Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05459194

Efficacy and Safety Study of Fluticasone/Salmeterol Administered With Elpenhaler

The aim of this study is to establish the therapeutic equivalence between the test (Fluticasone/Salmeterol administered with Elpenhaler®db, Rolenium®) and the reference formulation (Seretide®, administered with Diskus®), both containing 250/50μg of the Fluticasone/Salmeterol combination.

In case of inhaled products, it is not possible to follow the classic scheme, based on similarity of plasma concentration-time behavior of parent drug in assessing bioequivalence.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

A pharmacodynamic study was designed in order to assess the therapeutic equivalence of the new formulation of Fluticasone/Salmeterol with the innovative one. The test and reference Fluticasone/Salmeterol formulations will be compared in terms of their bronchodilator effects in lung function. Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) will be the primary efficacy measure and will be measured in such a way that a similar time-dependent increase in pulmonary function can be demonstrated for both Fluticasone/Salmeterol formulations in patients with asthma. In terms of safety comparison, repeated measurements of adverse events, vital signs, heart rate, blood hematology and biochemistry as well as ECG changes will enable the establishment of the similar safety profile of the test and reference Fluticasone/Salmeterol combinations.

The study will be conducted in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, 3x3 crossover fashion.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age 18-65 years,
  • diagnosis of asthma of 6 months,
  • FEV1 ≥ 50% and ≤ 80% predicted, reversibility of at least 12%,
  • stable asthma for at least 4 weeks,
  • inhaled steroids (ICS) at a stable dose within the previous 30 days,
  • PIF 30 - 90 lt/min and
  • informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • history of other pulmonary disease, asthma exacerbation or respiratory infection within the previous 4 weeks,
  • hospitalization for acute asthmatic symptoms requiring parenteral steroids or oral steroid dose increase within the previous 30 days,
  • heavy smokers,
  • change of asthma medication within the previous 4 weeks, seasonal asthma alone,
  • history of severe heart disease,
  • pregnancy or lactation,
  • use of a β-blocker, of a NSAID or an antiallergic/antihistaminic medication within 2 weeks prior to screening visit.

Treatment and study plan

RP - TA

Device

randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, 3-way crossover, single dose study, comparing the efficacy and safety of the Fluticasone/Salmeterol combination administered with Elpenhaler®db (Rolenium®) versus the innovative one (Seretide Diskus®)

Other names: Rolenium, Seretide

Primary outcomes

  1. FEV1

    Time frame: 8 days

    12-hour average FEV1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events

    Time frame: 8 days

    Number of Adverse Events during the study

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, 3-way Crossover, Single Dose Study, Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone/Salmeterol Administered With Elpenhaler Versus Seretide Diskus in Patients With Asthma

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Jul 14, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 10, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.