Ora, Inc.
Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States
NCT Number: NCT01332188
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of different concentrations of AC-170 compared to vehicle in the prevention of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis in the conjunctival allergen challenge (CAC) Model.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me10 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Andover, Massachusetts, 01810, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1 drop in each eye at 3 separate times during a 21 day period
1 drop in each eye at 3 separate times during a 21 day period
1 drop in each eye at 3 separate times during a 21 day period
1 drop in each eye at 3 separate times during a 21 day period
Time frame: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 3, 5, 7 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Ocular itching was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ocular itching score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Conjunctival Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Conjunctival Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Conjunctival Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of conjunctival redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Ciliary Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ciliary redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Ciliary Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ciliary redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Ciliary Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of ciliary redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Episcleral Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of episcleral redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Episcleral Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of episcleral redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Episcleral Redness was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of episcleral redness score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Chemosis was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of chemosis score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Chemosis was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of chemosis score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Chemosis was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of chemosis score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Eyelid swelling was assessed by the patient on a 0-3 scale (0=none to 3=severe). Average of eyelid swelling score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Eyelid swelling was assessed by the patient on a 0-3 scale (0=none to 3=severe). Average of eyelid swelling score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Eyelid swelling was assessed by the patient on a 0-3 scale (0=none to 3=severe). Average of eyelid swelling score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Tearing was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of tearing score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Tearing was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of tearing score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Tearing was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Average of tearing score over both eyes was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Rhinorrhea was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Rhinorrhea score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Rhinorrhea was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Rhinorrhea score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Rhinorrhea was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Rhinorrhea score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Nasal Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Nasal Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Nasal Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Nasal Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Nasal Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Nasal Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Ear or Palate Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a single 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Ear or Palate Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Ear or Palate Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a single 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Ear or Palate Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Ear or Palate Pruritus was assessed by the patient on a single 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Ear or Palate Pruritus score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 16 hours after drop instillation. Nasal Congestion was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Nasal Congestion score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 24 hours after drop instillation. Nasal Congestion was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Nasal Congestion score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A treatment efficacy CAC was performed 15 minutes after drop instillation. Nasal Congestion was assessed by the patient on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe). Nasal Congestion score for each time point was analyzed.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A nasal composite score was summed for each patient based on the presence of at least one of the following four nasal symptoms on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe): rhinorrhea; nasal pruritus; ear or palate pruritus; and nasal congestion. The percentage of subjects with at least one nasal symptom present was calculated for each time point.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A nasal composite score was summed for each patient based on the presence of at least one of the following four nasal symptoms on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe): rhinorrhea; nasal pruritus; ear or palate pruritus; and nasal congestion. The percentage of subjects with at least one nasal symptom present was calculated for each time point.
Time frame: 7, 15, 20 minutes post-CAC
A nasal composite score was summed for each patient based on the presence of at least one of the following four nasal symptoms on a 0-4 scale (0=none to 4=severe): rhinorrhea; nasal pruritus; ear or palate pruritus; and nasal congestion. The percentage of subjects with at least one nasal symptom present was calculated for each time point.
Time frame: upon instillation, 1 minute and 2 minutes post instillation
Subjects were asked to rate the comfort of the drop in each eye upon instillation, at 1 minute, and at 2 minutes after instillation of study medication. The assessment used a 10-point scale with 0 as very comfortable and 10 as very uncomfortable. Higher scores represent a worse outcome..
Aciex Therapeutics, Inc.
Industry
A Single Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Three Different Concentrations of Cetirizine (0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.24%) Ophthalmic Solution Versus Vehicle in the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis in the Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (CAC)
Acronym: AC-170
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05234554
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Conjunctival Diseases
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT06602726
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Conjunctival Diseases
Andover, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06602739
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Conjunctival Diseases
Andover, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01471184
Allergic Conjunctivitis, Allergic Rhinitis
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details