Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine
BiologicalSingle dose of a 30 µg/strain of Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine
NCT Number: NCT03739112
This Phase 3 study was intended to assess the relative efficacy of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine during the 2018-2019 influenza season compared to a licensed vaccine in elderly adults 65 years of age and older. One dose of VLP Influenza Vaccine (30 μg/strain) or of Comparator (15 μg/strain) was to be administered to 12,738 participants.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
(Site 106) Colchester Research Group, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
This randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled multicenter, Phase 3 study was conducted at multiple sites. The composition of the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine used in this study included a mix of recombinant H1, H3, and two B hemagglutinin proteins expressed as VLPs for the 2018-2019 influenza virus strains.
A total of 12,794 healthy male and female participants aged 65 years and older were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into one of two parallel treatment groups, such that 6,396 participants were randomized to receive the Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine at a dose of 30 μg/strain and 6,398 participants were randomized to receive the comparator. Within the two treatment groups, participants were stratified by site and two age groups (65-74 years of age and 75 years of age and older in a 2:1 ratio).
Participants participated in this study for approximately nine months, during which a first visit was scheduled on Day 0 for screening and vaccine administration.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Note: Participants with a pre-existing chronic disease are allowed to participate if the disease is stable and, according to the Investigator's judgment, the condition is unlikely to confound the results of the study or pose additional risk to the participant by participating in the study. Stable disease is generally defined as no new onset or exacerbation of pre-existing chronic disease three months prior to vaccination. Based on the Investigator's judgment, a participant with more recent stabilization of a disease could also be eligible.
Exclusion criteria
Single dose of a 30 µg/strain of Quadrivalent VLP Vaccine
Single dose of a 15 μg/strain of Fluarix Quadrivalent® Comparator Vaccine
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Occurrences of laboratory-confirmed ILI caused by any influenza viral strains was measured by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A participant was considered to have protocol-defined ILI if the participant met at least one of the following pre-defined respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing and at least one of the following systemic symptoms: fever (defined as a temperature > 37.2 °C or > 99.0 °F), chills, tiredness, headache or myalgia. The number of laboratory-confirmed ILI cases caused by any influenza strains are reported.
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Occurrences of protocol-defined ILI due to laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by influenza viral types/subtypes that were matched (and/or antigenically similar) to the strains covered in the vaccine formulation was measured by sequential RT-PCR & serotyping. The vaccine-matched strains included: homologous A/Michigan/45/2015 [H1N1], homologous A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016 [H3N2], homologous B/Colorado/06/2017 and homologous B/Phuket/3073/2013) covered in the vaccine formulation. A participant was considered to have protocol-defined ILI if the participant met at least one of the following pre-defined respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing and at least one of the following systemic symptoms: fever (defined as a temperature > 37.2 °C or > 99.0 °F), chills, tiredness, headache or myalgia. The number of laboratory-confirmed ILI cases caused by vaccine-matched influenza strains (all matched strains) are reported.
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Occurrences of protocol-defined respiratory illness due to laboratory-confirmed influenza strain (matched, mismatched, and un-typed) was measured by sequential RT-PCR. A protocol-defined respiratory illness was determined by the occurrence of at least 1 of the following respiratory symptoms: sneezing, stuffy nose, sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing. The number of protocol-defined respiratory illness cases caused by any laboratory-confirmed influenza strain (matched, mismatched, and un-typed) are reported.
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Occurrences of protocol-defined respiratory illness vaccine caused by vaccine-matched influenza strains was measured by sequential RT-PCR & serotyping. The vaccine-matched strains included: homologous A/Michigan/45/2015 [H1N1], homologous A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016 [H3N2], homologous B/Colorado/06/2017 and homologous B/Phuket/3073/2013. The protocol-defined respiratory illness was determined by the occurrence of at least 1 of the following respiratory symptoms: sneezing, stuffy nose, sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing. The number of protocol-defined respiratory illness cases caused by one or more vaccine-matched strains are reported.
