Viaskin Peanut 50 mcg
BiologicalSubjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 50 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
NCT Number: NCT01675882
The objectives of this dose-finding study for the treatment of peanut allergy are:
* To determine the efficacy of 3 doses of Viaskin Peanut (50 mcg ,100 mcg and 250 mcg peanut protein per patch) to significantly desensitize peanut-allergic subjects to peanut after 12 months of treatment. * To evaluate the safety of a long-term treatment with Viaskin Peanut.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me6 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Cheema Research Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Peanut allergy is a common allergy in the United States, with a prevalence in the general population as high as 1%. Peanut allergy management is based on strict peanut avoidance and injectable epinephrine after the allergic systemic reactions have started. Specific Immunotherapy methods currently available have shown some limitations in their use because of safety issues. Hence, there is an important unmet medical need for efficient and safe treatment of peanut allergy.
DBV Technologies has developed an epicutaneous delivery system, called Viaskin, a method based on delivering precise quantity of the allergen on the upper layers of the skin. Avoiding contact between the allergen and the bloodstream should confer to epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) a higher level of safety as systemic reactions should be circumvented
The VIPES study is a 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled,randomized trial to study the efficacy and safety of Viaskin Peanut in subjects from 6 to 55 years old with a history of immediate hypersensitive reaction to peanut protein.
The trial will be conducted at sites with investigators and staff trained and experienced in the diagnosis and the management of peanut allergy and anaphylaxis, and who are capable of performing a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) in adult and/or pediatric subjects. Three doses of peanut proteins, i.e. 50 mcg, 100 mcg and 250 mcg will be evaluated for the study. Following the confirmation of peanut allergy at screening, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio into four different treatment groups, including 50 mcg, 100 mcg and 250 mcg peanut protein or placebo. Treatment will be comprised of daily applications of Viaskin Peanut or placebo patch for 12 months. Each subject will undergo two DBPCFCs: one at screening and one at Month 12. A follow up visit will be performed 2 weeks after completion of treatment and the last DBPCFC.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 50 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 100 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing 250 mcg peanut proteins as whole peanut extract
Subjects epicutaneously administered for 24 hours every 24 hours with a patch containing a matching placebo formulation
Time frame: At Month 12
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: At Month 12
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: At Month 12
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: At Month 12
A treatment responder was defined as a participant with a peanut protein eliciting dose equal to or greater than 1,000 mg peanut proteins based on the results of the DBPCFC after 12 months of treatment or a participant with a >=10-fold increase of the eliciting dose at 12 months, compared to the initial eliciting dose. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: At Month 12
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at the screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: At Month 12
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: At Month 12
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: At Month 12
The peanut protein eliciting dose was defined as the first dose of peanut protein administered to the participant during the DBPCFC procedure which caused an objective allergic reaction. This was capped to 300 mg at screening DBPCFC and to 2000 mg at the Month 12 DBPCFC. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: At Month 12
The peanut protein cumulative reactive dose was defined as the sum of all peanut protein doses up to and including the eliciting dose ingested during the peanut challenge. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: Baseline and Month 12
The symptoms of erythematous rash, pruritus, urticaria/angioedema, rash, sneezing/itching, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, laryngeal symptoms (example, throat clearing, occasional cough, hoarseness, frequent dry cough, inspiratory stridor), wheezing, subjective complaints, objective complaints and cardiovascular symptoms (example, color change, weakness, dizziness, mental status change, tachycardia, decreased blood pressure, etc) were observed. The OFC score ranges from 0 to 3 for each symptom (0=Absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe). The total symptom score for each participant was calculated. Higher scores indicate worst outcome. For participants with missing treatment response at Month 12, LOCF imputation was used (i.e., participants were considered as non-responders).
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
The mean wheal diameter of skin prick test (sum of the orthogonal diameters divided by 2) at each time point is calculated for the 5 skin prick tests at baseline and at each time point, i.e., Months 3, 6 and 12: undiluted, diluted 1:10 millimeter (mm), diluted 1:100 (mm), diluted 1:1,000 (mm), diluted 1:10,000 (mm). The ratio of the mean wheal diameter at each time point for a specific dilution versus the baseline value for that specific dilution was calculated and classified as <=0.5 or >0.5, allowing to assess the number of participants of those mean wheal diameters that have been at least halved from the baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgE at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
Time frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Venous blood samples were taken for assessment of the peanut-specific IgG4 at 3, 6 and 12 months. Results are presented using multiple imputation to replace missing values.
DBV Technologies
Industry
A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Trial to Study the Viaskin Peanut's Efficacy and Safety for Treating Peanut Allergy in Children and Adults.
Acronym: VIPES
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01955109
Food Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01074840
Food Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity
Dallas, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01170286
Food Hypersensitivity, Hypersensitivity
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03679676
Food Allergy, Food Hypersensitivity
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details