Qilu hosipital
Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
NCT Number: NCT05301725
Aretrospective study was conducted to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPI ) and Potassium-competitive acid blockers ( P-CAB )for clarithromycin-based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in the management of Helicobacter pylori eradication.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Observational
Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
This study retrospectively enrolled participants with H. pylori infection who received bismuth quadruple regimen containing clarithromycin. The basic information, treatment results, adverse reactions and compliance of the patients were collected. According to the type of acid inhibitors, participants were divided into traditional PPI group and P-CAB group. Traditional PPI group which were divided into lansoprazole group and esomeprazole group. The eradication rate, safety, compliance of H. pylori in different treatment regimens was evaluated. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of eradication failure.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All patients received PPI regimen( lansoprazole or esomeprazole,bismuth amoxicillin,clarithromycin for14 days). Demographic data,treatment regimens, outcomes of therapy, adherence to therapy and adverse event were retrieved.
All patients received P-CAB regimen(vonoprazan,bismuth ,amoxicillin,clarithromycin for14 days). Demographic data,treatment regimens, outcomes of therapy, adherence to therapy and adverse event were retrieved.
Time frame: 1 month
Six weeks after completion of treatment, numbers of patients get H.pylori eradicated supported by negative 13C-UBT results will be investigated by an independent researcher. Then eradication rate in each group will be calculated by using intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, modified intention to treat analysis (MITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis. The ITT analysis includes all the patients who take at least one dose of the study medications. The MITT analysis is limited to patients who complete follow-up.The PP analysis is limited to patients who take over 90% of the study medications and complete follow-up.
Time frame: 1 month
At the follow-up, adverse events complained by patients will be recorded by an independent researcher, meanwhile CTCAE v5.0 was used to evaluate severity of adverse events.The prevalence of adverse events was compared between the two group
Time frame: 1 month
Compliance was evaluated by assessing the total pills patients have taken.Compliance was defined as good whenmore than 90% or less than 120% of the total pills were taken
Shandong University
Other
Efficacy of Different Acid Suppressors in Bismuth-containing Quadruple Therapy as First-line Treatment Against Helicobacter Pylori
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.