Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
NCT Number: NCT01076257
This research centers on the comparison of the immediate efficacy (right after therapy) and the maintained efficacy (3 months and 6 months) between "Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy" (mCIMT) group and control group at different age.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 year–15 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
"Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy" is one of the most recent treatments for children with Brain damage.
This well-designed and follow-up RCT study compared home-based CIT with a control intervention (traditional rehabilitation, TR) by combining kinematic analysis and clinical evaluation, which is possible to examine whether functional improvement is accompanied by a change in motor control. We hypothesized that home-based CIT would induce better motor control strategies (shorter RT, MT, lesser MUs, MGA, and PMGA, and larger peak velocity (PV)) for greater functional gains than TR. Furthermore, the beneficial effects would be maintained at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Findings of this study allow clinicians to understand the underlying motor control changes for functional improvement after home-based CIT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Home based CIT
Other names: Constraint-Induced Therapy, Forced-use Therapy, Immobilization Therapy
Time frame: 4 weeks (post-treatment), 12 week, 24 week
All children underwent a series of upper limb assessments, including kinematic analysis and functional measures (primary and secondary outcomes), before the start of the intervention (pretreatment). An occupational therapist blinded to group assignment was trained to administer these measures. All participants underwent these assessments at 4 weeks immediately after intervention (post-treatment), and at 12-week follow-up and 24-week follow-up.
Time frame: 4 weeks (post-treatment), 12 week, 24 week
Time frame: 4 weeks (post-treatment), 12 week, 24 week
Time frame: 4 weeks (post-treatment), 12 week, 24 week
All children underwent a series of upper limb assessments, including kinematic analysis and functional measures (primary and secondary outcomes), before the start of the intervention (pretreatment). An occupational therapist blinded to group assignment was trained to administer these measures. All participants underwent these assessments at 4 weeks immediately after intervention (post-treatment), and at 12-week follow-up and 24-week follow-up.
Time frame: 4 weeks (post-treatment), 12 week, 24 week
Time frame: 4 weeks (post-treatment), 12 week, 24 week
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Other
Efficacy of Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy in Children With Brain Damage: Evidence of Kinematic Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05134116
Brain Damage, Brain Damage, Chronic
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT04546737
Brain Damage, Brain Diseases
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05399602
Brain Damage, Brain Diseases
Hradec Králové, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT04288505
Brain Damage, Brain Diseases
Angers, France
View Trial Details