Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07377305

Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIS) for Neuropathic Pain in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

This is an open-label, single-arm, single-center prospective pilot study to assess the efficacy and safety of transcranial temperol interference stimulation in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) complicated by neuropathic pain in China.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but severe demyelinating condition that affects mainly adult patients. In the course of NMOSD, pain is a common accompanying symptom, aside from other symptoms such as visual impairment, limb weakness, limb numbness, and urinary and fecal dysfunction. Among these, neuropathic pain is the most common, affecting over 80% of patients with NMOSD. It occurs not only during the acute phase of NMOSD but also serves as the main form of chronic pain. Currently, there is no standard clinical protocol for the treatment of neuropathic pain, and the efficacy of analgesic drugs is limited. Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) is emerging as a non-invasive therapeutic alternative to deep brain stimulation (DBS). Studies have shown that tTIS exerts a positive impact on neural function, including enhancing memory function and improving motor function. While it still remains underdeveloped about tTIS in the field of pain management. Based on this, we intend to conduct a small-sample prospective self-controlled study. By analyzing the baseline clinical characteristics, we will compare the changes in pain scale scores (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS], Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), Global Impression Scales, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, Painful Spasm Frequency Scale, and Hamilton Anxiety/Depression Scale scores before and after tTIS treatment. Through this, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic approach in subjects suffered from NMOSD-related neuropathic pain.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients diagnosed with NMOSD in accordance with the criteria of the International Panel for Neuromyelitis Optica Diagnosis (IPND).
  • Patients were complicated with neuropathic pain, with a DN4 score ≥ 4.
  • NRS score for pain ≥ 4 points, and neuropathic pain has persisted for more than 3 months.
  • Patients receiving biological therapy and/or prednisone at a stable dose, with no adjustment of the treatment plan within 30 days before enrollment.
  • Patients who have not adjusted any combination of standard analgesic drugs (including antiepileptic drugs, antidepressants, and opioid drugs) within 30 days before enrollment.
  • Patients or their family members who have signed a written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

  • Subjects participating in other clinical studies.
  • Subjects who have used investigational drugs for pain control within 30 days before enrollment.
  • Subjects with a concurrent diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy.
  • Subjects with concurrent active central nervous system diseases.
  • Subjects with cognitive or mental disorders.
  • Subjects who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Subjects with severe diseases related to the heart, liver, kidneys, or hematopoietic system.
  • Subjects with implanted devices in the body (such as cardiac pacemakers, nerve stimulators, etc.).
  • Subjects with a history of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) allergy, latex allergy, or previous intolerance.
  • Subjects with contraindications to MRI examination.
  • Subjects with head skin lesions.
  • Other medical conditions or situations that the researcher deems may affect the achievement of the study objectives.

Treatment and study plan

10Hz tTIS (2-4mA) Intervention

Device

tTIS (10Hz envelope field, current intensity 2-4mA)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in numerical rating scale (NRS) score

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

    Patients are followed up and NRS score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of NRS are 0 and 10, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in visual analog scale (VAS) score

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

    Patients are followed up and VAS score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of VAS are 0 and 10, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

  2. Change from baseline in patient global impression of change (PGIC) score

    Time frame: Immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

    Patients are followed up and PGIC score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of PGIC are 1 and 7, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

  3. Change from baseline in short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) score

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

    Patients are followed up and SF-MPQ score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of SF-MPQ are 0 and 45, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

  4. Change from baseline in Penn spasm frequency scale (PSFS) score

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

    Patients are followed up and PSFS score is determined. In general, spasm frequency and spasm severity are evaluated. The minimum and maximum scores of spasm frequency are 0 and 4, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome. The minimum and maximum scores of spasm severity are 1 and 3, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

  5. Change from baseline in Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAMA) score

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

    Patients are followed up and HAMA score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of HAMA are 0 and 56, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

  6. Change from baseline in Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD) score

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after 5 consecutive treatments, 1 week after treatment, 2 weeks after treatment

    Patients are followed up and HAMD score is determined. In general, the minimum and maximum scores of HAMD are 0 and 54, respectively, with higher scores meaning a worse outcome.

  7. Adverse events

    Time frame: Baseline up to 2 weeks after treatment

    tTIS-related adverse events (AEs), such as headache, scalp irritation, rash, epilepsy, are evaluated and the rate of AEs is recorded.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jun GUO, Dr

CONTACT

[email protected]

(86)13991269132

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Tang-Du Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Single-center, Prospective, Single-arm Clinical Study: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIS) for Neuropathic Pain in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 29, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 29, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.