Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01844856

Efficacy and Safety Study of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in the treatment of adult complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Córdoba, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female participant hospitalized for cIAI
  • At least 18 years of age (and not over 65 years of age for participant in India)
  • Evidence of a systemic inflammatory response
  • Abdominal pain or flank pain (with or without rebound tenderness), or pain caused by cIAI that is referred to another anatomic area
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • If male: must agree to use an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 90 days following the last dose if sexually active with a female of childbearing potential
  • If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of childbearing potential: either will commit to use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant /patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 90 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence

Exclusion criteria

  • Unlikely to survive the 6-8 week study period
  • Renal failure
  • Presence or possible signs of hepatic disease
  • Immunocompromised condition, including known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity (requiring anti-retroviral therapy or with CD4 count <300), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), organ (bone marrow) transplant recipients, and hematological malignancy. Immunosuppressive therapy, including use of high-dose corticosteroids (for example, >40 mg prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than 2 weeks)
  • History of hypersensitivity reactions to tetracyclines, carbapenems, β-lactam antibiotics or to excipients contained in the study drug formulations
  • Participation in any investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to study entry
  • Known or suspected current Central Nervous System disorder that may predispose to seizures or lower seizure threshold
  • Previously received eravacycline in a clinical trial
  • Antibiotic-related exclusions:
  • Receipt of effective antibacterial drug therapy for cIAI for a continuous duration of >24 hours during the 72-hour preceding enrollment (however, participants with documented cIAI [that is, known baseline pathogen] who have received at least 72 hours of antibiotic therapy and are considered treatment failures may be enrolled. Treatment failure is defined as persistent fever and/or clinical symptoms; or the development of a new intra-abdominal abscess after ≥72 hours of antibiotic therapy), or
  • Receipt of ertapenem or any other carbapenem, or tigecycline for the current infection or
  • Need for concomitant systemic antimicrobial agents other than study drug
  • Refusal of mechanical ventilation, dialysis or hemofiltration, cardioversion or any other resuscitative measures and drug/fluid therapy at time of consent
  • Known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease or associated visceral abscess
  • The anticipated need for systemic antibiotics for a duration of more than 14 days
  • Systemic malignancy that required chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiation therapy or antineoplastic therapy within the previous 3 months or that is anticipated to begin prior to the Test-of-Cure (TOC) visit

Treatment and study plan

Eravacycline

Drug

Other names: TP-434

Ertapenem

Drug

Other names: Invanz

Placebo

Drug

Administered IV to maintain the blind.

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms at the Test-of-cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent-to-treat (Micro-ITT) Population

    Time frame: TOC visit: 25-31 days after the first dose of study drug

    Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the TOC Visit

    Time frame: TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose

    Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented.

  2. Clinical Response of Eravacycline and Ertapenem Treatment Arms in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population at the TOC Visit

    Time frame: TOC visit: 25-31 days after first dose

    Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection [cIAI], unplanned surgical procedures or percutaneous drainage procedures, persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (outcome was neither cure nor failure, or assessment was not available). Participants who were failures at the EOT visit (within 24 hours of last dose) were considered failures at the TOC visit. The number of participants with a clinical response classification of cure, failure, or indeterminate is presented.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline Compared With Ertapenem in Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

Acronym: IGNITE1

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
May 1, 2013
Registry last updated
Jan 11, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.