lead to improved functional outcomes after ICH. An adequately powered randomised controlled trial is needed to answer whether primary seizure prophylaxis improves functional outcome in this setting. Answering this question would result in an important change in ICH acute care guidelines, which currently do not recommend primary prophylactic antiseizure treatment. As compared to research in acute ischemic stroke management, fewer clinical trials have been conducted in acute ICH and no effective medical treatments are available in this subset of patients.

The main objective of PEACH 2 is to establish if prophylactic antiseizure therapy with LVT improves functional outcome in adults with acute spontaneous ICH. Functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin score (mRS score) six months after acute ICH will be compared between patients receiving prophylactic antiseizure therapy with levetiracetam and patients receiving placebo.

The secondary objectives are to examine the effect of prophylactic antiseizure therapy with levetiracetam versus placebo on:

* the number of early and late clinical seizures, on the short term and long term evolution of the neurologic deficit as assessed by the NIHSS, on long term functional outcome (12 months) as assessed by the mRS, on quality of life and cognitive impairment, and on haematoma expansion and mass effect on control brain imaging * the frequency of side effects at 1 and 6 months, pneumonia at 1 month, delirium at 1 month, anxiety and depression at 1 and 6 months, and all-cause mortality at 1, 6 and 12 months.

580 patients will be recruited over 3 years.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Bron, 69500, France

Location contact

Caroline ARQUIZAN

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Charlotte Cordonnier

SUB_INVESTIGATOR

Fabrice VUILLIER

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Frédéric PHILIPPEAU

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Gaspard GERSCHENFELD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Igor SIBON

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Julien COCHEZ

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karine BLANC-LASSERRE

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Laurent DEREX, Dr

CONTACT

[email protected]

04 72 35 78 09

Laurent SUISSA

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nathalie Perreton, CP

CONTACT

[email protected]

04 27 85 63 04

Nicolas RAPOSO

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Olivier DETANTE

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pierre GARNIER

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Serkan CAKMAK

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Yannick BEJOT

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Spontaneous (non-traumatic) supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage diagnosed by brain CT or MRI
  • Onset of neurologic symptoms within 24 hours
  • NIHSS score on admission ≤ 25
  • Informed consent given by the patient or his/her legal representative
  • Patients benefiting from a social insurance system or a similar system

Exclusion criteria

  • Intracerebral haemorrhage known or suspected by study investigator to be secondary to trauma, vascular malformation, haemorrhagic transformation of ischaemic stroke, or tumour
  • Current use of antiseizure drugs or history of epilepsy
  • Severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Previous history of severe depression or psychotic disorder
  • Known terminal illness
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to levetiracetam
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to microcrystalline cellulose or lactose
  • Being under legal protection

Treatment and study plan

Treatment administration (Levetiracetam or placebo)

Drug

Treatment should be initiated within 24 hours of randomisation. It will be administered intravenously for at least 48 hours and then the route of administration will be changed to oral administration at the same dosage after assessment of swallowing function. The treatment period will be 30 days at full dose, followed by a gradual tapering over 2 weeks.

Neuroimaging

Radiation

Neuroimaging (brain CT or MRI) will be performed 72h post inclusion

National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

Diagnostic Test

NIHSS, a clinician -reported 11-items stroke-specific severity scale, will be administered by a neurologist during all patients' study visits except at visits 1 month and 12 months.

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

Behavioral

This questionnaire will be administered 3 time, at inclusion, 6 months and 12 months to measure post-stroke functional status and disability

Euroqol test (EQ-5D-5L)

Behavioral

This self-reported questionnaire will be completed by patients at 6 and 12 months, to assess the multidimensional chronic consequences of stroke on their daily lives

MOntreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

Behavioral

This test will be administered by a neurologist at 6 months to assess patients' cognitive impairment

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)

Behavioral

This self-reported questionnaire will be completed by patients at 6 months, to assess patient's cognitive function (memory, attention, concentration, language, and thinking abilities)

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Behavioral

This questionnaire will be administered at 6 months to evaluate patients' anxiety and depression

Primary outcomes

  1. modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score to measure the functional status (death or dependency).

    Time frame: 6 months after inclusion

    The mRS score will be measured by a certified neurologist, blinded to the patient study group.

    It categorises disability with reference to pre-stroke activities. mRS is a single-item scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).

