Fluticasone propionate
DrugDelivered via Optinose Exhalation Delivery System
Other names: OPN-375
NCT Number: NCT01624662
The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg twice daily (bid) of fluticasone propionate, delivered by the Optinose device, with matching placebo in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis and nasal congestion.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Bensch Clinical Research LLC, Stockton, California, United States
This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study designed to assess the efficacy and safety of intranasal administration of 3 doses of fluticasone propionate (100, 200, and 400 μg bid), delivered by the Optinose device, in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis and nasal congestion.
This study consisted of 3 phases. After signing informed consent, subjects who met eligibility criteria at Visit 1 (screening) visit entered the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Delivered via Optinose Exhalation Delivery System
Other names: OPN-375
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase
Subjects reported nasal symptoms using the electronic diary twice daily immediately before dosing.
0: None
During the single-blind run-in phase and during the 16-week, double-blind treatment phase, an electronic diary was provided to each subject. Subjects reported both instantaneous (evaluation of symptom severity immediately preceding the time of scoring) and reflective (evaluation of symptoms severity over the previous 12 hours) scores for nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) measured by nasoendoscopy
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Measured by the 7-day average instantaneous morning diary symptom scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Change from baseline in rhinorrhea symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Change from baseline in facial pain/pressure symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
Change from baseline in hyposmia symptoms, as measured by AM and PM diary symptom scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy.
0: No polyps
Determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities measured by nasoendoscopy)
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Subjects with a Polyp Grade of 0 (None) in at least one nostril
Polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. This outcome measured how many patients with a polyp grad of 0 in at least 1 nostril.
0: No polyps
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
SNOT-22 is a subject-completed questionnaire that consists of 22 questions. The questions on the SNOT-22 efficacy evaluation were used to calculate a total score. 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic (7 questions), Ear/Facial Symptoms (4 questions), Sleep Function (3 questions), and Psychological Issues (6 questions). Each item was rated on the 5-point scale. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst.
0: No problem
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
The MOS Sleep-R is a brief, self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure key aspects of sleep, such as disturbance, adequacy, somnolence, and quantity. The 12-item version with a 4-week recall was used in this study. The score range for the 12-item version is 0 to 100, lower scores indicating better sleep and higher scores indicating worse sleep. The scale yields a Sleep Problem Index and scores on the following 6 subscales: Sleep Disturbance, Snoring, Shortness of Breath or Headache, Sleep Adequacy, Sleep Somnolence, and Sleep Quantity.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase
The RSDI is a subject-completed instrument that evaluates the self-perceived impact of disease specific head and neck disorders. The RSDI has 30 items in 3 domains: Physical (11 items), Functional (9 items), and Emotional (10 items). The RSDI scale ranges from 0-120, 0 being better quality of life and less impact of CRS on daily function and 120 being worse quality of life and more impact of CRS on daily function.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
The SF-36v2 is a multipurpose, scaled, 36-item, subject-completed validated questionnaire that measures 8 domains of health: limitations in physical activities, limitations in social activities, limitations in usual role activities, bodily pain, general mental health, limitations in usual role activities, vitality, and general health perceptions. It yields scale scores for each of the 8 health domains, and 2 summary measures of physical and mental health. Each scale range is from 0-100. A lower score means more disability and a higher score means less disability.
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase, Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
Patient Global Impression of Change; subject responses to the question: "Since starting the study drug, how would you rate the change in your symptoms?" Percentage includes patients who scored either "very much improved," "much improved," or "minimally improved."
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
A subject was considered eligible for surgical intervention if the following conditions were met:
Time frame: Week 16 of the double-blind treatment phase; Week 24 of the open-label extension phase
The PNIF is an assessment of nasal passage obstruction and was measured using an In-Check portable nasal inspiratory flow meter. To measure PNIF, a mask was placed over the nose during inspiration and inspiratory flow was recorded. Each subject inhaled 3 times and each measurement was recorded. The PNIF value used was the greatest of the 3 results at each time point.
Change from baseline in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF)
Optinose US Inc.
Industry
A 16-Week Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of Fluticasone Propionate Twice a Day (Bid) Using a Novel Bi-directional Device in Subjects With Bilateral Nasal Polyposis Followed by an 8-week, Open-label Extension Phase to Assess Safety
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03688555
Bilateral Nasal Polyposis
Ghent, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT01622569
Bilateral Nasal Polyposis
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03747458
Bilateral Nasal Polyposis
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details