Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07665749

Efficacy and Tolerability of Treatment With Alfalitic Plus Serenoa Repens Compared to Alfalitic Plus Antimuscarinic for Moderate-severe Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

The study aims to investigate, through the International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) questionnaire, the non-inferiority of the therapy with the alpha-blockers+Serenoa repens combination compared to the alpha-blockers+antimuscarinic combination on storage lower urinary tract syndrome (LUTS) in patients with moderate-severe symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in adult men. LUTS/BPH can be very bothersome and impair the quality of life (QoL) of affected men and their partners. Furthermore, LUTS also negatively impact patients' work productivity, being a major cause of absence from work and medical appointments. The prevalence of LUTS/BPH increases with age, making them increasingly common conditions in the Western world.

Standard medical treatments for patients with LUTS/BPH include alpha-blockers (ABs), 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and antimuscarinics. Serenoa repens (HESr) supplements are also recommended as a therapeutic option in international LUTS guidelines. In particular, Serenoa repens has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and muscle relaxant effects that can counteract the effects of BPH. Historically, ABs have been used as first-line therapy for voiding LUTS, while antimuscarinics are effective for irritative LUTS. However, most patients often present with mixed LUTS and therefore require combination therapy. Recent studies have shown that the combination of AB + Serenoa was non-inferior to therapy with AB + 5ARI in improving LUTS, producing fewer side effects. In particular, Serenoa was also seen to be effective in improving irritative symptoms. However, no studies have compared therapy with AB + Serenoa to AB + antimuscarinics in patients with mixed LUTS due to BPH.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 40-80 inclusive
  • Male
  • With moderate-to-severe LUTS from BPH according to IPSS score
  • Placed on AB+Serenoa repens or AB+antimuscarinics for 6 months

Exclusion criteria

  • Prostate or bladder cancer
  • History of neurogenic bladder
  • Urinary tract abnormalities (including urethral strictures)

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. DIFFERENCE IN IPSS

    Time frame: AT 6 MONTHS FOLLOW UP

    Difference in International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) at follow-up between the two treatment groups. IPSS min value 0 - max value 35, where:

    • 0-7 refers to mild symtomps;
    • 8-19 refers to moderate symtomps;
    • 20-35 refers to severe symtomps. Non-inferiority will be defined as a difference of up to 1 point in the International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) between the two groups at follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. SIDE EFFECTS

    Time frame: AT 6 MONTHS FOLLOW UP

    Frequency of side effects in the two treatment categories

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

LUCA BOERI, MD, PHD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+390255034501

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Tolerability of Treatment With Alfalitic Plus Serenoa Repens Compared to Alfalitic Plus Antimuscarinic for Moderate-severe Mixed Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Results of a Cross-sectional Clinical Study

Acronym: FINAL

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 24, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.