Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01599650

Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab With or Without Laser in Comparison to Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

This study will generate comparative data for 0.5-mg ranibizumab using PRN dosing administered with or without adjunctive laser treatment versus laser photocoagulation (the current standard of care) up to Month 6 in patients with visual impairment due to ME secondary to BRVO. Additionally the results of this study will provide long-term (24-month) safety and efficacy data for ranibizumab, administered with or without adjunctive laser treatment in this indication.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Parramatta, New South Wales, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any study assessment is performed
  • Diagnosis of visual impairment exclusively due to ME secondary to BRVO
  • BCVA score at Screening and Baseline between 73 and 19 letters (ETDRS)

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Stroke or myocardial infarction less than 3 months before Screening
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as systolic value of >160 mm Hg or diastolic value of >100 mm Hg at Screening or Baseline.
  • Any active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation at Screening or Baseline in either eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma at Screening or Baseline or diagnosed within 6 months before Baseline in either eye
  • Neovascularization of the iris or neovascular glaucoma in the study eye
  • Use of any systemic antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs within 6 months before Baseline
  • Panretinal laser photocoagulation within 3 months before Baseline or anticipated or scheduled within the next 3 months following Baseline in the study eye
  • Focal or grid laser photocoagulation within 4 months before Baseline in the study eye
  • Use of intra- or periocular corticosteroids (including sub-Tenon) within 3 months before Screening in the study eye
  • Any use of intraocular corticosteroid implants (eg, dexamethasone [Ozurdex®], fluocinolone acetonide [Iluvien®]) in the study eye

Treatment and study plan

ranibizumab

Drug

Other names: Lucentis

LASER

Procedure

laser photocoagulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Visual Acuity: BCVA Change at Month 6 Compared to Baseline in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 Months

    Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)

    -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 6 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and assessed by an ANOVA model.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Mean Average Change in Visual Acuity From Month 1 Through Month 24 Compared to Baseline

    Time frame: Baseline, 24 Months

    Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. (A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement): Mean Average Change: for each patient, first average change is calculated as the average of the changes from baseline to Month 1 over Month 24. Then, mean average change is calculated as the average of average changes across all patients.

  2. Number of Ranibizumab Treatments From Day 1 to Month 23 by Treatment Group

    Time frame: Day 1 through Month 23

    Number of injections provided to the patients during the 23 month period and conducted within FAS with LOCF and observed data.

  3. Mean Average Change in Visual Acuity (BCVA Letters) From Month 1 Through Month 6

    Time frame: From Baseline through Month 6

    Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters.(A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement): Mean Average Change: for each patient, first average change is calculated as the average of the changes from baseline to Month 1 over Month 6. Then, mean average change is calculated as the average of average changes across all patients.

  4. The Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline at Month 12 and Month 24

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

    Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 12 and Month 24 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and were assessed by an ANOVA model.

  5. The Percent of Patients With a Visual Acuity Gain of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 24, by Visit

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 6 and Month 24

    BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the number of participants who had improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 letters of visual acuity at Month 6 & Month 24 as compared with baseline, was assessed by an ANOVA model. Endpoints related to the proportion of patients with BCVA letter gain or loss from Baseline was analyzed via stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification based on baseline BCVA (baseline BCVA less than or equal to 39, 40 to 59, greater than or equal to 60 letters, treatment groups).

  6. Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs Baseline or Achieving Greater Than or Equal to 73 Letters at Month 6 in the Study Eye

    Time frame: Month 6

    Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and Month 6 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 6 indicates a positive outcome.

  7. Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs Baseline or Achieved Greater Than or Equal to 73 Letters at Month 24 in the Study Eye

    Time frame: Month 24

    Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and Month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 24 indicates a positive outcome.

  8. The Mean Change in Central Reading Center-assessed Central Subfield Thickness From Month 12 and Month 24 vs. Baseline by Treatment Arm

    Time frame: Month 12 and Month 24

    Retinal thickness was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The images were reviewed by a central reading center to ensure a standardized evaluation. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline best corrected visual acuity & analysis was based on analysis of variance (ANOVA)

  9. The Mean Change in Patient Reported Outcomes in NEI-VFQ-25 Score (Composite Score and Subscales) at Month 6 and Month 24 Compared to Baseline

    Time frame: Months 6 and 24

    The survey consists of 25 items representing 11 vision related constructs (general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision) plus a single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. In this format scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score.

  10. BCVA (Letters) Mean Average Change From First Ranibizumab Treatment to Month 24 in the Study Eye for Patients Randomized to the Laser Monotherapy Arm

    Time frame: Month 24

    Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)

    -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 24 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and assessed by an ANOVA model.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A 24-month, Phase IIIb, Open-label, Randomized, Active Controlled, 3-arm, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of an Individualized, Stabilization-criteria-driven PRN Dosing Regimen With 0.5-mg Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections Applied as Monotherapy or With Adjunctive Laser Photocoagulation in Comparison to Laser Photocoagulation in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Acronym: BRIGHTER

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
May 16, 2012
Registry last updated
Nov 10, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.