Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04023227

Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With CCC

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg BID compared with enalapril 10 mg BID, in addition to conventional heart failure (HF) treatment, in improving a hierarchical composite of cardiovascular (CV) events (i.e. CV death or the occurrence of first HF hospitalization) and causing a greater reduction in n terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, at Week 12 from Baseline) in participants with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) caused by chronic Chagas' cardiomyopathy (CCC).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–100 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This was a multinational, multicenter, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, open-label, with blinded-endpoint adjudication, active-controlled study. The target projected sample size was approximately 900 participants (450 in each arm). It was estimated that approximately 1800 participants would be screened at sites in Latin America, including Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico.

Participants who met the eligibility requirements were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive sacubitril/valsartan (target dose of 200 mg twice daily) or enalapril (target dose of 10 mg twice daily), in addition to their usual therapy, stratified by country, using a central, concealed, web-based, automated randomization system. Both groups entered a titration period of 3 to 6 weeks, aiming to achieve the target dose of sacubitril/valsartan 200 mg twice daily or enalapril 10 mg twice daily. The study follow-up succeeded the titration period and was to last until a total number of 302 events was reached and all randomized participants had a minimum follow-up of 12 weeks.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female ≥ 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of NYHA Class II-IV HFrEF established by:
  • LVEF ≤ 40% within 12 months prior to Visit 1 made by any local measurement using echocardiography, multiple gated acquisition scan (MUGA), computerized tomography (CT) scanning, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or ventricular angiography, provided no subsequent measurement above 40% AND
  • NT-proBNP ≥ 600 pg/mL (or BNP ≥ 150 pg/mL) at Visit 1 OR
  • NT-proBNP ≥ 400 pg/mL (or BNP ≥ 100 pg/mL) at Visit 1 and a hospitalization for HF within the last 12 months
  • Chagas' disease diagnosis confirmed by at least two different serological tests for anti-Trypanosoma cruzi based on different principles or with different antigenic preparations, such as: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], indirect immunofluorescence [IFI], indirect hemagglutination [IHA], western blot (WB), chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). If documented history is not available, the tests may be performed during the screening

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of suspected or proven angioedema or unable to tolerate ACEIs, ARBs or ARNI (e.g., due to cough, hypotension, renal dysfunction, hyperkalemia)
  • Use of sacubitril/valsartan in the past 3 months
  • Patients requiring continuous intravenous inotropic therapy or with indication of advanced support intervention for HF:
  • already on list for a heart transplantation
  • with current indication of left ventricular assist device, or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
  • Systemic systolic blood pressure lower than 95 mmHg or symptomatic hypotension
  • Serum potassium > 5.2 mmol/L
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 of body surface area
  • Severe gastrointestinal form of chronic Chagas' disease (demonstrated megaesophagus and/or important megacolon, e.g.: with compromised oral intake or surgical indication).
  • Clinical conditions or systemic diseases limiting proper patient participation
  • Pregnant or nursing women or women of child-bearing potential unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception
  • Presence of other cardiac conditions:
  • Previous cardiac surgery
  • Heart failure where, in the Investigator's judgement, there is a possible alternative primary etiology e.g., due to coronary artery disease, valve disease, congenital heart disease or other causes.
  • Untreated arrhythmia or serious conduction disease e.g., bradyarrhythmias, atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, second or third degree atrioventricular block, etc.
  • Primary uncorrected valvar pathology like moderate to severe aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis and primary mitral regurgitation
  • Planned organ transplantation (or in listing for transplantation), planned cardiac or other major surgery (including ventricular assist device implantation)
  • History of malignancy of any organ system within the past 5 years.
  • Current confirmed COVID19 infection
  • Past COVID19 infection with persistent symptom burden suspected due to COVID19 (persistent symptoms may include, but are not limited to, continued cough, breathing difficulty, muscle/joint aches, and gastrointestinal symptoms from the time of COVID19 infection onward)

Treatment and study plan

sacubitril/valsartan

Drug

Participants randomized to sacubitril/valsartan who were previously treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) had a 36-hour washout prior to receiving oral treatment with 50, 100, or 200 mg, film-coated tablets.

Other names: LCZ696; Entresto; Vymada

Enalapril

Drug

Oral treatment with 5 or 10 mg tablets.

Other names: Renitec

Primary outcomes

  1. Hierarchical Composite Endpoint Composed of Time to Cardiovascular (CV) Death, Time to First Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization, and Relative Change in NT-proBNP From Baseline to Week 12

    Time frame: Total follow-up time up to approximately 36 months

    The primary efficacy endpoint was analyzed using the win ratio approach comparing every participant in the sacubitril/valsartan arm to every participant in the enalapril arm to determine a winner. A winner in the pair-wise comparison had a delayed time to the occurrence of CV death; if time to the occurrence of CV death was censored, a winner had a delayed time to the occurrence of first HF hospitalization event; if the times to both CV events were censored, a winner had a more favorable (less increase or more decrease) change in NT-proBNP between Baseline and Week 12. The estimated win ratio was defined as the total number of winners in the sacubitril/valsartan arm divided by the total number of winners in the enalapril arm. A win ratio >1 represents a favorable outcome for the study drug being assessed.

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Died From Cardiovascular Causes

    Time frame: Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months

  3. Percentage of Participants With First Hospitalization for Worsening Heart Failure

    Time frame: Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in NT-proBNP Levels

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 12

    Geometric mean factor change was derived from a linear regression model of log(NT-proBNP), adjusted for country and baseline value.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With First Hospitalization Due to Heart Failure or Death From Cardiovascular Causes

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the first occurrence (total follow up time up to approximately 36 months)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Died From Any Cause

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause assessed up to the end of the study, up to approximately 36 months

  3. Number of Participants Who Had Sudden Death or Resuscitated Sudden Cardiac Arrest

    Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of the sudden death or resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest assessed up to the end of the study, up to approximately 36 months

  4. Number of Participants Who Had Visits to an Emergency Room Due to Heart Failure (HF) Where Intravenous Therapy Was Required

    Time frame: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.

  5. Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital

    Time frame: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.

    The duration of hospital-free survival within 1 year from randomization was summarized.

  6. Number of Hospitalizations Due to Heart Failure (HF) or Death Due to Cardiovascular (CV) Causes (Recurrent Events)

    Time frame: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Ventricular Fibrillation or Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia

    Time frame: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.

    The number of ventricular fibrillation or sustained ventricular tachycardia needing specific pharmacological, electrical or other treatment was determined.

  2. Number of Anti-tachycardia Pacing or Shock Therapies

    Time frame: From the date of randomization up to end of study. Total follow up time up to approximately 36 months.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded-endpoint, Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Compared With Enalapril on Morbidity, Mortality, and NT-proBNP Change in Patients With Chronic Chagas' Cardiomyopathy. The Study is Also Know as Prevention And Reduction of Adverse Outcomes in Chagasic Heart failUre Trial Evaluation (PARACHUTE-HF).

Acronym: PARACHUTE-HF

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 17, 2019
Registry last updated
May 11, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.