Urology and Nephrology center
Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04437108
comparing the outcome of low-intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT) versus solifenacin on persistent storage symptoms after transurethral surgery for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, 35516, Egypt
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in aging men including both voiding and storage symptoms. After prostatectomy, 20-30% of the patients still have persistent storage symptoms. The pathophysiology of persistent storage symptoms after surgical relief of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) remains unclear. It may be due to bladder changes produced by long standing bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) including bladder ischemia and denervation or it may be related to other factors rather than preoperative BOO such as aging, chronic inflammation or a subtle neurological disorder.
After exclusion of urinary tract infection (UTI) and BOO, antimuscarinics are the commonly used medications for post-prostatectomy persistent storage symptoms. However, these medications are associated with side effects which may interfere with the patient compliance.
Low-intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT) is a non invasive procedure that has a beneficial effect in promoting revascularization and enhancing tissue regeneration. It has been applied to the penis for erectile dysfunction and to the perineum for chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) with encouraging results. In a rat model, it has been reported that defocused Li-SWT leads to improvement of bladder innervation and vascularization.
Based on the previously mentioned studies, the investigators hypothesized that Li-SWT can offer benefit in improvement of persistent storage symptoms after surgical relief of BPO. In the present study, the investigators will evaluate the effect of Li-SWT on persistent storage symptoms after transurethral surgery for BPO compared to antimuscarinics in a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The patient will be asked to lie in flat dorsal position. A commercially used gel for sonography will be applied to the suprapubic region. The applicator will be placed on suprapubic region with two fingers apart from the symphysis pubis tilting to 45°. Shock waves will be directed to 3 different sites; the midline (over the bladder dome) and 3 cm right and left to the midline (over bilateral bladder walls). The patient will receive 3000 shocks (1000 shocks per site) with energy flux density of 0.12 mJ/mm² and frequency of 4 Hz.
The patient will be asked to lie in lithotomy position. A commercially used gel for sonography will be applied to the perineum. The applicator will be placed on perineal region. Shock waves will be directed to 3 different sites: the midline and 2 cm above and below the midline. The patient will receive 3000 shocks (1000 shocks per site) with energy flux density of 0.12 mJ/mm² and frequency of 4 Hz.
The patient will receive 3000 shocks; 1500 shocks through suprapubic approach (500 shocks per site) and another 1500 shocks through perineal approach (500 shocks per site) with energy flux density of 0.12 mJ/mm² and frequency of 4 Hz.
The same technique of Li-SWT will be used but the applicator of the shock wave device will be turned off.
The patients will be treated by antimuscarinics (solifenacin) which are considered as the conventional treatment of storage symptoms after prostatectomy.
Time frame: approximately 20 months
The primary endpoint is the percent change from baseline in the total score of OABSS (total score = 15) at 3-month follow up.
Time frame: approximately 20 months
The percent of responders at 3-month follow up. Three points reduction in the total score of OABSS is determined as the minimal threshold for a meaningful change. Responders are defined as patients who achieved reduction in the total score of OABSS ≥ 3 at 3-month follow up, and those patients will continue on the same treatment modality.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
The numerical change from baseline in the total score and sub-scores of OABSS at 3 and 6-month follow up will be reported.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
Change in daytime frequency (times/24hrs), urgency (times/24hrs), urge incontinence (times/24hrs), nocturia (times/24hrs) and average voided volume/micturition (ml) from baseline will be compared at 3 and 6-month follow up.
Time frame: approximately 18 months
Incidence of adverse events associated with Li-SWT or solifenacin (n%) should be reported.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
Change in IPSS at 0, 3 and 6 months will be compared.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
Change in PVR (ml) at 0, 3 and 6 months will be compared.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
Change in Qmax (ml/s) at 0, 3 and 6 months will be compared.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
Change in IIEF-15) at 0, 3 and 6 months will be compared.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
Change in bladder volume (ml) at first sensation of filling and maximum cystometric capacity (ml) at 0 and 6 months will be analysed.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
Change in detrusor stability and maximum amplitude (cmH2O) of detrusor overactivity during cystometry at 0 and 6 months will be analysed.
Time frame: approximately 2 years.
Change in maximum detrusor pressure (cmH2O) and BCI during voiding at 0 and 6 months will be analysed.
Mansoura University
Other
Efficacy of Low-intensity Shock Wave Therapy on Persistent Storage Symptoms After Transurethral Surgery for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06198439
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05308979
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Orange, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04547920
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05719285
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details