Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07668583

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ZOLEDRONATE VERSUS PLACEBO ON PAIN AT WEEK 12 IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RECURRENT MULTIFOCAL OSTEOMYELITIS

Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a rare auto-inflammatory bone disease that primarily affects children and/or adolescents at a median age of 10 years. Until now, there is no consensus regarding the treatment of CRMO. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered the first line of therapy with remission in approximately 30% of cases. If unsuccessful, several treatments are tried in addition to NSAIDs, including bisphosphonates and anti-TNFs.

The effectiveness of bisphosphonates (including zoledronate) has been reported in clinical cases and/or retrospective series. They are said to be particularly effective in multifocal forms, mandibular and/or vertebral involvement, but no controlled trials have been conducted. Bisphosphonates have even been proposed as first-line therapy in spinal involvement. The only prospective study, is a phase II trial currently underway in Denmark to study the efficacy of zoledronate (NCT02594878) versus placebo in SAPHO (acronym, standing for Synovitis - Acne - Pustulosis - Hyperostosis - Osteitis) patients considered to be a very similar form of CRMO occurring in adults.

In this context, this study proposes evaluate the efficacy of zoledronate compared to placebo in reducing pain at week 12 in children aged ≥4 and <17 years with NSAID-resistant CRMO. Zoledronate will be administered in three escalating doses: 0.025 mg/kg at baseline (W0), 0.05 mg/kg at week 12 (W12), and 0.05 mg/kg at week 24 (W24). In addition to pain reduction, improvements in MRI findings will be observed, biological markers of inflammation, and quality of life in the zoledronate group. Although subjective, pain reduction remains the most widely used criterion in clinical practice to assess therapeutic efficacy. Zoledronate efficacy will therefore be assessed by the change in standardized pain score (0-10 scale) from baseline to week 12 as the primary endpoint, with additional pain assessments at weeks 4, 24, and 36 as secondary endpoints.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

4 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital

Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Val De Marne, 94270, France

Location contact

Perrine DUSSER, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33145213254

About this study

Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) is a rare auto-inflammatory bone disease that primarily affects children and/or adolescents at a median age of 10 years. Until now, there is no consensus regarding the treatment of CRMO. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered the first line of therapy with remission in approximately 30% of cases. If unsuccessful, several treatments are tried in addition to NSAIDs, including bisphosphonates and anti-TNFs.

The effectiveness of bisphosphonates (including zoledronate) has been reported in clinical cases and/or retrospective series. They are said to be particularly effective in multifocal forms, mandibular and/or vertebral involvement, but no controlled trials have been conducted. Bisphosphonates have even been proposed as first-line therapy in spinal involvement. The only prospective study, is a phase II trial currently underway in Denmark to study the efficacy of zoledronate (NCT02594878) versus placebo in SAPHO (acronym, standing for Synovitis - Acne - Pustulosis - Hyperostosis - Osteitis) patients considered to be a very similar form of CRMO occurring in adults.

In this context, this study proposes to evaluate the efficacy of zoledronate compared to placebo in reducing pain at week 12 in children aged ≥4 and <17 years with NSAID-resistant CRMO. Zoledronate will be administered in three escalating doses: 0.025 mg/kg at baseline (W0), 0.05 mg/kg at week 12 (W12), and 0.05 mg/kg at week 24 (W24). In addition to pain reduction, improvements in MRI findings will be observed, biological markers of inflammation, and quality of life in the zoledronate group. Although subjective, pain reduction remains the most widely used criterion in clinical practice to assess therapeutic efficacy. Zoledronate efficacy will therefore be assessed by the change in standardized pain score (0-10 scale) from baseline to week 12 as the primary endpoint, with additional pain assessments at weeks 4, 24, and 36 as secondary endpoints.

Main objective: To evaluate the efficacy of zoledronate, administered at increasing doses (0.025 mg/kg at baseline, 0.05 mg/kg at week 12, and 0.05 mg/kg at week 24; maximum dose 4 mg per infusion), versus placebo on the change in standardized pain score (0-10 scale) from baseline to week 12 in children aged ≥4 and <17 years with NSAID-resistant CRMO.

Secondary objectives:

  • To compare pain evolution between the two groups at weeks 4, 24 and 36 (pain at week 12 being the primary endpoint).
  • To compare the use of NSAIDs, other analgesics and corticosteroids between the two groups during follow-up.
  • To compare clinical signs (pain on palpation, arthritis, spinal deformity, extra-osseous manifestations, growth and puberty) between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits.
  • To compare biological inflammatory markers between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits.
  • To evaluate disease activity using the CNO Clinical Disease Activity Score (CNO CDAS) between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits.
  • To compare radiological disease activity on whole-body MRI between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits using the mRINBO score.
  • To assess treatment response using PedCNO30 and PedCNO50 score between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits.
  • To compare the rate of radiological remission (early remission at week 12; remission at weeks 24 and 36) between the two groups.
  • To compare the rates of clinical and biological remission between the two groups at weeks 12, 24 and 36.
  • To evaluate changes in health-related quality of life between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits.
  • To assess the impact on schooling (children) and work absenteeism (parents) between the two groups.
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerance of zoledronate.
  • To assess the cost-effectiveness of the strategy

