Alberto Augusto Martins Paiva
Brasília, Federal District, 71938360, Brazil
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT06266845
Introduction: Health education provided through the escape-room is still a recent approach in educational methodology and tends to be a strategy that benefits nursing students, particularly in gaining knowledge and skills. However, few studies have explored the use of both in-person and virtual escape-room as an educational methodology in nursing. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of the gamification strategy through the in-person escape-room model compared to the virtual model in enhancing cognitive and affective competencies for recognizing cardiac arrhythmias in critical care patients within the nursing field. Method: A randomized clinical trial to be conducted with nursing students from higher education institutions in the Federal District, Brazil. Students will undergo a theoretical class on cardiac arrhythmias in critical patients and will then be randomized to experience either the in-person or virtual escape-room scenario. Knowledge tests, the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale, Satisfaction and Self-confidence Scale in nursing management learning, and perceived gains will be administered pre and post-intervention. Results with p≤0.05 will be considered significant. Expected Results: It is anticipated that this study will contribute to the enhancement and broadening of cognitive and affective competencies in nursing students, improving the quality of care through an active educational strategy like the escape-room, and consequently reducing costs for the Unified Health System by minimizing errors in recognizing clinical changes in critical patients. Additionally, the study aims to address gaps in understanding the use of educational escape-rooms in the field of nursing.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Brasília, Federal District, 71938360, Brazil
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The in-person escape room will be conducted in the nursing laboratory of a Higher Education Institution (HEI), equipped with a high-fidelity mannequin to simulate a critical patient and create a realistic environment. Participants will be divided into groups, with one group entering at a time as requested. During the in-person escape room, participants will interact with the patient mannequin, hospital equipment and devices, as well as with objects and clues in the environment. The game duration will be 30 minutes to ensure equal conditions among participants and prevent time distortions. Interactions and participants' performance will be recorded by the facilitator, guiding the feedback.
The virtual escape room will be conducted in a classroom of an HEI, utilizing an online platform that allows the virtual reproduction of the game. Each group will have access to a tablet or computer to participate in the game provided by the researcher. During the game, participants will interact with the platform interface and solve challenges to escape the virtual room within 30 minutes. Thus, each group will have a maximum of 30 minutes to complete the escape room, ensuring equal conditions among participants. Records of interactions and participant performance will be logged for later analysis and feedback.
Time frame: 3 months
The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) will be necessary to assess the impact of the intervention on the stress experienced by students during the process. The scale consists of 21 items, with seven items in each of the three scales (depression, anxiety, and stress). The minimum and maximum scores for each subscale are determined by the sum of the values assigned to the corresponding items. Generally, for each of the three subscales, the minimum possible score is 0, indicating the absence of symptoms, while the maximum score varies depending on the intensity of the responses provided by participants to specific items. For example, on a scale of 0 to 21 for each subscale, a higher score suggests higher levels of depression, anxiety, or stress.
Time frame: 3 months
Another instrument that will be used in the study is the Perceived Gains Scale, which consists of 25 items with 5 response options: Improved immensely; improved considerably; improved slightly; stayed the same; got worse. In this scale, the different variables identify students' perceptions of the gains achieved through their experience with high-fidelity patient mannequins at the cognitive level.
Time frame: 3 months
The "Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning" Scale was developed to measure individuals' satisfaction and self-confidence acquired through high-fidelity simulations. This instrument has been validated in Brazil and will be used in the present study following the intervention. The scale consists of 26 items, organized into five factors: the usefulness and effectiveness of teaching methods, the provision of didactic materials and activities, the quality of teaching provided by the facilitator, self-confidence in learning, and student responsibility for their own learning. Participants indicate their level of agreement with each item on a five-point scale, ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." The closer to 5, the higher the level of satisfaction with learning and self-confidence.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
University of Brasilia
Other
Efficacy of Gamification With Escape-Room for Arrhythmia Identification in Critical Patients: an Experiment With Nursing Undergraduates
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07388355
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arrythmia
New London, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05034432
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arrythmia
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04848844
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arrythmia
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT05935007
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arrythmia
Sylmar, California, United States
View Trial Details