Time frame: Day 14 (post-vaccination) up to ~9 months
Occurrences of protocol-defined ILI that were confirmed or not by laboratory testing were assessed. A participant was considered to have protocol-defined ILI if the participant met at least one of the following pre-defined respiratory symptoms: sore throat, cough, sputum production, wheezing, or difficulty breathing and at least one of the following systemic symptoms: fever (defined as a temperature > 37.2 °C or > 99.0 °F), chills, tiredness, headache or myalgia. The number of protocol-defined ILI cases (confirmed or not) are reported.
Time frame: 15 minutes post vaccination
Immediate complaints were defined as any solicited local or systemic reactions. Solicited local reactions included: erythema, swelling, and pain at the injection site) and solicited systemic reactions included: fever, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, joint aches, chills, a feeling of general discomfort, swelling in the axilla, and swelling in the neck.
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Participants were monitored for both solicited local reactions (erythema, swelling, and pain at the injection site) and solicited systemic reactions (fever, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, joint aches, chills, a feeling of general discomfort, swelling in the axilla, and swelling in the neck) from the time of vaccination through Day 7. Any solicited local or systemic immediate complaint was also included.
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Participants were monitored for both solicited local reactions (erythema, swelling, and pain at the injection site) and solicited systemic reactions (fever, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, joint aches, chills, a feeling of general discomfort, swelling in the axilla, and swelling in the neck). The intensity of the solicited reactions was graded as mild (1)-easily tolerated and does not interfere with usual activity; moderate (2)-interferes with daily activity, but the participant is still able to function; severe (3)-incapacitating and the participant is unable to work or complete usual activity or potentially life threatening; (4)-likely to be life-threatening if not treated in a timely manner, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry. ≥ Severe events included severe and potentially life-threatening events. Any ≥severe solicited reactions are reported.
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 7
Participants were monitored for both solicited local reactions (erythema, swelling, & pain at the injection site) & solicited systemic reactions (fever, headache, fatigue, muscle aches, joint aches, chills, a feeling of general discomfort, swelling in axilla, & swelling in neck). The intensity of solicited reactions was graded as mild (1)-easily tolerated and does not interfere with usual activity; moderate (2)-interferes with daily activity, but the participant is still able to function; severe (3)-incapacitating and the participant is unable to work or complete usual activity or potentially life threatening; (4)-likely to be life-threatening if not treated in a timely manner, according to the FDA Guidance for Industry. ≥ Severe events included severe and potentially life-threatening events. Any ≥severe related (possibly related, probably related, and definitely related to the study treatments [as defined by investigator]) solicited events are reported.
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Participants were monitored for unsolicited TEAEs (e.g., nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and pain). An adverse event (AE) or adverse experience was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if it began on or after the date and time of Study Day 0 vaccination.
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Participants were monitored for unsolicited TEAEs (e.g., nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and pain). AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if it began on or after the date and time of Study Day 0 vaccination. The intensity of the solicited reactions was graded as mild (1)-easily tolerated and does not interfere with usual activity; moderate (2)-interferes with daily activity, but the participant is still able to function; severe (3)-incapacitating and the participant is unable to work or complete usual activity or potentially life threatening; (4)-likely to be life-threatening if not treated in a timely manner, according to the FDA Guidance for Industry. ≥ severe events included severe and potentially life-threatening events. Any ≥ severe unsolicited reactions are reported.
Time frame: Day 0 (post-vaccination) to Day 21
Participants were monitored for unsolicited TEAEs (e.g., nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, & pain). AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with treatment. An AE was considered treatment-emergent if it began on or after date & time of Study Day 0 vaccination. Intensity of solicited reactions was graded as mild (1) easily tolerated & not interfere with usual activity; moderate (2) interferes with daily activity, but participant still able to function; severe (3) incapacitating & participant unable to work/complete usual activity/ potentially life threatening; (4) likely to be life-threatening if not treated in a timely manner, according to FDA Guidance for Industry. ≥ severe events included severe & potentially life-threatening events. Any ≥severe related (possibly, probably, & definitely related to study treatments [as defined by investigator]) unsolicited events are reported.