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • aged ≥4 and <17 years for whom:
  • Physician-confirmed diagnosis of CRMO according to Jansson's criteria, with compatible MRI findings. Having lesions on MRI within 12 weeks prior to inclusion and clinically active disease defined by at least one of 2 criteria: patient/parent VAS (pain) superior or equal to 30/100 and/or physician VAS superior or equal to 30/100 after failure of at least 4 weeks of NSAIDs at a stable dose
  • Written informed consent signed by the parents (the child may sign the consent if they wish, but their signature is not mandatory)
  • Having had a dental review within 3 months prior to inclusion, with completion of any necessary invasive dental work before the first dose of zoledronate.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of malignancy or current tumour
  • History of seizure
  • Current infectious osteomyelitis
  • Contraindication to the study drug
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance, to other bisphosphonates, or to any excipient (sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid for pH adjustment, water for injection) ;
  • Hypocalcemia ;
  • Severe renal impairment with creatinine clearance < 35 ml/min ;
  • Prior treatment with bisphosphonates and/or biotherapy within 6 months prior to inclusion.
  • History of HIV, HBV, or HCV infection.
  • Congenital or acquired prolonged QT interval (>0.44 seconds) on ECG.
  • Clinically significant vertebral deformities, including vertebral fracture and/or angular kyphosis with risk of spinal cord compression.
  • Suspected or confirmed tuberculosis.
  • History of renal or hepatic insufficiency.
  • Already enrolled in another interventional study.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding participants
  • Not affiliated with the French social security system.
  • Patient or legal guardians with limited understanding of the French language
  • Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D level <30 ng/mL at screening. Participants may be re-screened after correction of vitamin D deficiency.

Treatment and study plan

Zoledronic Acid / Zoledronate 4 MG/100 ML Intravenous Solution

Drug

Baseline : 0.025 mg/kg ; Week 4 : 0.05 mg/kg ; Week 6 : 0.05 mg/kg

NaCL 0.9% Intravenous Solution

Other

Baseline, Week 4 & Week 6

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in pain score from baseline to week 12

    Time frame: week 12

    Change in standardized pain score (0-10 scale) from baseline to week 12, using Visual Analog Scale VAS 0-10/ 0 = no pain ; 10 = worst imaginable pain

Secondary outcomes

  1. Compare pain score (0-10 scale) evolution between groups at Weeks 4, 24 and 36

    Time frame: Week 4, 24 and 36

    Change in standardized pain score (0-10 scale) from baseline to week 4,24 &36, using Visual Analog Scale VAS 0-10/ 0 = no pain ; 10 = worst imaginable pain

  2. Use of NSAIDs, other analgesics and corticosteroids between the two groups during follow-up.

    Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 36

    compare the use of NSAIDs, other analgesics and corticosteroids between the two groups during follow-up.

  3. Clinical signs (Number of participants presenting clinical manifestations of CRMO (pain on palpation, arthritis, spinal deformity, extra-osseous manifestations, growth impairment and pubertal delay) between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits

    Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 36

    Clinical manifestations will be assessed by physical examination at baseline and at weeks 12, 24 and 36. The proportion of participants presenting each manifestation (pain on palpation, arthritis, spinal deformity, dermatological manifestations, inflammatory bowel disease, growth impairment and pubertal delay) will be compared between groups.

  4. Biological inflammatory markers between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits.

    Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 36

    compare biological inflammatory markers between the two groups at baseline and follow-up visits.

  5. CNO Clinical Disease Activity Score (CNO CDAS)

    Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 36

    The Chronic Nonbacterial Osteomyelitis Clinical Disease Activity Score (CNO CDAS) is a composite disease activity score consisting of three components: (1) patient/parent pain assessment (0-10 visual analog scale), (2) patient/parent global assessment of disease activity (0-10 visual analog scale), and (3) physician assessment of the number of clinically active CNO lesions (0-10). Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater disease activity and a worse clinical condition. The CNO CDAS will be assessed at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, and 36.

  6. Whole-body MRI disease activity assessed by the modified Radiological Index for Non-Bacterial Osteitis (mRINBO)

    Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 36

    The mRINBO score will be assessed on whole-body MRI at baseline and follow-up visits. The score incorporates the number of radiologically active lesions, the maximum lesion size (RALmax), extramedullary inflammatory changes, and chronic radiological changes. Higher scores indicate greater radiological disease activity. Whole-body MRI assessments will be performed at baseline and at weeks 12, 24, and 36.

  7. Proportion of participants achieving PedCNO30 response at week 36

    Time frame: week 36

    PedCNO30 is defined as at least 30% improvement in at least three of five core variables, with no more than one variable worsening by >30%.

  8. Radiological remission

    Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 36

    Compare the rate of radiological remission (early remission at week 12; remission at weeks 24 and 36) between the two groups.

  9. Clinical and biological remission

    Time frame: Week 12, 24 and 36

    compare the rates of clinical and biological remission between the two groups at weeks 12, 24 and 36.

  10. Health-related quality of life assessed by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)

    Time frame: week 36

    PedsQL total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

  11. Number of days of school absenteeism (children) and work absenteeism (parents) recorded using the electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) diary, during each 12-week period

    Time frame: week 36

    School and parental absenteeism will be assessed as the number of days missed from school by the child and the number of days missed from work by the parent during the previous 12 weeks. Data will be collected using the electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) diary and compared between treatment groups.

  12. Safety and tolerability of zoledronate, assessed by the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events during the 36-week follow-up period

    Time frame: week 36

  13. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of zoledronate versus placebo at week 36

    Time frame: week 36

    Cost-effectiveness will be assessed by estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.

  14. Proportion of participants achieving PedCNO50 response at week 36

    Time frame: week 36

    PedCNO50 is defined as at least 50% improvement in at least three of five core variables, with no more than one variable worsening by >50%.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Perrine DUSSER, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33145213254

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Other

Registry information

Official study title

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ZOLEDRONATE VERSUS PLACEBO ON PAIN AT WEEK 12 IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC RECURRENT MULTIFOCAL OSTEOMYELITIS RESISTANT TO NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUG

Acronym: POMREP

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.