Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06642038

Efficacy and Safety of Transbronchial Bronchoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation (BTVA) in Heterogeneous Emphysema

Efficacy and Safety of Transbronchial BTVA in Heterogeneous Emphysema: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Clinical Study

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

40 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, age ≥40 and ≤75 years old
  • Heterogeneous emphysema
  • 20% predicted value ≤ FEV1 ≤ 50% predicted value, TLC ≥ 100% predicted value, RV ≥ 150% predicted value, DLCO ≥ 20% predicted value
  • 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) > 140m
  • mMRC index ≥ 2
  • The patients have fully understood the content of the trial and voluntarily signed the informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindications to bronchoscopy include: myocardial infarction within the past month, active massive hemoptysis, coagulation dysfunction, pregnancy, malignant arrhythmia, severe pulmonary hypertension, extreme systemic failure, and other conditions
  • Concomitant diseases that may significantly increase the risk of complications after BTVA treatment include, but are not limited to: immune system disorders, bleeding disorders, unstable cardiovascular disease, a history of asthma, and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
  • Concomitant medications known to significantly increase the risk of complications after BTVA treatment include, but are not limited to: immunosuppressive drugs (except topical medications), anticoagulants, and antiplatelet drugs
  • Receiving morphine derivatives within 4 weeks prior to screening
  • Respiratory tract infection or exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) within 6 weeks prior to screening
  • The upper and lower lobes of the other lung have high-grade emphysematous lesions, defined as HRCT showing that the low-density attenuation area (less than -950 Hu) accounts for more than 40% of the total lung volume.
  • The lobe of the lung where the intended treatment segment is located has large bullae (defined as bullae that occupy more than one-third of the lobe) or paralobular septal emphysema.
  • Symptoms or abnormal laboratory values suggesting active infection (e.g., fever, elevated white blood cell count, etc.).
  • Patients who have undergone or plan to undergo lung or chest surgery during this study, including but not limited to lung resection or lung transplantation.
  • Patients evaluated by specialists to have highly suspected malignant pulmonary nodules.
  • Women who intend to become pregnant, are pregnant, or are breastfeeding during the study.
  • Patients participating in other drug or medical device clinical trials.
  • The investigator believes the patient has other conditions that make them unsuitable for inclusion in this study.

Treatment and study plan

Transbronchial Endoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation

Procedure

Transbronchial Endoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation

Primary outcomes

  1. The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is used to assess lung function

    Time frame: 6 months

    Evaluate the improvement in FEV1 from baseline to 6 months after BTVA treatment.

  2. The Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire-C (SGRQ-C) questionnaire was used to evaluate the value of patients' quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months

    Evaluate the improvement in SGRQ-C questionnaire from baseline to 6 months after BTVA treatment. The total score of SGRQ-C questionnaire usually ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best condition and 100 representing the worst condition.

Secondary outcomes

  1. FEV1 is used to assess lung function

    Time frame: 12 months

    Improvement in FEV1 12 months after the first treatment.

  2. The SGRQ-C questionnaire was used to evaluate the value of patients' quality of life.

    Time frame: 12 months

    Improvement in SGRQ-C 12 months after the first treatment. The total score of SGRQ-C questionnaire usually ranges from 0 to 100, with 0 representing the best condition and 100 representing the worst condition.

  3. Forced expiratory volume in one second/Forced vital capcacity(FEV1/FVC) were used to assess lung function

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Improvement in FEV1/FVC compared to baseline at 6 and 12 months after the first treatment

  4. FVC were used to assess lung function

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Improvement in FVC compared to baseline at 6 and 12 months after the first treatment

  5. ResidualVolume (RV) were used to assess lung function

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Improvement in RV compared to baseline at 6 and 12 months after the first treatment

  6. Total Lung Capacity(TLC) were used to assess lung function

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Improvement in TLC compared to baseline at 6 and 12 months after the first treatment

  7. 6 minute walking distance (6MWD) was used to assess exercise tolerance

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Improvement in exercise tolerance compared to baseline at 6 and 12 months after the first treatment: 6MWD.

  8. Symptom scoring using COPD Assessment Test (CAT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scoring table

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Improvement in symptom scores compared to baseline at 6 and 12 months after the first treatment: CAT, mMRC. The CAT score is a comprehensive assessment of symptoms, ranging from 0 to 40 points. A score of 10 or above indicates a higher number of symptoms. Scores between 0 and 10 reflect a mild impact, 11 to 20 indicate a moderate impact, 21 to 30 represent a severe impact, and 31 to 40 signify a very severe impact on the patient's condition. The mMRC score is a scale used to assess the degree of breathlessness, with a range from 0 to 4. A higher score indicates greater severity of symptoms. A score of 0 reflects no breathlessness except with strenuous exercise, 1 indicates breathlessness when hurrying on level ground or walking up a slight hill, 2 represents breathlessness causing the patient to walk slower than people of the same age or having to stop for breath when walking at their own pace, 3 indicates stopping for breath after walking about 100 meters or after a few minutes on le

  9. Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v5.0

    Time frame: At surgery and 12 months after surgery

    All adverse events during surgery and postoperative follow-up were recorded and evaluated according to CTCAE V5.0. The relevance of these events to BTVA treatment was assessed, and the incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events related to BTVA treatment was calculated.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ye Gu

Other

Collaborators

  • Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
  • First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
  • First Hospital of China Medical University
  • Jiangxi Provincial People's Hopital
  • Ruijin Hospital
  • Shandong Provincial Public Health Clinical Center
  • Shenzhen Baoan District People's Hospital
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
  • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  • Zhongda Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Safety of Transbronchial BTVA in Heterogeneous Emphysema: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter Clinical Study

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
Registry last updated
Oct 15, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.