Mepolizumab
BiologicalHumanised Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks, provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vial. Vial to be reconstituted with sterile water for injection, just prior to use
NCT Number: NCT02281318
This is a multi-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab adjunctive therapy in participants with severe eosinophilic asthma on markers of asthma control. The overall intent of the current study is to more fully explore the impact of mepolizumab on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and other measures of asthma control, including lung function.
Participants who meet the predefined criteria will be randomised to receive either mepolizumab or placebo in addition to standard of care asthma treatment. Approximately 780 participants with severe eosinophilic asthma will be screened to ensure the randomisation of 544 participants (272 participants per treatment group) into the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
GSK Investigational Site, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Humanised Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks, provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vial. Vial to be reconstituted with sterile water for injection, just prior to use
Sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution
Standard of Care (SOC) will differ by participants, however it will include high dose ICS with at least one other controller, e.g. LABA, with or without maintenance OCS
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
SGRQ consisted of 50 questions (scored from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates best and 100 indicates worst health) designed to measure Quality of Life in par. with diseases of airway obstruction, measuring symptoms, impact, and activity. Questions were completed by the par. with a recall over the past 4 weeks. SGRQ Total Score was calculated by summing the pre-assigned weights of answers, dividing by the sum of the maximum weights for items in SGRQ and multiplying by 100 to get a %. Change from BL in SGRQ was calculated as value at Week 24 minus value at BL for each par. and was analyzed using mixed model repeated measures allowing for covariates of BL value, region, BL maintenance oral corticosteroid (OCS) therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable), BL % predicted FEV1 and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by BL and visit by treatment group. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population consisted of all randomized par. who received >= 1 dose of drug.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
FEV1 is the volume of air that can be forced out in one second after taking a deep breath. The change from Baseline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the value at Baseline for each subject and was analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures adjusting for Baseline absolute pre-bronchodilator FEV1, region, Baseline maintenance OCS therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by Baseline and visit by treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline (Visit 2-latest pre-dose assessment) and Week 24
The percentage of participants achieving a 4 point or greater reduction from Baseline in SGRQ (scored from 0-100 with lower scores indicating better outcome) at Week 24 was compared between treatment groups using a logistic regression model with covariates of Baseline value, region, Baseline maintenance OCS therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable) and Baseline % predicted FEV1.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
The ACQ-5 is a five-item questionnaire, designed to be self-completed by the participants. ACQ-5 score is the mean score of 5 questions, each assessed on a 0-6 point scale to give a mean ranging between 0-6 with lower scores indicating better outcome. The five questions inquired about the frequency and/or severity of symptoms over the previous week. The response options for all these questions consisted of a zero (no impairment/limitation) to six (total impairment/limitation) scale. The mean change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the Baseline value for each participant and analyzed using a mixed model repeated measures allowing for covariates of Baseline value, region, Baseline maintenance OCS therapy, exacerbations in the year prior to the study (as an ordinal variable), Baseline % predicted FEV1 and visit, plus interaction terms for visit by Baseline and visit by treatment group.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multi-centre 24-week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab Adjunctive Therapy in Subjects With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Markers of Asthma Control
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05552508
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Walnut Creek, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04159519
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Brest, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04276233
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Ahmedabad, India
View Trial DetailsNCT04456270
Asthma, Asthma Chronic
Groningen, Netherlands
View Trial Details