Eravacycline
DrugOther names: TP-434
NCT Number: NCT03032510
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Graz, Austria
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared to ertapenem in treating participants with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI).
This is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of cUTI.
Randomization will be stratified based on two criteria: (1) by primary site of infection (pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy vs all other diagnoses) and (2) by the receipt of a single dose of effective non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI within 72 hours prior to randomization. An enrollment cap of approximately 50% is planned for subjects with pyelonephritis with normal urinary tract anatomy. Also, an enrollment cap of approximately 20% is planned for subjects who have received a single dose of non-study antibiotics for the acute cUTI within 72 hours prior to randomization.
In this study subjects will be enrolled and randomized to one of two treatment arms in a 1:1 ratio: (i) eravacycline intravenously (IV) / levofloxacin (PO), or (ii) ertapenem (IV) / levofloxacin (PO).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: TP-434
Other names: Invanz
Other names: Levaquin
Time frame: End of Infusion
This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of Responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate.
Time frame: TOC visit (14-17 days after randomization)
This was the co-primary outcome measure for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The primary objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) of eravacycline to ertapenem in responder outcome, which was derived from both clinical and microbiological responses, in the micro-ITT population. Clinical responses were either cure, failure, or indeterminate/missing; microbiological responses were characterized programmatically as either success, failure, or indeterminate/missing. Clinical cure was defined as complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection; microbiological success was a reduction of the baseline pathogen(s) to <10^4 colony-forming units/milliliter (CFU/mL). An outcome of responder required a clinical response of cure and a microbiological response of success. Any other combination of the clinical and microbiological responses was considered either Non-responder or Indeterminate.
Time frame: TOC visit (14-17 days after randomization)
Clinical cure: A complete resolution or significant improvement of signs or symptoms of the infection such that no rescue/non-study antibacterial medication was required to treat the cUTI that presented at study entry.
Clinical failure: Subjects were classified as clinical failure in the event of
Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Industry
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of IV Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Acronym: IGNITE3
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03357614
Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Bellflower, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02497781
Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07725848
Antibiotic Resistance, Bacteremia
Bologna, Italy
View Trial Details