Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00690430

Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide Long Acting Release vs. Octreotide Long Acting Release in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoid Disease

The purpose of this randomized, multicenter, Phase III study was to compare the efficacy of paseriotide LAR and octreotide LAR in patients whose disease-related symptoms are inadequately controlled by currently available somatostatin analogues.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Novartis Investigative Site, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients aged 18 or greater
  • Patients with carcinoid tumors and symptoms (diarrhea and flushing) that are not adequately controlled by somatostatin analogues.
  • Female patients of child bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at baseline.
  • Patients for whom written informed consent to participate in the study has been obtained.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients receiving radiolabeled somatostatin analogue therapy within the 3 months or any cytotoxic chemotherapy or interferon therapy within the 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Diabetic patients on anti-diabetic medications whose fasting blood glucose is poorly controlled as indicated by HBA1C > 8%
  • Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis
  • Patient with malabsorption syndrome, short bowel or cholegenic diarrhea not controlled by specific therapeutic means.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Treatment and study plan

Pasireotide

Drug

Pasireotide LAR 60mg i.m. injection - patients may also receive pasireotide 600 µg s.c 3 times a day for symptom control as needed

Other names: SOM230

Octreotide

Drug

Octreotide LAR 40mg i.m. depot injection - Patients may also receive octreotide 100 µg s.c. 3 times a day for symptom control as needed

Other names: Sadostatin LAR

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Clinical Symptom Improvement by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.

    Time frame: Month 6

    Percentage of patients who received clinical benefit in symptom (diarrhea and/or flushing) improvement as: Diarrhea (D)+Flushing (F): Patients with a daily mean number (#) of at least four bowel movements and a total of five or more flushing episodes. Clinical Benefit Response Criteria (CBRC): <4 daily mean bowel movements AND at least 20% reduction from Baseline in the daily mean # of bowel movements AND any reduction in the total # of flushing episodes compared with Baseline. (D) Patients with a daily mean # of at least four bowel movements and a total # of <5 flushing episodes. (CBRC) <4 daily mean bowel movements AND at least a 20% reduction from Baseline in the daily mean # of bowel movements. (F) Patients with a total # of at least 14 flushing episodes and a daily mean # of <4 bowel movements (CBRC) At least a 30% reduction from Baseline in the total # of flushing episodes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Daily Mean Number of Diarrhea Bowel Movement Episodes by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.

    Time frame: 6 months

    Percent change from Baseline in mean daily bowel movements at Month 6 were compared between the two treatment groups using ANCOVA model with treatment as the main effect and symptom levels at Baseline (e.g. mean daily bowel movement at Baseline) and randomization stratum (D+F or D) as covariates. Percentage change = (Month 6 - baseline)/baseline.

  2. Improvement in Daily Mean Number of Flushing Episodes by Randomization Stratum and Treatment.

    Time frame: 6 months

    Percent change from Baseline in total number of flushing episodes comprising Month 6 were compared between the two treatment groups using ANCOVA model with treatment as the main effect and symptom levels at Baseline (e.g. total number of flushing episodes at Baseline) and randomization stratum (D+F or F) as covariates.

  3. Pasireotide LAR vs. Octreotide LAR on Time to Symptom Response.

    Time frame: Month 6

  4. Objective Tumor Response Rate Assessed by Investigator

    Time frame: Month 6

    Baseline evaluations were to include Triphasic CT scan or MRI of the abdomen. Triphasic CT or MRIs were to be read by same radiologist at each assessment, measuring the same target and non-target lesions and accounting for all lesions that were present at Baseline. All known disease was accounted for when assessing objective tumor status. Current objective tumor status was to be captured on Tumor Assessment CRF. Objective response rate was defined by RECIST criteria: Partial response (PR) must have ≥ 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from the baseline sum. Complete response (CR) must have disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. For CR or PR, tumor measurements must be confirmed by 2nd assessments within 4 weeks. Progression = 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter of all target lesions, from smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline; or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions.

  5. Pasireotide LAR vs. Octreotide LAR on Disease Control Rate Based on RECIST Criteria

    Time frame: Month 6

    Disease control rate (DCR) is the proportion of patients with a best overall response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD). Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the longest diameters. Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline, or a new lesion; or progression of non-target lesions. Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for PD. Unknown (UNK) Progression has not been documented and one or more target lesions have not been assessed or have been assessed using a different method than baseline.

  6. Pasireotide LAR vs. Octreotide LAR on Quality of Life Assessed by FACIT-D Questionnaire

    Time frame: Month 6

  7. Pasireotide LAR vs. Octreotide LAR on Time to Symptom Progression

    Time frame: Month 6

  8. Pasireotide LAR vs. Octreotide LAR on Duration of Symptom Response

    Time frame: Month 6

  9. Assess the Proportion of Patients Who Achieved at Least a 30% Reduction in Frequency of Bowel Movements

    Time frame: Month 6

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded Efficacy and Safety Study of Pasireotide LAR vs Octreotide LAR in Patients With Metastatic Carcinoid Tumors Whose Disease-related Symptoms Are Inadequately Controlled by Somatostatin Analogues.

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jun 4, 2008
Registry last updated
Jul 30, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.