Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06157333

Efficacy of Accelerated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Patients With Post-stroke Depression

The FDA approved repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in 2008. The conventional rTMS protocol that has been used effectively for major depression is 5 days per week for 4-6 weeks. The accelerated rTMS protocol involves conducting more than one session per day. In the treatment of post-stroke depression (PSD); although the effectiveness of conventional rTMS procedure has been shown in many studies, there is limited data on accelerated rTMS protocol in which the number of daily sessions is increased. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of accelerated rTMS treatment on depression symptoms in patients diagnosed with PSD and whose depressive symptoms persist despite medical treatment, by comparing it with sham stimulation.

Question 1: Is accelerated rTMS an effective and reliable method in the treatment of post-stroke depression? Question 2: Is accelerated rTMS effective on quality of life, functional assessment and motor recovery in patients with post-stroke depression?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

Ankara, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Objective: Depression is a complication that negatively affects the quality of life and functional recovery of stroke patients and is associated with increased physical disability, cognitive and social impairment. In addition to being resistant to pharmacotherapy, the side-effect profile of the drugs used in the treatment and the increase in stroke recurrence, increase the need for new alternatives in the treatment of post-stroke depression (PSD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is one of the treatment of interest in this field. In the treatment of PSD; although the effectiveness of conventional rTMS procedure has been shown in many studies, there is limited data on accelerated rTMS protocol in which the number of daily sessions is increased. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of accelerated rTMS treatment on depression symptoms in patients diagnosed with PSD and whose depressive symptoms persist despite medical treatment, by comparing it with sham stimulation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ischemic stroke in only one hemisphere is diagnosed by MRI,
  • Ischemic stroke within 1-6 months,
  • Diagnosis of major depression according to DSM-5 diagnostic criteria by a psychiatrist during post-stroke evaluations,
  • Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) score of ≥8 as assessed by a clinical psychologist, despite receiving at least one antidepressant treatment,
  • Drug use should be stable for at least 2 weeks before accelerated rTMS treatment for depression treatment and no change in drug dose should be made for 6 weeks following treatment,
  • Mini mental test score ≥ 24

Exclusion criteria

  • Known history of epilepsy, dementia, cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative disease,
  • İntracranial metallic implant (cochlear implant, brain pacemaker, drug pump, etc.),
  • Lesions in the brain due to vascular, traumatic, tumoral or infectious reasons,
  • Recurrent strokes,
  • Aphasia,
  • Alcoholism,
  • Pregnancy,
  • Cardiac pacemaker,
  • Patients diagnosed with psychiatric diseases other than depression

Treatment and study plan

The Magstim Rapid2 Plus Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK)

Device

The Magstim Rapid2 Plus Magnetic Stimulator (Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK) device available in our center was used.

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD)

    Time frame: The depression severity of the patients was recorded by the clinical psychologist before the treatment, at the end of the treatment and 4 weeks after the end of the treatment.

    The HAMD is the most widely used clinician-administered depression assessment scale. The original version contains 17 items pertaining to symptoms of depression experienced over the past week. By adding up the ratings, 0-53 points are obtained. 0-7 points indicate no depression, 8-15 points indicate mild depression, 16-28 indicates moderate depression, and 29 and above indicates severe depression. The version consisting of 17 items was used in our study, and the patients' response to treatment was evaluated based on these scale scores. At the end of the 2-week rTMS application period; A HAMD score of '7' or below is considered 'Remission', a 50% or more decrease in the HAMD score is considered 'There is a response to treatment', and a decrease of less than 50% in the HAMD score is considered 'No response to treatment'.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS)

    Time frame: Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 was evaluated by the experimenter applying rTMS before the treatment, at the end of treatment and 4 weeks after the end of treatment.

    It is a scale that evaluates the quality of life in hemiplegic patients and consists of 8 subsections (strength, hand function, mobility, communication, activities of daily living, participation, emotion and memory) and 59 questions. The patient is asked to answer each question on a 5-point Likert scale, considering the last week. A score of 1 indicates that the patient could not complete the item, and a score of 5 indicates that the patient completed the item without any difficulty. While evaluating, strength (4-20), thinking-memory (7-35), mood-emotion (9-45), communication (7-35), activities of daily living (10-50), mobility (9-45). Scoring is done separately for 8 subsections: hand function (5-25), participation (8-40). Total score is between 59-295. A low score indicates low quality of life. In addition to 8 subsections, there is a visual analog scale that evaluates the perception of recovery after stroke with a score of 0-100 (0: No recovery, 100: Complete recovery).

  2. Brunnstrom Stages

    Time frame: Brunnstrom Stages was evaluated by the experimenter applying rTMS before treatment, at the end of treatment and 4 weeks after the end of treatment.

    It is a test used to follow motor recovery after stroke. Movement patterns of hemiplegic patients are graded between 1-6.

  3. Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

    Time frame: Functional Independence Measure was evaluated by the experimenter applying rTMS before treatment, at the end of treatment and 4 weeks after the end of treatment.

    The general body functions of the individual are evaluated with 6 sub-main sections under the headings of four motor (self-care, sphincter control, transfer and displacement) and two cognitive activities (communication and social cognition). Each subsection contains articles in its own category. Motor functions are evaluated in 13 items and cognitive functions in 5 items, and the scale consists of a total of 18 items. Each item is scored using a 7-point Likert scale, with the highest score being 7 and the lowest score being 1, depending on the patient's level of independence in relation to the relevant activity. 1-2 points are considered dependent, 3-5 points are considered partially dependent, and 6-7 points are considered independent. By summing the scores of 18 items, a total score between 18-126 is obtained. A score of 18 points indicates that the individual is completely dependent, while a score of 126 indicates complete independence.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Effect of Accelerated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Depression Symptoms in Patients With Subacute Ischemic Stroke

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Dec 5, 2023
Registry last updated
Dec 5, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.