Simeprevir
Drug100 participants will receive 1 capsule of 150 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
NCT Number: NCT02114151
The purpose of the study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of simeprevir (150 mg qd) in combination with sofosbuvir (400 mg qd) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infected men and women with cirrhosis who are HCV treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
This is a open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), single arm, multicenter study. The study will consist of a screening phase up to 4 weeks, open-label treatment phase of 12 weeks, and post-treatment follow up phase up to 24 weeks after end of treatment. Approximately 100 participants will receive 150 mg simeprevir in combination with 400 mg sofosbuvir once dailyfor 12 weeks. Safety evaluations will include assessment of adverse events, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, and physical examination. The maximum study duration for each participant will be approximately 40 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
100 participants will receive 1 capsule of 150 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks.
100 participants will receive 1 tablet of 400 mg sofosbuvir orally once daily for 12 weeks.
Time frame: Week 24
Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 12 weeks after the actual end of treatment.
Time frame: Week 16
Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 4 weeks after the actual end of treatment.
Time frame: Week 36
Participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (<) 25 international unit per milliliter (IU/mL) (detectable or undetectable) at 24 weeks after the actual end of treatment.
Time frame: Week 2, 4 and End of Treatment (Week 12)
On-treatment virologic response was determined by HCV RNA results satisfying a specified threshold. <LLOQ undetectable was considered as threshold at any time point. The LLOQ value is 25 IU/mL. EOT=End of Treatment.
Time frame: Week 12
On-treatment failure is defined as participants who do not achieve SVR12 and with confirmed detectable HCV RNA at the actual end of study drug treatment.
Time frame: Up to End of Treatment (Week 12)
Viral breakthrough was defined as confirmed greater than (>) 1 log10 increase in HCV RNA from nadir or confirmed HCV RNA >100 IU/mL in participants who had previously achieved HCV RNA < LLOQ (25 IU/mL).
Time frame: During the Follow-up (Week 24)
Viral relapse was defined as participants who did not achieve SVR12 and had HCV RNA < LLOQ (25 IU/mL) undetectable at EOT and had HCV RNA >= LLOQ (25 IU/mL) during the follow-up period.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 12 and Follow-Up Week 12
The HCV-SIQv4 OBSS was a self-administered questionnaire that contained 33 items: 29 questions developed to assess severity or frequency of symptoms associated with HCV or its treatment, 3 questions regarding the impact of symptoms on work/school attendance, and 1 question regarding the impact of symptoms on daily activities. A symptom severity score (the mean of responses to the 29 symptom items); each symptom score was transformed to have a range from 0 to 100 (most severe). Higher HCV SIQv4 scores indicates worse symptom severity, more time missed from work/school, and more impairment in daily activities, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Follow-up Week 12 and 24
The FSS was a self-administered questionnaire with 9 items developed to assess disabling fatigue that has been used extensively in studies of chronic HCV infection. Item responses were measured on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree (1 point) to strongly agree (7 points). The 9 items were averaged to produce a total score; a lower total score indicates less severe fatigue. FSS scores have a range from 1 to 7 where higher scores indicate more severe fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Follow-up Week 12 and 24
The CES-D Scale assessed how often during the past week participants experienced 20 symptoms commonly associated with major depression. The CES-D scores range from 0 (no symptoms) to 60 (all 20 symptoms most or all of the time during the past 5 to 7 days). The CES-D scores between 16 and 23 points indicate mild to moderate depressive illness while CES-D scores >=23 indicate probable major depressive illness.
Time frame: Baseline, Follow-up Week 12 and 24
The EQ-5D questionnaire was a brief, generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) assessment that could also be used to incorporate participant preferences into health economic evaluations. The EQ-5D questionnaire assessed HRQOL in terms of degree of limitation on 5 health dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and as overall health using a "thermometer" visual analog scale with response options ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).
Time frame: Baseline, Day 3, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, Follow-up Week 4, 12 and 24
Sequencing of the HCV nonstructural protein 3/4A (NS3/4A) and nonstructural protein 5B (NS5B) genes was done to identify pre-existing sequence polymorphisms and characterize emerging HCV viral variants in participants not achieving SVR. Sequencing data is available for 16 participants.
Janssen Infectious Diseases BVBA
Industry
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of a 12-Week Regimen of Simeprevir in Combination With Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Naïve or -Experienced Subjects With Chronic Genotype 1 Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Cirrhosis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02201953
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02346721
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Long Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02220998
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Long Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02201901
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details