Erickson hypnosis
BehavioralErickson hypnosis sessions performed by an experienced hypnotherapist, according to a pre-established protocol : 5 sessions (1 per week). Between each session : exercise of auto-hypnosis by the patient himself, at home
NCT Number: NCT04259203
This study evaluates the efficacity of Erickson hypnosis in the treatment of chronic pain in patients with Parkinson's disease. Half of participants will follow a 2-month Erickson hypnosis protocole, while the other half will benefit from the usual care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chu Cote de Nacre, Caen, France
A large proportion of patients with Parkinson's disease suffer of chronic pain directly related to the disease. The management of painful symptoms is difficult and currently, there is no commonly admitted guidelines.
Several studies have shown the efficacy of Erickson hypnosis to reduce the perception of chronic pain in different conditions. This efficacy has never been tested in Parkinson's disease.
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of Erickson hypnosis protocol, compared to usual care, for the management of Parkinson's disease-related chronic pain.
The study team assume that Erickson hypnosis will be more efficient than usual care to reduce perceived chronic pain. They also assume that regular practice of autohypnosis will contribute to long-term efficacy.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Erickson hypnosis sessions performed by an experienced hypnotherapist, according to a pre-established protocol : 5 sessions (1 per week). Between each session : exercise of auto-hypnosis by the patient himself, at home
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Measure of the intensity of pain perception by VAS at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both values will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the Brief Pain Inventory at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the McGill Pain Questionnaire at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the Beck Depression Inventory at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the Fatigue Severity Scale at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the PDQ-8 at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the SCOPA-PS at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the EQ-5D-5L at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Analgesic treatments will be recorded during the week preceding each visit and a mean dosage will be calculated during each period. The difference between both mean values will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Psychotropic medications will be recorded during the week preceding each visit and a mean dosage will be calculated during each period. The difference between both mean values will allow to calculate a variation index.
Time frame: At baseline and 2 months after
Completion of the MDS-UPDRS at the baseline visit and at the post-treatment visit (2 months later). The difference between both scores will allow to calculate a variation index.
University Hospital, Lille
Other
Acronym: DOLHYP-PARK-1
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05011773
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05713500
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Toulouse, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06133283
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05766813
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details