insulin glargine
Drug100 Units/mL solution for injection in a pre-filled SoloStar pen
Other names: Lantus®
NCT Number: NCT01117350
Primary objective:
To demonstrate the superiority of insulin glargine over liraglutide in terms of percentage of patients reaching a Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7% at the end of the comparative period (24 weeks) in Type 2 diabetic patients failing lifestyle management and oral agents
Secondary objectives of the comparative period (24 weeks):
>To assess the effect of insulin glargine in comparison with liraglutide on:
* HbA1c level * Percentage of patients whose HbA1c has decreased but remains >= 7% at the end of the comparative period * Percentage of patients whose HbA1c has increased at the end of the comparative period * Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) * 7-point Plasma Glucose (PG) profiles * Hypoglycemia occurrence * Body weight * Adverse events
Objectives of the extension period (24 weeks):
>To assess the effect of insulin glargine in patients not adequately controlled with liraglutide on:
* HbA1c level * FPG * 7-point PG profiles * Hypoglycemia occurrence * Body weight * Adverse events
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Investigational Site Number 040-006, Salzburg, Austria
Maximum estimated study duration per patient: either 27 weeks (patients randomized to insulin glargine arm) or 51 weeks (patients randomized to liraglutide arm) broken down as follow:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
(comparative period):
Inclusion criteria
(extension period):
Exclusion criteria
Additional exclusion criteria for the extension period:
100 Units/mL solution for injection in a pre-filled SoloStar pen
Other names: Lantus®
6 mg/mL solution for injection in a 3-mL pre-filled pen (18mg)
Other names: Victoza®
Metformin was a background treatment, mandatory for each patient randomized in the study (at the minimum dose of 1g/day). It was not supplied by the sponsor.
Time frame: week 12, week 24
The value at the end of the comparative period was defined as the last available HbA1c value measured during the comparative period plus 14 days after the last dose of Investigational Product (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward [LOCF] value).
Time frame: baseline (week -2), week 12, week 24
Percentage of patients with:
AND
Time frame: baseline (week -2), week 12, week 24
Percentage of patients with HbA1c value at end of the comparative period (LOCF) higher than HbA1c baseline value
Time frame: baseline (week -2), week 12, week 24
Change in HbA1C from baseline to the last observation carried forward (LOCF) measured during the comparative period = LOCF value - baseline value
Time frame: week 24, week 36, week 48
Change in HbA1C from beginning of the extension period (week 24) to the last observation carried forward (LOCF) measured during the extension period = LOCF value - week 24 value
Time frame: week 36, week 48
Value at the end of the extension period defined as last available HbA1c value measured during the extension period (i.e. last observation carried forward (LOCF) value)
Time frame: baseline (week 0), week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24
SMFPG = mean value of Self-Monitored Fasting Plasma Glucose measurements over 3 consecutive days in the week before each visit
Value at the end of the comparative period defined as last available value during the comparative period (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward [LOCF] value)
Change = LOCF value - baseline value
Time frame: week 24, week 30, week 36, week 48
SMFPG = mean value of Self-Monitored Fasting Plasma Glucose measurements over 3 consecutive days in the week before each visit
Value at the end of the extension period defined as last available value during the extension period (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward [LOCF] value)
Change = LOCF value - week 24 value
Time frame: baseline (week 0), week 12, week 24
Self-monitored 7-point plasma glucose profiles (before and 2 hours after the start of breakfast, lunch and dinner, and at bedtime) recorded on 3 consecutive days in the week before each visit
Value at the end of the comparative period defined as last available value during the comparative period (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward [LOCF] value)
Change = LOCF value - baseline value
Time frame: week 24, week 36, week 48
Self-monitored 7-point plasma glucose profiles (before and 2 hours after the start of breakfast, lunch and dinner, and at bedtime) recorded on 3 consecutive days in the week before each visit
Value at the end of the extension period defined as last available value during the extension period (i.e. last-observation-carried-forward [LOCF] value)
Change = LOCF value - week 24 value
Time frame: baseline (week 0), week 2, week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24
Change = Last weight value measured during the comparative period (LOCF value) - weight value at baseline
Time frame: week 24, week 30, week 36, week 48
Change = Last weight value measured during the extension period (LOCF value) - weight value at beginning of the Extension Period (Week 24)
Time frame: week 1, week 2, week 6, week 12, week 24
Time frame: week 1, week 2, week 6, week 12, week 24
Time frame: week 30, week 36, week 48
Time frame: all across the comparative period (from week 0 to week 24)
Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia.
Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia, requiring the assistance of another person for active administration of carbohydrate, glucagon or other countermeasure because the patient could not treat him/herself due to acute neurological impairment directly resulting from the hypoglycemia (assistance by another person when the patient could have treated him/herself was not considered as requiring assistance)and one of the following criteria:
Time frame: all across the extension period (from week 24 to week 48)
Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia.
Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from hypoglycemia, requiring the assistance of another person for active administration of carbohydrate, glucagon or other countermeasure because the patient could not treat him/herself due to acute neurological impairment directly resulting from the hypoglycemia (assistance by another person when the patient could have treated him/herself was not considered as requiring assistance)and one of the following criteria:
Sanofi
Industry
A 24-week, Multicenter, International, Randomized (1:1), Parallel-group, Open-label, Comparative Study of Insulin Glargine Versus Liraglutide in Insulin-naïve Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Oral Agents and Not Adequately Controlled, Followed by a 24-week Extension Period With Insulin Glargine for Patients Not Adequately Controlled With Liraglutide
Acronym: EAGLE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05259449
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07251504
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00445627
Body Weight, Diabetes Mellitus
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details