Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03274154

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Versus Untreated Group

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

35 year–60 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Aim of the study was to evaluate the anti-age activity of "Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov" a food supplement, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese), taken for 4 consecutive months by female subjects aged 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years), with moderate-severe skin aging/photoaging according to a reference photographic scale.

The study foresaw the evaluation of the study product activity versus a control group, untreated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • female sex,
  • age 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years),
  • body mass index (BMI) 18-27,
  • caucasian healthy subjects with moderate-severe cutaneous aging/photoaging (score > 3 of the reference photographic scale in appendix 8),
  • agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up,
  • accepting to follow the instructions received by the investigator,
  • accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products,
  • agreeing not to apply any topical or take any oral product or nutritional supplementation (vitamins and minerals) other than the investigational products, or use face massages or other means known to improve skin wrinkles or skin qualities during the entire duration of the study,
  • accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study,
  • no participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 3 months
  • accepting to sign the Informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy,
  • lactation,
  • subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study,
  • subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test at T0, T1, T2 and T3,
  • sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit);
  • subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable.

4.4.2. Dependent on a clinical condition 4.4.2.1. Dermatological disease,

  • Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area as lesions, scars, malformations,
  • recurrent facial/labial herpes,
  • clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
  • Endocrine disease,
  • hepatic disorder,
  • renal disorder,
  • cardiac disorder,
  • pulmonary disease,
  • cancer,
  • neurological or psychological disease,
  • inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease,
  • drug allergy.
  • Anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic (application on the face) and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago),
  • assumption of drugs or dietary supplements able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.

Treatment and study plan

Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov

Dietary Supplement

Food supplement consisting og a tablet and a capsule, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese)

Primary outcomes

  1. Crow's feet visual score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales

  2. Nasolabial folds visual score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales

  3. Surface microrelief regularity evaluation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Regularity grade was evaluated according to this score:

    • = very regular
    • = regular
    • = irregular
    • = very irregular
  4. Skin resistance to pinching clinical score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important

    • = important
    • = moderate
    • = weak
    • = very weak
  5. Skin resistance to traction clinical score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important

    • = important
    • = moderate
    • = weak
    • = very weak
  6. Skin recovery after pinching clinical score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important

    • = important
    • = moderate
    • = weak
    • = very weak
  7. Skin dryness clinical score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Clinical evaluation of skin dryness was performed according to the following score:

    0 = very hydrated skin

    • = hydrated skin
    • = normal skin
    • = kindly dry skin
    • = dry skin
    • = very dry skin
  8. Vascular homogeneity clinical score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score:

    0 = very homogeneous

    • = homogeneous
    • = quite not homogeneous
    • = not homogeneous
    • = very not homogeneous
    • = marked not homogeneous
  9. Pigmentary homogeneity clinical score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score:

    0 = very homogeneous

    • = homogeneous
    • = quite not homogeneous
    • = not homogeneous
    • = very not homogeneous
    • = marked not homogeneous
  10. Skin radiance clinical score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Skin radiance was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good

  11. Skin plumpness clinical score variation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Skin plumpness was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good

Secondary outcomes

  1. Superficial skin hydration

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany).

    The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.

  2. Deep skin hydration

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)

  3. Determination of roughness profilometric parameters

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    Nasolabial folds profilometric parameters measured by Primos compact portable device (GFMesstechnik). Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.

  4. Tolerance evaluation

    Time frame: Basal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

    The food supplement tolerance will be evaluated considering: any adverse event related to the study treatment, which occurred during the study; any judgement reported by the volunteers.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Derming SRL

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Versus Untreated Group

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Sep 6, 2017
Registry last updated
Sep 6, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.