Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04763798

Efficacy of Hamstring Stretching According to the Neural or Muscle Tissue Involvement

Background: Muscle stretching is a technique widely used in the clinical practice of physiotherapy and in the field of sports. In the bibliography we find a multitude of stretches and procedures described, some of them being similar to neurodynamic tests, which could direct their effect to a neural and not a musculoskeletal structure. The structural differentiation manoeuvre has been shown to be able to discriminate the increase in tension on the nerve.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term efficacy on ischiosural muscle elongation of three modalities of ischiosural stretching according to neural or muscular involvement, in subjects without previous pathology.

Design: Cross sectional study. Methods: A randomised, blinded, assessor-blinded clinical trial was performed. According to the sample size calculation, a total of 35 subjects will be recruited from the International University of Catalonia. Each subject will undergo three hamstring stretching techniques on their dominant leg, Straight-leg-raise (SLR), Passive knee extension (PKE) and Maximun hip flexion (MHF) with an interval of one week on the dominant leg. Muscle elongation in each stretching modality will be assessed with the modified black saver sit and reach test and whether the technique generates a neural or musculoskeletal response when performing the structural differentiation manoeuvre.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, 08195, Spain

About this study

Background: Muscle stretching is a technique widely used in the clinical practice of physiotherapy and in the field of sports. In the bibliography we find a multitude of stretches and procedures described, some of them being similar to neurodynamic tests, which could direct their effect to a neural and not a musculoskeletal structure. The structural differentiation manoeuvre has been shown to be able to discriminate the increase in tension on the nerve.

Objective: To evaluate the short-term efficacy on ischiosural muscle elongation of three modalities of ischiosural stretching according to neural or muscular involvement, in subjects without previous pathology.

Design: Cross sectional study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy subjects over 18 years old who signed the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • The exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) injury in the thigh 6 months previously, 2) diagnosis of any orthopaedic problem or surgery in the lower limbs, 3) back pain or previous surgery in the spine or 4) systemic or neurological disorders.

Treatment and study plan

Straight-leg-raise (SLR)

Other

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the SLR, the knee was kept in full extension and then, hip flexion was performed until a marked resistance. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.The stretch lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Passive Knee extension test (PKE)

Other

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For the PKE, the hip was kept in 90º flexion and then, knee extension was performed. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Maximum hip flexion (MHF)

Other

The stretched lower limb was on a mobile support and the contralateral limb was stabilized with a belt on the bench. For MHF, a maximal hip flexion was performed and then, knee extension was applied. All stretching modalities were applied until a marked resistance was felt by the physical therapist (end-feel) or until the point of maximal tolerance referred by subjects.

The stretches lasted 30 seconds followed by 15 seconds rest period and the procedure was repeated 5 times. Each stretching was applied for 5 minutes

Primary outcomes

  1. Modified back-saver sit-and-reach test

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.

    subjects will perform a single-leg sit-and-reach on a bench. The untested leg will be placed on the floor with knee at approximately 90º. A measuring tape will be placed on the bench. Subjects aligned the sole of the foot of the tested leg with the 50-cm mark on the measuring tape. Thereafter, subjects will be asked to reach forward as far as possible while maintaining the knees, arms, and fingers fully extended, and keep in the two hands on tip of each other and palms down

  2. Distal sensation

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.

    Passive ankle dorsiflexion was performed as distal sensation manoeuvre at the final position of all stretching modalities. Subjects were asked to indicate if the sensation during the stretching was modified during the ankle dorsiflexion (neural response) or was the same (musculoskeletal response)

  3. Force intensity applyed

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.

    The intensity of the force applied during each stretching modality was measured by a manual dynamometer (MicroFET2, Hoggan Scientific, Salt Lake City, Utah). The dynamometer was applied on the distal leg, proximal to the ankle joint. The physiotherapist performed the stretching until a marked resistance was felt and then, the force was registered.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived sensation

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 3 weeks.

    After the stretching application, all subjects were asked about their perceived sensation. They were asked about the intensity of the tension sensation during the technique. A numeric scale, ranging from 0 ("no tension") to 10 ("worst tension imaginable") was used to indicate the intensity of tension sensation during the stretching technique.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Feb 21, 2021
Registry last updated
Sep 6, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.