Poly-L-lactic acid - Sculptra
DeviceParticipants using Sculptra - Poly-L-lactic acid 3 sessions in the first side and 3 sessions on the second side
NCT Number: NCT03225066
This study aims to assess efficacy and safety of Sculptra in the treatment of skin flaccidity in selected areas - arms, anteromedial region, and gluteal regions. To assess the efficacy of Sculptra®, via adapted Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale -GAIS- score determined by blind evaluator, in the treatment of skin flaccidity on the anteromedial region of arm and gluteal region, 4 months after initiating the treatment, based on the assessment of the corporal side randomized to be the first to receive treatment . Considering as an alternative hypothesis of interest a 70% value of the subjects the treated side would have higher GAIS than the untreated side.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year–60 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Centro Brasileiro de Estudos em Dermatologia, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Ethical and General considerations regarding the study conduction: This study protocol will be reviewed and approved by appropriate IEC/IRB prior to the initiation of the study.
Clinical monitoring: Study conduction will be closely monitored by Galderma representatives, following GCP regulations, applicable standard operating procedures, guides and local regulations.
Data Management: Data may be audited by Galderma Quality Assurance Department and/or CRO prior to or after results of the first statistical analysis on the primary discretion.
Quality assurance, auditing and Inspection: The study will be carried out under the sponsorship of Galderma in accordance with all local and federal regulations, as well as ICH guidelines. Audits and inspections at the research site may be conducted by Galderma representatives or local authorities. All aspects in any study step can be audited by Galderma Quality Assurance / CRO and, as a result, a certificate stating this will be provided.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants using Sculptra - Poly-L-lactic acid 3 sessions in the first side and 3 sessions on the second side
Time frame: 4 months after starting Side 1 treatment
To see the percentage of research subjects, to which the blind evaluator assigned a Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale score (GAIS) score higher to Side 1 than the corporal side which will be the second to receive treatment (Side 2), 4 months after starting Side 1 treatment.
Time frame: 4 months after starting Side 1 treatment
Time frame: 4, 6 and 12 months after starting side 1 treatment and 6 and 8 months after starting side 2
3.1. Mean GAIS score assigned by the investigator to Side 1, 4 months after initiating treatment.
3.2. Mean GAIS score assigned by the investigator to Side 1, 6 months after initiating treatment.
3.3. Mean GAIS score assigned by the investigator to Side 1, 12 months after initiating treatment.
3.4. Mean GAIS score assigned by the investigator to Side 2, 6 months after initiating treatment.
3.5. Mean GAIS score assigned by the investigator to Side 2, 8 months after initiating treatment.
Time frame: 4, 6 and 12 months after initiating side 1 as well as 6 and 8 months after initiating side 2 treatment
4.1. Mean GAIS score assigned by the research subject to Side1, 4 months after initiating treatment.
4.2. Mean GAIS score assigned by the female subject to Side1, 6 months after initiating treatment.
4.3. Mean GAIS score assigned by the female subject to Side1, 12 months after initiating treatment.
4.4. Mean GAIS score assigned by the female subject to Side2, 6 months after initiating treatment.
4.5. Mean GAIS score assigned by the female subject to Side2, 8 months after initiating treatment.
Time frame: 4 months after initiating side 1 treatment
Percentage of research subjects to which the investigator assigned a GAIS score to Side 1, 4 months after initiating treatment, indicating aesthetic improvement (GAIS score between 3 and 5) in relation to pre-treatment condition.
Time frame: 4 months after initiating Side 1 treatment
Percentage of research subjects to which the investigator determined that the treated side (Side1) is aesthetically better than the non-treated side, 4 months after initiating Side1 treatment.
Time frame: 4 months after initiating side 1 treatment
Percentage of research subjects evaluating the treated side (Side1) as aesthetically better than the non-treated side (Side2), 4 months after initiating Side1 treatment.
Time frame: 4, 6 and 12 months after initiating side 1 treatment as well as 2 and 8 months after initiating Side 2 treatment
8.1. Variation of Side1 dermal thickness between baseline visit and 4 months after initiating treatment.
8.2. Variation of Side1 dermal thickness between baseline visit and 6 months after initiating treatment.
8.3. Variation of Side1 dermal thickness between baseline visit and 12 months after initiating treatment.
8.4. Variation of Side2 dermal thickness between baseline visit and 2 months after initiating treatment.
8.5. Variation of Side2 dermal thickness between baseline visit and 8 months after initiating treatment.
Time frame: 1 year
Mean score of subject s discomfort with Sculptra application during treatment period.
Time frame: 4 and 12 months after initiating side 1 treatment
10.1. Variation of Side1 arm circumference between baseline visit and 4 months after initiating treatment.
10.2. Variation of Side1 arm circumference between baseline visit and 12 months after initiating treatment.
Time frame: 4, 6 and 12 months after initiating side 1 treatment as well as 6 and 8 months after initiating side 2 treatment
11.1.Descriptive statistics of the satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the investigator 4 months after initiating Side1 treatment.
11.2. Descriptive statistics of the satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the investigator 6 months after initiating Side1 treatment.
11.3. Descriptive statistics of the satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the investigator 12 months after initiating Side1 treatment.
11.4. Descriptive statistics of the satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the investigator 6 months after initiating Side2 treatment.
11.5. Descriptive statistics of the satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the investigator 8 months after initiating Side2 treatment.
Time frame: 4, 6 and 12 months after initiating Side 1 treatment, as well as 6 and 8 months after initiating Side2 treatment
12.1. Descriptive statistics of satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the subject 4 months after initiating Side1 treatment.
12.2. Descriptive statistics of satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the subject 6 months after initiating Side1 treatment.
12.3. Descriptive statistics of satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the subject 12 months after initiating Side1 treatment.
12.4. Descriptive statistics of satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the subject 6 months after initiating Side2 treatment.
12.5. Descriptive statistics of satisfaction questionnaire and aesthetic result perception, completed by the subject 8 months after initiating Side2 treatment.
Time frame: An average of 1 year
13.1. Incidence, seriousness, severity and relationship with management of adverse events reported during study period.
13.2. Incidence, seriousness, severity and relationship with management of adverse events of interest reported during study period.
13.3. Incidence of treatment discontinuations due to adverse events reported during study period
Galderma Brasil Ltda.
Industry
A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Self-controlled, Blinded Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Poly-L-lactic Acid - SCULPTRA - for the Treatment of Corporal Skin Flaccidity.
Acronym: Sculptra
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03548779
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Brain Diseases
Asheville, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05529420
Muscle Hypotonia, Muscle Relaxation
Brno, South Moravian, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT05310110
Anesthesia, General, Muscle Hypotonia
Taoyuan City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT04846400
Apnea, Child, Only
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details