Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07061015

Efficacy of Different Osseodensification Techniques

different possible osseodensification techniques used to improve bone density around dental implants, using either ] osseodensifying drills, reverse drilling of conventional drills, and rotary expanders.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Osseodensification

Age range

45 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Delta university for science and technology

Al Mansurah, Daqhlia, 35515, Egypt

About this study

the study include 3 groups with different implant drilling protocols; group 1 where osseodensifying burs are used, group 2 where conventional drills with reverse motion are used, group 3 where rotary expanders are used

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • · Adult osteoporotic female patients confirmed by CBCT grey values ranging from 290 to 420 HU, with age range 45-60 years.
  • Patients should be free from any other systemic diseases, according to ASA classifications (American society of Anesthesiologists).
  • Patients of single or multiple missing teeth in the posterior mandible.
  • A ridge width of 4mm and a height of > 8mm above the roof of Inferior Alveolar canal.
  • No buccal concavities were present at the planned implant site

Exclusion criteria

  • · Poor oral hygiene.
  • Heavy smoker (more than 20 cigarettes /day),or alcoholic abusing patients.
  • Radiation therapy to the head and neck region, or chemotherapy in the last 6 months prior to the implant placement.

Treatment and study plan

osseodenification with osseodensifying burs

Procedure

different osseodensification techniques to be studied

reverse drilling

Procedure

using the conventional drills in reverse mode

rotary expanders

Procedure

expanders in clockwise direction

Primary outcomes

  1. peri implant bone density

    Time frame: 12 months

    through ROI (region of interest) to measure Grey scale on Cone beam computed tomography CBCT

  2. implant stability quotient

    Time frame: 12 months

    ISQ (implant stability quotient) using osstell device

  3. alveolar ridge dimension changes

    Time frame: 12 months

    with cone beam computed tomography CBCT in coronal and sagittal cuts, in millimeters mm .

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Delta University for Science and Technology

Other

Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation Of Different Motor Driven Osseodensification Techniques Used For Implant Placement In Posteriorly Atrophied Mandible Of Osteoporotic Patients

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 11, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.