Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07667270

Efficacy of Complex Decongestive Therapy, Exercise and Diet in Women With Lipedema

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard physical therapy methods (Complex Decongestive Therapy, Pneumatic Compression, and Exercise) combined with two different nutritional approaches (personalized anti-inflammatory diet vs. standard healthy nutrition education) in women diagnosed with lower extremity lipedema.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

This single-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will include 75 female participants aged 18-65 with Stage I, II, or III lipedema. Participants will receive either a personalized anti-inflammatory diet or standard nutrition education, alongside a standard 12-week physical therapy protocol. Evaluations will be conducted at baseline, 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks to measure changes in lower extremity circumference/volume, body composition, ultrasonographic tissue characteristics, functional capacity (6MWT), pain severity (VAS), and quality of life.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female, aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Clinical and physical examination confirming Stage I, II, or III lipedema.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) < 45 kg/m^2.
  • Ability to walk without restriction.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of active malignancy.
  • Decompensated heart failure.
  • Significant lower extremity peripheral artery disease.
  • Acute deep vein thrombosis or active thromboembolism.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Significant sensory loss or severe neuropathy in the lower extremities.
  • History of lower extremity liposuction within the last 12 months.
  • Active severe infection (e.g., cellulitis).
  • Other severe systemic diseases deemed unsafe for the study by researchers.
  • Severe non-compliance with the study protocol (e.g., missing >30% of planned sessions) or participant requesting withdrawal.

Treatment and study plan

Anti-inflammatory Diet and Physical Therapy

Other

A personalized anti-inflammatory diet plan formulated by the clinic, combined with a 12-week standard physical therapy protocol. The physical therapy includes compression garments (CCL2), Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD), Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC), and an exercise program.

Standard Diet and Physical Therapy

Other

Standard healthy nutrition education, combined with a 12-week standard physical therapy protocol. The physical therapy includes compression garments (CCL2), Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD), Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC), and an exercise program.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lower Extremity Circumference

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Lower extremity circumferences will be measured in centimeters (cm) using a standardized tape measure at predefined anatomical landmarks, including the foot dorsum, ankle, and at 10-cm intervals proximally below the knee, as well as at the thigh. Change in lower extremity circumference from baseline will be evaluated within and between study groups.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Weight

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Body weight (kg) measured at each assessment visit using standardized equipment. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  2. Change in Subcutaneous tissue thickness (mm)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Subcutaneous tissue thickness (mm) will be assessed via ultrasound at standardized anatomical landmarks (anterior thigh, inferomedial knee, lateral leg, pre-tibial, medial malleolus, and umbilical region). Both parameters are measured directly in millimeters (mm). Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  3. Change in Dermis thickness (mm)

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Dermis thickness (mm) will be assessed via ultrasound at standardized anatomical landmarks (anterior thigh, inferomedial knee, lateral leg, pre-tibial, medial malleolus, and umbilical region). Both parameters are measured directly in millimeters (mm). Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  4. Change in Fibrous Septa Prominence

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    The prominence of fibrous septa within the subcutaneous tissue will be assessed by ultrasound at predefined lower-extremity anatomical landmarks using a visual scoring system ranging from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater fibrotic septal prominence. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  5. Change in Subcutaneous Fat Tissue Echogenicity

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Subcutaneous fat tissue echogenicity will be assessed by ultrasound at predefined lower-extremity anatomical landmarks using a visual scoring system ranging from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater echogenicity. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  6. Change in Rectus Femoris Muscle Thickness

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Rectus femoris muscle thickness will be measured by ultrasound in millimeters (mm) at a standardized anatomical site. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  7. Change in Rectus Femoris Muscle Echogenicity

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Rectus femoris muscle echogenicity will be assessed by ultrasound at a standardized anatomical site using a visual grading scale from Grade 1 to Grade 3. Higher grades indicate greater muscle echogenicity. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  8. Change in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Thickness

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness will be measured by ultrasound in millimeters (mm) at locations 5 cm above and 5 cm below the umbilicus. The mean of these two measurements will be used for analysis. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  9. Change in Functional Capacity

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Assessment of submaximal exercise capacity using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The total distance walked in 6 minutes will be recorded in meters (m). A higher score indicates better functional capacity.

  10. Change in Pain Severity

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    Evaluation of leg pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Scale range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain); lower scores indicate better outcome. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

  11. Change in Patient Benefit Index-Lymphedema (PBI-L) Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    The Patient Benefit Index-Lymphedema (PBI-L) is a patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the perceived benefit of treatment in individuals with lymphedema. It includes 23 items addressing treatment goals and the extent to which these goals have been achieved. Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater patient-perceived treatment benefit. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be evaluated.

  12. Change in LYMQOL-Leg Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    The LYMQOL-Leg is an 18-item, lymphedema-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with lower-limb lymphedema. It assesses the impact of lymphedema across relevant quality-of-life domains. Domain scores range from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating a better outcome and less lymphedema-related impairment. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be assessed.

  13. Change in SF-12 Physical Component Summary Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) score assesses physical health status, including physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, and general health perceptions. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health status. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be analyzed.

  14. Change in SF-12 Mental Component Summary Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    The SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score assesses mental health status, including psychological well-being, emotional role functioning, social functioning, and vitality. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health status. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be evaluated.

  15. Change in Beck Depression Inventory Score

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

    The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 63, with lower scores indicating fewer depressive symptoms. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be assessed, with a decrease in score indicating improvement.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ender Salbas, Assist. Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 555 669 8639

Nilay Sahin, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+90 555 233 2535

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Balikesir University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of Complex Decongestive Therapy, Exercise, and Nutritional Interventions in Women Diagnosed With Lipedema: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.