    Its analysis will be performed by an ordinal logistic regression model with proportional odds and mixed effects. The treatment arm will be introduced in the model as fixed effect and the NIHSS score (≤ 15 vs >15) will be taken into account as a fixed effect. It will also take into account, as random effect, a random intercept by centre.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of clinical seizures

    Time frame: within 72 hours after inclusion

  2. Number of clinical seizures

    Time frame: at 1 month after inclusion

  3. Number of clinical seizures

    Time frame: at 6 months after inclusion

  4. Number of clinical seizures

    Time frame: at 12 months after inclusion

  5. Change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, 11 items version) score between inclusion and 72 h, and 6 months.

    Time frame: At inclusion

    The NIHSS is a clinician -reported 11-items stroke-specific severity scale. This scale ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater severity

  6. Change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, 11 items version) score between inclusion and 72 h, and 6 months.

    Time frame: At 72 hours

    The NIHSS is a clinician -reported 11-items stroke-specific severity scale. This scale ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater severity

  7. Change in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS, 11 items version) score between inclusion and 72 h, and 6 months.

    Time frame: At 6 months after inclusion

    The NIHSS is a clinician -reported 11-items stroke-specific severity scale. This scale ranges from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater severity

  8. Change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between inclusion and 6 months and 12 months

    Time frame: At inclusion

    It categorises disability with reference to pre-stroke activities. mRS is a single-item scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).

  9. Change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between inclusion and 6 months and 12 months

    Time frame: At 6 months after inclusion

    It categorises disability with reference to pre-stroke activities. mRS is a single-item scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).

  10. Change in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between inclusion and 6 months and 12 months

    Time frame: At 12 months after inclusion

    It categorises disability with reference to pre-stroke activities. mRS is a single-item scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 5 (severe disability) and 6 (death).

  11. Score at the Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) to assess quality of life.

    Time frame: At 6 months

    The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 5 items. The response to each item is based on a Likert scale rated from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (inability), with a higher score reflecting worse autonomy. In addition, a question is asked about how the patients perceive their current health on a scale of 0 to 100.

    An algorithm generates scores for each domain from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 corresponding to worse health and a score of 100 corresponding to greater health.

  12. Score at the Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) to assess quality of life.

    Time frame: At 12 months after inclusion

    The EQ-5D-5L is a self-reported questionnaire composed of 5 items. The response to each item is based on a Likert scale rated from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (inability), with a higher score reflecting worse autonomy. In addition, a question is asked about how the patients perceive their current health on a scale of 0 to 100.

    An algorithm generates scores for each domain from 0 to 100, with a score of 0 corresponding to worse health and a score of 100 corresponding to greater health.

  13. Score at the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) version 8.3 to assess cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: 6 months after inclusion

    This 30-point scale assesses visual-constructive functions, executive functions, short-term memory, attention, language, and temporo-spatial orientation. The score is pathological when it is strictly below 26/30.

  14. Change in intracerebral haemorrhage volume (cc)

    Time frame: 72 hours after inclusion

    This change is defined as change in intracerebral haemorrhage volume between baseline brain imaging and control brain imaging at 72 hours

  15. Frequency of pneumonia

    Time frame: 1 month after inclusion

  16. Frequency of side effects related to treatment

    Time frame: 1 month after inclusion

  17. Frequency of side effects related to treatment

    Time frame: 6 months after inclusion

  18. Frequency of delirium

    Time frame: 1 month after inclusion

  19. Score at the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to assess anxiety and depression

    Time frame: At 6 months after inclusion

    This scale has 14 items scored from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety and seven to depression, resulting in two scores with a maximum score of 21 for each. A score of 7 or less indicates no symptomatology, 8 to 10: doubtful symptomatology, and 11 and above: definite symptomatology.

  20. Death rate

    Time frame: At 1 month after inclusion

  21. Death rate

    Time frame: At 6 months after inclusion

  22. Death rate

    Time frame: At 12 months after inclusion

  23. Score at the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)

    Time frame: At 6 months after inclusion

    This scale is a self-report questionnaire composed of 37-item assesses memory, attention, concentration, language, and thinking abilities. The FACT-Cog takes into consideration the functional implications of cognitive impairment, the deficits observed by other people, the changes in cognitive function over time, and their impact on the patient's quality of life. Scoring for the FACT-Cog includes calculation of four subscales based on a 5-point Likert scale (from never/not at all (0) to several times a day/very much) : Perceived Cognitive Impairment (20 items; score range 0-80), Impact On Quality Of Life (4 items; score range 0-16), Comments From Others (4 items; score range 0-16), and Perceived Cognitive Abilities (9 items; score range 0-36). The higher the score is, the better the quality of life is.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Laurent Derex, DR

CONTACT

[email protected]

04 72 35 78 09

Nathalie Perreton, CP

CONTACT

[email protected]

04 27 85 63 04

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Other

Registry information

Acronym: PEACH2

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jan 13, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.