Hôpital Pierre Paul Riquet
Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, 31059, France
NCT Number: NCT03287544
Linguistic training is traditionally the gold standard for rehabilitation of aphasia after stroke and efficacy criteria count early stage, intensity as well as personalized treatment. To date, no clear evidence showed a specific effect of any therapy in the acute phase of aphasia after stroke. This study aims to compare the effect of a combined therapy (linguistic/communication) versus a linguistic therapy on communication performance in patients in the acute phase of aphasia after a first stroke.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, 31059, France
Twenty to 25% of strokes cause aphasia. Speech and language therapy is the well-known standard treatment of aphasia after stroke although it is based on weak scientific evidence. To date, the efficacy criteria of aphasia rehabilitation are early stage, intensity as well as personalized treatment. Usually these patients receive in acute phase a linguistic training focused on the linguistic impairment. This approach is based on the cerebral plasticity postulate. However the superiority of this practice compared to other methods has never been shown. Moreover the benefit of the combination gathering linguistic treatment with communication treatment has to our knowledge never been studied.
In the present study investigators propose to compare the effect of a combined linguistic/communication rehabilitation versus a linguistic treatment. To do so, investigators will recruit patients with aphasia after a first stroke, in the acute phase. After a allocation to the " combined " and " linguistic " groups, all the patients will have a comprehensive language and neuropsychological assessment before and after 3 months of rehabilitation, and finally 6 months after the onset.
The "linguistic" group will have a rehabilitation only focused on linguistic processes whereas the "combined" group will have a linguistic training as well as communication training. The therapy will be personalized and the therapists will exclusively use standardized linguistic and/or communication toolboxes of rehabilitation containing dedicated activities.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Linguistic training as well as communication training.
Rehabilitation only focused on linguistic processes.
Time frame: Month 3
Assessed by the Lillois communication test
Time frame: Month 6
Assessed by the Lillois communication test
Time frame: Month 3; Month 6
Assessed by the "Score at understanding task".
Time frame: Month 3; Month 6
Assessed by the "Score at a specific quality of life scale ".
University Hospital, Toulouse
Other
Effect of a Combined Language Therapy (Linguistic/Communication) on Aphasia After Stroke in Acute Phase: A Prospective, Controlled, Monocentric Pilot Study
Acronym: ORACLE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07036406
Anomia, Aphasia
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05113160
Aphasia, Aphasia, Acquired
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06185023
Aphasia, Aphasia Non Fluent
Berkeley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05687994
Aphasia, Aphasia, Acquired
Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial Details