Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03537300

Efficacy of Deep Cervical Flexor Muscles Training on Neck Pain, Functional Disability and Muscle Endurance in School Teachers

Neck pain (NP) is a common work related disorder. Teaching is one profession in which its prevalence is high. The Daily job of a school teacher involves head down posture while reading, writing, etc., exposing them to risk of developing NP. Deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles have been shown to have lower endurance in patients with cervical impairment which has been associated with disability. There is limited evidence that reports efficacy of DCF muscles training in occupational NP. This study was done to see the effect of DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback on pain, muscle endurance and functional disability in school teachers with NP.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

25 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Neck pain (NP) is a common work related disorder. Teaching is one profession in which its prevalence is high. The Daily job of a school teacher involves head down posture while reading, writing, etc., exposing them to risk of developing NP. Deep cervical flexor (DCF) muscles have been shown to have lower endurance in patients with cervical impairment which has been associated with disability. There is limited evidence that reports efficacy of DCF muscles training in occupational NP. This study was done to see the effect of DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback on pain, muscle endurance and functional disability in school teachers with NP. 65 teachers, aged between 25 to 45 years with experience of more than 5 years were agreed to participate in this study. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups, experimental (EG) and control group (CG). In EG, subjects received DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises for neck pain while in CG subjects received only conventional exercises. Pain, muscle endurance and disability measured at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment. Endurance of DCF muscles was measured by CCF test using pressure biofeedback instrument, Pain intensity was measured using NPRS and Functional disability was assessed using NDI questionnaire.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • experience of more than 5 years
  • neck pain score of more than 5 on numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), mild to moderate disability score on neck disability index (NDI) and poor cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) test

Exclusion criteria

  • any neurological sign or symptom, history of spinal surgery or if they were taking any treatment for their pain.

Treatment and study plan

DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises

Behavioral

DCF muscles training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional exercises

Conventional exercises

Behavioral

conventional exercises

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline

    Time frame: at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment

    Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS): NPRS. Subjects had to rate their pain on the 0-10 rating scale, where 0 means no pain while 10 is the worst possible pain.

  2. Change in muscle endurance at day 42, day 14 after intervention from baseline

    Time frame: at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment

    Craniocervical flexion test (CCF) test using pressure biofeedback instrument

Secondary outcomes

  1. disability

    Time frame: at day 0 (before treatment), day 14 and day 42 after treatment

    Functional disability was assessed using Neck disability index (NDI) questionnaire. Subjects had to answer the multiple choice questions and their score was interpreted on range from 0 to 50, 0 being no disability and 50 indicating complete disability.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

King Saud University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
May 25, 2018
Registry last updated
May 25, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.