Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03203408

Efficacy of OSTENIL PLUS (Hyaluronic Acid) Versus SYNVISC-ONE in Patients With Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis

The main objective of the study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of OSTENIL PLUS compared to that of a single intra-articular injection of the reference product SYNVISC-ONE in the treatment of symptomatic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. The primary endpoint was the change in mean score on the WOMAC pain scales from D0 to D180.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

After a period of washout-out for NSAIDs, the patients received a single intra-articular injection of OSTENIL PLUS or of SYNVISC-ONE in the most painful knee. The study involved a preselection visit at D-7 and five further visits: at D0 (baseline, evaluation before intra-articular injection), at D2 ± 2 days (injection), at D30 ± 15 days, at D90 ± 15 days and C5 at D180 ± 15 days.

To enrol the patients as quickly as possible, 129 sites, i.e. general medical or rheumatology practices, were open. After verifying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the evaluating investigators assigned a randomisation number based on the chronological order of inclusion of patients at their site. The patient was then sent to the injecting investigator so that he/she could give the injection of the product corresponding to the randomisation number.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female aged 40-85 years;
  • Primary knee osteoarthritis complying with the American College or Rheumatology criteria;
  • Radiographically defined osteoarthritis: joint space narrowing and osteophyte in X-ray taken less than one year previously and modified Kellgren-Lawrence grade Ib-III;
  • Symptoms on one side only, with a mean WOMAC A of ≥40 mm. If knee osteoarthritis is bilateral, a difference for that score between the contralateral knee and the selected knee should be of at least 20 mm;
  • Pain present on at least 15 days in the month before inclusion;
  • Failure or intolerance of first line analgesics and NSAIDs;
  • With health insurance;
  • Understanding and following the study instructions;
  • Signed the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Knee osteoarthritis that is not symptomatic or insufficiently symptomatic;
  • Bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis of the same severity on both sides;
  • Post-traumatic secondary knee osteoarthritis;
  • Knee osteoarthritis of radiographic grade I, Ia or IV;
  • Exclusively patellofemoral osteoarthritis where the symptoms are principally of patellofemoral origin (Patellar syndrome);
  • Symptomatic homolateral coxarthrosis;
  • Varus or valgus deformation of the selected knee (deformation axis ≥15° in X-ray);
  • Inflammatory rheumatism (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic rheumatism, articular chondrocalcinosis, gout, Paget's disease, ankylosing spondylitis, lupus, etc.);
  • History of injury to the selected knee during the 6 months before inclusion;
  • Venous or lymphatic stenosis of the lower limb;
  • Femoral or sciatic nerve root pain of the lower limb to be tested;
  • Tendinopathy (e.g. hip periarthritis);
  • Treatment with intra-articular hyaluronic acid in the selected knee during the 6 months before inclusion;
  • Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids in the selected knee during the 2 months before inclusion;
  • Treatment with symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis and/or dietary supplements for osteoarthritis (chondroitin sulphate, diacerein, avocado and soybean unsaponifiables, oxaceprol, copper granions, glucosamine) which had been started less than 3 months previously or whose dose had been changed during the last 3 months before inclusion;
  • Total knee replacement of the selected knee;
  • Surgery of the other knee or of the hip or any other surgery scheduled during the period of the study;
  • History of any surgical intervention, arthroscopy, osteotomy, etc. in the year before inclusion;
  • Obesity: body mass index ≥30 kg/m2;
  • History of autoimmune disease;
  • Severe condition likely to interfere with the evaluation, such as neoplasia, malignant blood disease, kidney disease, liver disease or severe infection;
  • Very marked hydrarthrosis (requiring puncture) at the time of inclusion;
  • Wound or skin condition of the selected knee;
  • Anticoagulant treatment with heparin or warfarin (platelet antiaggregants such as ASPIRIN ≤325 mg/d, ticlopidine or clopidogrel were allowed);
  • Known hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid and/or to avian proteins and/or paracetamol;
  • Known hypersensitivity to mannitol;
  • Participation in a clinical research study within the previous 3 months;
  • Pregnancy, breast-feeding.

Treatment and study plan

OSTENIL PLUS

Device

Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee

Synvisc-One

Device

Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in WOMAC A

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 180

    Change from baseline in the pain subscore (section A) of the WOMAC score

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lequesne algofunctional index

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 180

    Index assessing the severity of osteoarthritis

  2. WOMAC B

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 180

    Stiffness subscore (section B) of the WOMAC score

  3. WOMAC C

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 180

    Function subscore (section C) of the WOMAC score

  4. Patient's overall status score in relation to his/her knee osteoarthritis

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 180

    Visual analogue scale assessed by the patient

  5. Assessment of overall treatment efficacy by the patient

    Time frame: Day 30 to Day 180

    5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor)

  6. Assessment of overall treatment efficacy by the investigator

    Time frame: Day 30 to Day 180

    5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor)

Other outcomes

  1. Incidence of all adverse events

    Time frame: Day 0 to Day 180

    Recording of all adverse events and changes in concomitant treatments

  2. Incidence of local adverse reactions

    Time frame: Day 30

    Recording of adverse manifestations such as post-injection pain, inflammatory reaction, presence of hydrarthrosis, presence of acute pseudoseptic or septic arthritis

  3. Assessment of local treatment tolerability by the patient

    Time frame: Day 30

    5-point scale scale (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3= moderate, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor)

  4. Assessment of local treatment tolerability by the investigator

    Time frame: Day 30

    5-point scale scale (1 = very good, 2 = good, 3= moderate, 4 = poor, 5 = very poor)

  5. Assessment of overall treatment tolerability by the investigator

    Time frame: Day 30 to Day 180

    5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor)

  6. Assessment of overall treatment tolerability by the patient

    Time frame: Day 30 to Day 180

    5-point scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = moderate; 4 = poor; 5 = very poor)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

TRB Chemedica

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of OSTENIL PLUS (Hyaluronic Acid) Versus SYNVISC-ONE in Patients With Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis. A Randomised, Controlled, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study With a 6-month Follow-up

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jun 29, 2017
Registry last updated
Oct 11, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.