Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01603056

Efficacy and Safety Trial of Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix in Subjects With House Dust Mite Induced Rhinitis

Primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of specific immunotherapy with Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix compared to placebo in the treatment of House Dust Mite (HDM) induced rhinitis with or without asthma.

Sublingual immunotherapy has been used during several years and has been shown to provide benefits compare to traditional subcutaneous treatment. This study will investigate if improvements in rhinitis symptoms and less use of symptomatic medication can be obtained as a consequence of being treated under specific immunotherapy.

This study aim also to contribute to the documentation of tolerability and safety profile of Pangramin HDM Mix.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

5 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

No.2, Chongwenmennei Street, Dongcheng District

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China

About this study

Extensive clinical experience has been gained due to the widespread use of Pangramin® SLIT and other SLIT products as named patient products, both with respect to the types and the frequencies of the adverse events(AEs) observed. No safety concerns have been found.

The optimal therapeutic dose range regarding SLIT is not fully elucidated. The fate of the allergen after sublingual administration is not known in detail, i.e. to what extent is the allergen absorbed over the mucosa or swallowed and how this is related to volume, excipients etc. The relationship between dose and effect is thus not fully elucidated. The general recommendation is to use a dose inducing a clinical relevant effect in most patients without causing unacceptable adverse events. As Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix has a safety profile that allows a single daily intake by the patient at home, the dosage at this trial will be the same as marketed product.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female ≥ 5 to ≤ 55 years of age.
  • A history HDM induced allergic rhinitis.
  • Use of medication for the control of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms.
  • Positive Skin Prick Test (SPT).
  • Positive specific IgE.

Exclusion criteria

  • PEF ≤ 70% of predicted value.
  • History of significant symptomatic seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis and/or asthma caused by an allergen to which the patient is regularly exposed, and sensitized (e.g. pollens, cat, dog, cockroach…except house dust mites).
  • Severe asthma.
  • Current symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection or other relevant infectious process.
  • Current food allergies with oral allergy syndrome.
  • A clinical history of chronic sinusitis.
  • Current severe atopic dermatitis.
  • Concomitant or previous treatment by immunotherapy.

Treatment and study plan

Pangramin SLIT HDM mix.

Biological

Up-dosing phase (vial 0 to vial 4) + maintenance phase (3 times per week), for 12 months.

Placebo

Biological

Up-dosing phase (vial 0 to vial 4) + maintenance phase (3 times per week), for 12 months.

Primary outcomes

  1. The Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).

    Subjects completed symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis. A total of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:

    0 = No symptoms.

    • = Mild symptoms.
    • = Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms.

    The six symptoms are classified in 2 groups as follows:

    Nose symptoms: Runny nose, Blocked nose, Sneezing, Itchy nose; Eye symptoms: Gritty feeling/red/itchy eyes, Watery eyes. The six symptom scores were summed to obtain the rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 18(worst).

    Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.

  2. The Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).

    Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores.The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication score range from 0 to 32. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.

    Baseline was from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). The end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and End) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days in diary.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).

    Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.

    A total of 4 rhinitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:

    0 = No symptoms.

    • = Mild symptoms.
    • = Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 4 symptoms are as follows: Runny nose, Blocked nose, Sneezing, Itchy nose. The 4 symptom scores were summed to obtain the rhinitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 12(worst).

    Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.

  2. The Change From Baseline in Conjunctivitis Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).

    Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.

    A total of 2 conjunctivitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:

    0 = No symptoms.

    • = Mild symptoms.
    • = Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 2 symptoms as follows: Gritty feeling/red/itchy eyes, Watery eyes. The 2 symptom scores were summed to obtain the conjunctivitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 6(worst).

    Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.

  3. The Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).

    Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.

    A total of 4 Asthma symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:

    0 = No symptoms.

    • = Mild symptoms.
    • = Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 4 symptoms as follows: Cough, Wheeze, Chest tightness/shortness of breath (dyspnoea), Exercise induced symptoms. The 4 symptom scores were summed to obtain the asthma symptoms score with range 0(best) to 12(worst).

    Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.

  4. Percentage of Healthy Days in This Study Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Total study year

    A healthy day is a day without rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and without any intake of rescue medication. Percentage of healthy days is the healthy days of subject in this study divided by the total study days.

  5. The Change From Baseline in Nasal Complain Scores on Visual Analog Scale at 11-12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).

    The average rhinoconjunctivitis VAS score (baseline to first year). The scale answers the question 'How have your nasal complaints been today?' from 0 = no symptoms to 10 = severe symptoms.

    The baseline VAS rhinoconjunctivitis score is the average value of VAS scores in V1 (Screen Visit, Week -8) and V2 (Randomization visit, Week 0), and Evaluation period (Months 11-12) VAS rhinoconjunctivitis score is the average value of VAS scores in V8 (Week 44) and V9 (Week 52).

  6. The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire at 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Visit 1 date(Week -8), Visit 9 date(Week 52).

    The baseline RQLQ value was collected in Visit 1 (Week -8) and the 12 months' RQLQ value was collected in Visit 9 (Week 52).

    The maximum value of RQLQ score is 168 and the minimum one is 0. The score is decreased as the life quality is better.

  7. Global Assessment of Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom After Treatment Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Visit 9 date, Week 52

    Comparing overall rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms at the end of study year Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

  8. The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).

    Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their Rhinitis symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores. The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily Rhinitis medication score range from 0 to 30. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.

    Baseline was set as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.

  9. The Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire at 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.

    Time frame: Visit 1 date(Week -8), Visit 9 date(Week 52).

    The baseline AQLQ value was collected in Visit 1 (Week -8) and the 12 months' RQLQ value was collected in Visit 9 (Week 52). The maximum value of RQLQ score is 217 and the minimum one is 0. The score is elevated as the life quality is better.

  10. The Change From Baseline in Asthma Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated

    Time frame: Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).

    Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their Asthma symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores. The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily asthma medication score range from 0 to 32. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.

    Baseline was set as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

ALK-Abelló A/S

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Multicentre Clinical Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix in Chinese Population With House Dust Mite Induced Rhinitis With or Without Asthma.

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
May 22, 2012
Registry last updated
Apr 29, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.