Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07453966
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding intrapulmonary percussion ventilation (IPV) to standard airway clearance treatment improves clinical outcomes in invasively mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection. It will also evaluate the safety of IPV in this population and assess changes in lung ventilation using electrical impedance tomography (EIT).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does adding IPV shorten the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation compared with standard therapy alone? Does IPV improve regional and global lung ventilation? Does IPV improve clinical indicators, including oxygenation, lung mechanics, and pulmonary infection scores? Is IPV safe in mechanically ventilated patients with pulmonary infection?
Participants will:
Receive either standard therapy alone or standard therapy plus IPV Undergo serial EIT monitoring at predefined time points Receive routine clinical assessments and ventilator parameter monitoring during ICU stay Be followed until successful weaning, discharge, or completion of hospitalization
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Wuhan, Hubei, 430071, China
Location status: Recruiting
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
In addition to standard airway clearance therapy, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) will be administered using the MetaNeb system for 15 minutes per session, twice daily (with an interval of at least 2 hours between sessions), for 5 consecutive days or until extubation or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.
Other names: continuous high-frequency oscillation
Participants in the control group will receive standard airway clearance therapy only, including postural drainage, humidification, and suctioning or fiberoptic bronchoscopy when necessary. In addition, they will undergo high-frequency chest wall oscillation therapy for 15 minutes per session, twice daily (with an interval of at least 2 hours between sessions). The MetaNeb system will not be used.
Time frame: 28 days after randomization
Time to successful liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation within 28 days after randomization, defined as discontinuation of invasive mechanical ventilation followed by at least 48 consecutive hours alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation. Death before successful liberation will be treated as a competing event.
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0) and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0) and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: From randomization to successful weaning, assessed up to 28 days
Successful weaning was defined as the absence of the need for reintubation or invasive mechanical ventilation within 48 hours after planned extubation. The successful weaning rate was calculated as the number of patients with successful weaning divided by the total number of patients who underwent a weaning attempt.
Time frame: Follow-up assessments were conducted 1 month after hospital discharge (30 ± 7 days), using the date
ICU length of stay was defined as the number of days from the date of first ICU admission to the date of final ICU discharge or death, calculated as calendar days.
Time frame: Follow-up assessments were conducted 1 month after hospital discharge (30 ± 7 days), using the date
Hospital length of stay was defined as the number of days from hospital admission to discharge or death, calculated as calendar days.
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), after 5 consecutive days of treatment (T3)
Score according to the following aspects:
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), after 5 consecutive days of treatment (T3)
The lungs are divided into six zones: the upper zone above the level of the carina, the middle zone between the carina and the inferior pulmonary veins, and the lower zone below the level of the inferior pulmonary veins. Within each zone, the predominant CT pattern is identified and assigned a weighted score based on the severity of lung damage, where a score of 1 indicates normal lung tissue, 2 indicates ground-glass opacity, 3 indicates consolidation, 4 indicates ground-glass opacity with traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis, 5 indicates consolidation with traction bronchiectasis or bronchiolectasis, and 6 indicates crazy-paving appearance. For each of the six zones, we estimates the percentage of the zone affected by the predominant pattern in increments of 10%, Zone Score = (Weight Score of the Pattern) × (Percentage of Zone Involved), Total Ichikado Score = (Sum of Six Zone Scores) / 6. A higher score indicating more extensive and severe lung involvement.
Time frame: From the first intervention session (T0) until 24 hours after the last MetaNeb treatment, up to 5 days.
The proportion of participants experiencing any predefined MetaNeb-related adverse events during the intervention period.
Adverse events include, but are not limited to: Oxygen desaturation (SpO₂ decrease ≥5% from baseline or SpO₂ <90%); Hemodynamic instability (heart rate change ≥20% from baseline or systolic blood pressure change ≥20% from baseline); New-onset arrhythmia; Barotrauma (including pneumothorax confirmed by imaging); Treatment intolerance leading to premature discontinuation.
Adverse events will be assessed during each treatment session and recorded according to predefined criteria.
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0) and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0) and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0) and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0) and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Time frame: Before the first treatment (T0), immediately after the first treatment (T1), 30min after the first treatment (T2), and after 5-day treatment (T3)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Zhongnan Hospital
Other
Efficacy and Safety of Intrapulmonary Percussive Ventilation in Patients With Pulmonary Infection Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00006150
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Genetic Diseases, Inborn
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00077909
Infections, Lung Disease
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07530146
Infections, Inflammation
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07463443
Behavior, Chatbot
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details