Abatacept
DrugOther names: Orencia
NCT Number: NCT01860976
The purpose of this study is to compare subcutaneous Abatacept to placebo in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Local Institution, Ciudad Autonoma Beunos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
ASTRAEA=Active PSoriaTic ARthritis RAndomizEd TriAl
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Orencia
Time frame: Day 169
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 definition of improvement is a 20% improvement over baseline in tender and swollen joint counts and a 20% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core data set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function, acute phase reactant value). The number of ACR 20 responders was divided by the number of treated participants and expressed as a percentage. Early escape participants, and participants with missing data at day 169 were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
Participants were considered responders if their HAQ score decreased at least 0.35 from baseline. The number of HAQ responders was divided by the number of treated participants and expressed as a percentage. Scoring conventions are based on the Standard Disability Index of HAQ/HAQ-DI using the 20 response items. For each of the 8 disability categories there is an "aids/devices" companion variable that is used to record the type of assistance, if any, a participant uses for his/her usual activities. If either "aids/devices" and/or "assistance from another person" are checked for a disability category, the score for this category is set to "2" (much difficulty), if the original score was "0" (no difficulty) or "1" (some difficulty). The HAQ-DI is then calculated by summing the adjusted categories scores and dividing by the number of categories answered. Early escape participants, and participants with missing data at day 169 were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Day 169
The ACR 20 definition of improvement is a 20% improvement over baseline in tender and swollen joint counts and a 20% in 3 of the 5 remaining core data set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function, acute phase reactant value). The number of ACR 20 responders was divided by the number of treated, TNFi-naive participants and expressed as a percentage. Early escape participants, and participants with missing data at day 169 were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Day 169
The ACR 20 definition of improvement is a 20% improvement over baseline in tender and swollen joint counts and a 20% in 3 of the 5 remaining core data set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function, acute phase reactant value). The number of ACR 20 responders was divided by the number of treated, TNFi-exposed participants and expressed as a percentage. Early escape participants, and participants with missing data at day 169 were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
The number of radiographic non-progressors in total PsA-Modified Sharp van der Heijde score (SHS) at Day 169 was divided by the number of treated participants and expressed as a percentage. Non-progression was defined as a change from baseline in total PsA modified SHS ≤0. Early escape participants, and participants with missing data at day 169 were imputed as non-progressors.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
The number of participants who achieved at least 50% improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index Arthritis (PASI 50) at Day 169 was divided by the number of treated participants with BSA >= 3% and expressed as a percentage. Only participants with >= 3% body surface area (BSA) of psoriatic skin involvement at randomization were included in this analysis.
Time frame: Day 169
The ACR 50 and ACR 70 definition of improvement is a 50% or 70% improvement, respectively, over baseline in tender and swollen joint counts and a 50% or 70% improvement in 3 of the 5 remaining core data set measures (participant global assessment of pain, participant global assessment of disease activity, physician global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of physical function, acute phase reactant value). The number of ACR 50 and ACR 70 responders was divided by the number of treated participants and expressed as a percentage. Early escape participants, and participants with missing data at day 169 were imputed as non-responders.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
Adjusted mean change in scores on the Short Form 36 physical and mental function assessment (SF-36) from baseline were analyzed from the physical component summary (PCS) mental component summary (MCS). The SF-36 is a participant questionnaire assessing 8 domains of health status: physical functioning, pain, vitality, social functioning, psychological functioning, general health perception, and role limitations due to physical and emotional problems. The instrument can be divided into two summary scores, physical and mental component score. The scores range from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating better quality of life. The two summary scores (PCS and MCS) will be calculated by taking a weighted linear combination of the 8 individual subscales.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 169
Blood samples were collected at Days 1, 85 and 169 and assayed for the presence of abatacept-specific antibodies. The number of participants with at least one positive immunogenicity response was divided by the number of treated participants and expressed as a percentage.
Time frame: Day 169
Proportion of participants with AEs at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Proportion of participants with SAEs at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Proportion of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Proportion of participant deaths at Day 169
Time frame: Day 169
Proportion of participants with marked laboratory abnormalities at Day 169
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Industry
A Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Subcutaneous Injection in Adults With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
Acronym: ASTRAEA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05616871
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03895203
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03896581
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04009499
Arthritis, Arthritis, Psoriatic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details