Time frame: Day 0 to ~9 months
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE was an AE that resulted in death, was life threatening, resulted in a persistent or significant disability or incapacity, resulted in or prolonged an existing hospitalization, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, or was another important medical event.
Time frame: Day 0 up to ~9 months
The number of participants who died during the study was assessed.
Time frame: Day 0 up to ~9 months
An AE or adverse experience was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who received study drug, with or without a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can be any favorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to a medicinal product.
Time frame: Day 0 up to ~9 months
All NOCDs that may plausibly have an allergic, autoimmune or inflammatory component were reported. Plausibility should be interpreted broadly however; the only clear exceptions were degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis, age-related physiologic changes and life-style diseases. In this context, most cancers, cardiac conditions and kidney diseases should be reported. NOCDs were collected from vaccination on Day 0 to the end of the surveillance period.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMTs were measured using a HI assay for the homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013, and the heterologous strains: H1N1 = A/Brisbane/59/2007; H3N2 = A/Uruguay/716/2007; B/Malaysia = B/Malaysia/2506/2004; B/Florida = B/Florida/4/2006.
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group with either a ≥ 4-fold increase in reciprocal HI titers between Day 0 and Day 21 or a rise of undetectable HI titer (i.e. < 10) pre-vaccination (Day 0) to an HI titer of ≥ 40 on Day 21 was measured using an HI assay for the homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013, and the heterologous strains: H1N1 = A/Brisbane/59/2007; H3N2 = A/Uruguay/716/2007; B/Malaysia = B/Malaysia/2506/2004; B/Florida = B/Florida/4/2006.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group attaining a reciprocal HI titer of ≥ 40 on Day 21 (the percentage of vaccine recipients with a serum HI titer of at least 1:40 following vaccination) was measured using an HI assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013, and the heterologous strains: H1N1 = A/Brisbane/59/2007; H3N2 = A/Uruguay/716/2007; B/Malaysia = B/Malaysia/2506/2004; B/Florida = B/Florida/4/2006.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMFR, the geometric mean of the ratio of GMTs (Day 21/Day 0), was measured using an HI assay homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013, and the heterologous strains: H1N1 = A/Brisbane/59/2007; H3N2 = A/Uruguay/716/2007; B/Malaysia = B/Malaysia/2506/2004; B/Florida = B/Florida/4/2006.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMTs were measured using an MN assay for homologous strains:H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group with either a ≥ 4-fold increase in reciprocal MN titers between Day 0 and Day 21 or a rise of undetectable MN titer (i.e. 7.1) pre-vaccination (Day 0) to an MN titer of ≥ 28.3 at Day 21 post-vaccination were measured using an MN assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMFR, the geometric mean of the ratio of GMTs (Day 21/Day 0), was measured using an MN assay for H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMA was measured using an SRH assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Time frame: Day 0 (pre-vaccination) to Day 21
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group showing at least 50 % increase in GMA between Days 0 and 21 were measured using an SRH assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
The percentage of participants in a given treatment group attaining an area ≥ 25 mm^2 following vaccination (Day 21) were measured using an SRH assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Day 21
GMFR, the geometric mean of the ratio of GMTs (Day 21/Day 0), was measured using an SRH assay for homologous strains: H1N1 = A/Michigan/45/2015; H3N2 = A/Singapore/INFIMH-16-0019/2016; B/Colorado = B/Colorado/06/2017; B/Phuket = B/Phuket/3073/2013.
Medicago
Industry
A Randomized, Observer-blind, Active Comparator-controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of a Plant-derived Quadrivalent VLP Influenza Vaccine in Adults 65 Years of Age and Older
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05422326
Animal Diseases, Bird Diseases
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03301051
Infections, Influenza
Mobile, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04822818
Corona Virus Infection, Coronaviridae Infections
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01991561
Infections, Influenza, Human
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details